Examining the Long-term Retention of Associative Stimulus Relations in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Sou Ueda, Masaki Tomonaga
{"title":"Examining the Long-term Retention of Associative Stimulus Relations in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)","authors":"Sou Ueda, Masaki Tomonaga","doi":"10.1007/s10764-024-00456-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Humans can retain memories for months to decades. In contrast, relatively few studies have examined such very long-term memory in nonhuman animals. We, therefore, investigated whether chimpanzees (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>) who had learned arbitrary relations between stimuli remembered these relations over a long period. In Experiment 1, we tested four chimpanzees, one of whom (Chloe) had learned a “symbolic” matching task between colors and geometric forms at age 9–10 years, and three who had not been previously trained, on their memory for these relations 19 years later. Chloe showed perfect accuracy in the test trials; the three other chimpanzees did not perform better than chance level. In Experiment 2, we tested Popo and Reo, who had learned the same set at the same time as Chloe, on their memory 27 years later. Although they relearned the identity-matching task very quickly (savings effect), they did not retain the stimulus relations learned 27 years ago. In Experiment 3, we tested Chloe’s retention of a different set of stimulus relations, which she had learned at the same time as those tested in Experiment 1 but with less intensive training than with the first set. She did not perform better than the chance level. Finally, in Experiment 4, we tested the memory retention of another chimpanzee, Ai, who had learned to “label” objects with lexigrams more than 20 years earlier by using the matching task. She did not perform significantly better than chance on test trials. Thus, our results were not consistent across the experiments, providing only limited evidence that chimpanzees retain associative stimulus relations over the long term. Several factors, such as the effect of cognitive environments, the levels of processing, and the context-dependent nature of memory retrieval, could have affected our results, but none of these factors can account for all the results from the four experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14264,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Primatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00456-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans can retain memories for months to decades. In contrast, relatively few studies have examined such very long-term memory in nonhuman animals. We, therefore, investigated whether chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) who had learned arbitrary relations between stimuli remembered these relations over a long period. In Experiment 1, we tested four chimpanzees, one of whom (Chloe) had learned a “symbolic” matching task between colors and geometric forms at age 9–10 years, and three who had not been previously trained, on their memory for these relations 19 years later. Chloe showed perfect accuracy in the test trials; the three other chimpanzees did not perform better than chance level. In Experiment 2, we tested Popo and Reo, who had learned the same set at the same time as Chloe, on their memory 27 years later. Although they relearned the identity-matching task very quickly (savings effect), they did not retain the stimulus relations learned 27 years ago. In Experiment 3, we tested Chloe’s retention of a different set of stimulus relations, which she had learned at the same time as those tested in Experiment 1 but with less intensive training than with the first set. She did not perform better than the chance level. Finally, in Experiment 4, we tested the memory retention of another chimpanzee, Ai, who had learned to “label” objects with lexigrams more than 20 years earlier by using the matching task. She did not perform significantly better than chance on test trials. Thus, our results were not consistent across the experiments, providing only limited evidence that chimpanzees retain associative stimulus relations over the long term. Several factors, such as the effect of cognitive environments, the levels of processing, and the context-dependent nature of memory retrieval, could have affected our results, but none of these factors can account for all the results from the four experiments.

Abstract Image

研究黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)联想刺激关系的长期保持能力
人类的记忆可以保留几个月到几十年。相比之下,对非人类动物这种超长期记忆的研究相对较少。因此,我们研究了黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在学习了刺激物之间的任意关系后,是否能长期记住这些关系。在实验 1 中,我们测试了四只黑猩猩在 19 年后对这些关系的记忆情况,其中一只黑猩猩(克洛伊)在 9-10 岁时学习了颜色和几何图形之间的 "符号 "匹配任务,另外三只黑猩猩以前没有受过训练。克洛伊在测试中表现出了完美的准确性,而其他三只黑猩猩的表现并没有超过偶然水平。在实验 2 中,我们测试了波波和里欧 27 年后的记忆力。虽然他们很快就重新学习了身份匹配任务(储蓄效应),但他们并没有保留 27 年前学习的刺激关系。在实验 3 中,我们测试了克洛伊对另一组刺激关系的记忆保持情况,这组刺激关系与实验 1 中测试的刺激关系是同时学习的,但训练强度低于第一组。她的表现没有超过偶然水平。最后,在实验 4 中,我们用匹配任务测试了另一只黑猩猩小爱的记忆保持情况,小爱在 20 多年前就学会了用词法给物体 "贴标签"。它在测试试验中的表现并没有明显优于偶然性。因此,我们的实验结果并不一致,只能有限地证明黑猩猩能长期保持联想刺激关系。有几个因素可能会影响我们的结果,如认知环境的影响、加工水平以及记忆检索的情境依赖性,但这些因素都无法解释四个实验的所有结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Primatology is a multidisciplinary forum devoted to the dissemination of current research in fundamental primatology. Publishing peer-reviewed, high-quality original articles which feature primates, the journal gathers laboratory and field studies from such diverse disciplines as anthropology, anatomy, ecology, ethology, paleontology, psychology, sociology, and zoology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信