Developmental transcriptomics in Pristionchus reveals the logic of a plasticity gene regulatory network

Shelley Reich, Tobias Loschko, Julie Jung, Samantha Nestel, Ralf J. Sommer, Michael S. Werner
{"title":"Developmental transcriptomics in Pristionchus reveals the logic of a plasticity gene regulatory network","authors":"Shelley Reich, Tobias Loschko, Julie Jung, Samantha Nestel, Ralf J. Sommer, Michael S. Werner","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.12.612712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental plasticity enables the production of alternative phenotypes in response to different environmental conditions. While significant advances in understanding the ecological and evolutionary implications of plasticity have been made, understanding its genetic basis has lagged. However, a decade of genetic screens in the model nematode <em>Pristionchus pacificus</em> has culminated in 30 genes which affect mouth-form plasticity. We also recently reported the critical window of environmental sensitivity, and therefore have clear expectations for when differential gene expression should matter. Here, we collated previous data into a gene-regulatory network (GRN), and performed developmental transcriptomics across different environmental conditions, genetic backgrounds, and mouth-form mutants to assess the regulatory logic of plasticity. We found that only two genes in the GRN (<em>eud-1</em> and <em>seud-1/sult-1</em>) are sensitive to the environment during the critical window. Interestingly, the time points of their sensitivity differ, suggesting that they act as sequential checkpoints. We also observed temporal constraint upon the transcriptional effects of mutating the GRN and revealed unexpected feedback between mouth-form genes. Surprisingly, expression of <em>seud-1/sult-1</em>, but not <em>eud-1</em>, correlated with mouth form biases across different strains and species. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of all samples identified metabolism as a shared pathway for regulating mouth-form plasticity. These data are presented in a Shiny app to facilitate gene-expression comparisons across development in up to 14 different conditions. Collectively, our results suggest that mouth-form plasticity evolved a constrained, two-tiered logic to integrate environmental information leading up to the final developmental decision.","PeriodicalId":501246,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.12.612712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental plasticity enables the production of alternative phenotypes in response to different environmental conditions. While significant advances in understanding the ecological and evolutionary implications of plasticity have been made, understanding its genetic basis has lagged. However, a decade of genetic screens in the model nematode Pristionchus pacificus has culminated in 30 genes which affect mouth-form plasticity. We also recently reported the critical window of environmental sensitivity, and therefore have clear expectations for when differential gene expression should matter. Here, we collated previous data into a gene-regulatory network (GRN), and performed developmental transcriptomics across different environmental conditions, genetic backgrounds, and mouth-form mutants to assess the regulatory logic of plasticity. We found that only two genes in the GRN (eud-1 and seud-1/sult-1) are sensitive to the environment during the critical window. Interestingly, the time points of their sensitivity differ, suggesting that they act as sequential checkpoints. We also observed temporal constraint upon the transcriptional effects of mutating the GRN and revealed unexpected feedback between mouth-form genes. Surprisingly, expression of seud-1/sult-1, but not eud-1, correlated with mouth form biases across different strains and species. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of all samples identified metabolism as a shared pathway for regulating mouth-form plasticity. These data are presented in a Shiny app to facilitate gene-expression comparisons across development in up to 14 different conditions. Collectively, our results suggest that mouth-form plasticity evolved a constrained, two-tiered logic to integrate environmental information leading up to the final developmental decision.
Pristionchus 的发育转录组学揭示了可塑性基因调控网络的逻辑关系
发育可塑性使生物能够根据不同的环境条件产生不同的表型。虽然在理解可塑性对生态和进化的影响方面取得了重大进展,但对其遗传基础的理解却相对滞后。然而,经过十年对模式线虫 Pristionchus pacificus 的遗传筛选,最终发现了 30 个影响口形可塑性的基因。我们最近还报告了环境敏感性的临界窗口,因此对不同基因的表达何时起作用有了明确的预期。在这里,我们将以前的数据整理成一个基因调控网络(GRN),并在不同的环境条件、遗传背景和口形突变体中进行发育转录组学研究,以评估可塑性的调控逻辑。我们发现,在关键窗口期,GRN 中只有两个基因(eud-1 和 seud-1/sult-1)对环境敏感。有趣的是,这两个基因对环境敏感的时间点不同,这表明它们起到了顺序检查点的作用。我们还观察到突变 GRN 对转录效应的时间限制,并揭示了口型基因之间意想不到的反馈。令人惊讶的是,seud-1/sult-1(而非 eud-1)的表达与不同菌株和物种的口型偏差相关。最后,对所有样本的综合分析发现,新陈代谢是调节口形可塑性的共同途径。这些数据将在 Shiny 应用程序中展示,以便于在多达 14 种不同条件下对整个发育过程中的基因表达进行比较。总之,我们的研究结果表明,口形可塑性进化出了一种受限的双层逻辑,以整合环境信息,最终做出发育决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信