Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion (MIS-PALF): A Muscle-Sparing Procedure for Atlantoaxial Instability or Dislocation.

Kan-Lin Hung,Yong Lu,Yinglun Tian,Shilin Xue,Guodong Gao,Qiyue Gao,Nanfang Xu,Shenglin Wang
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion (MIS-PALF): A Muscle-Sparing Procedure for Atlantoaxial Instability or Dislocation.","authors":"Kan-Lin Hung,Yong Lu,Yinglun Tian,Shilin Xue,Guodong Gao,Qiyue Gao,Nanfang Xu,Shenglin Wang","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.23.01464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nConventional surgical procedures for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (AAI/D) have been associated with a high prevalence of postoperative occipitocervical pain and dysfunction, as well as substantial perioperative blood loss. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion (MIS-PALF), a procedure that can largely avoid disruption of suboccipital musculature, would be superior to the standard Goel-Harms technique in terms of postoperative pain and perioperative blood loss.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing MIS-PALF for AAI/D at Peking University Third Hospital's Department of Orthopaedics from January 2021 to December 2021 and a historical control group of patients with the same diagnoses who were treated with the Goel-Harms technique. The duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative body temperature, pain, supplementary use of narcotics, spinal cord function/improvement (assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores), reduction of AAI/D (determined based on radiographic parameters), rate of successful fusion, and complication rate were all compared between the 2 groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNo significant differences were noted between the groups (43 MIS-PALF cases, 86 control cases) regarding baseline data, operative time, spinal cord function or improvement, reduction of AAI/D, rate of successful fusion, and complication rate. MIS-PALF was associated with significantly less perioperative blood loss, a shorter postoperative hospital stay (decreased by 30.8%), lower intensity and frequency of postoperative pain (decreased by 10.6% and 61.9%, respectively), less need for supplementary narcotics, and less frequent postoperative fever (decreased by 48.7%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis was the first prospective cohort study of which we are aware on minimally invasive procedures for atlantoaxial fusion. Clinical efficacy (AAI/D reduction, rate of successful atlantoaxial fusion, JOA score improvement), efficiency (operative time), and safety (complications) of MIS-PALF appeared to be noninferior to those of the Goel-Harms technique. MIS-PALF was superior in terms of postoperative occipitocervical pain and length of hospital stay, both of which directly affect overall patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery of quality of life.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.01464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Conventional surgical procedures for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (AAI/D) have been associated with a high prevalence of postoperative occipitocervical pain and dysfunction, as well as substantial perioperative blood loss. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion (MIS-PALF), a procedure that can largely avoid disruption of suboccipital musculature, would be superior to the standard Goel-Harms technique in terms of postoperative pain and perioperative blood loss. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing MIS-PALF for AAI/D at Peking University Third Hospital's Department of Orthopaedics from January 2021 to December 2021 and a historical control group of patients with the same diagnoses who were treated with the Goel-Harms technique. The duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative body temperature, pain, supplementary use of narcotics, spinal cord function/improvement (assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores), reduction of AAI/D (determined based on radiographic parameters), rate of successful fusion, and complication rate were all compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS No significant differences were noted between the groups (43 MIS-PALF cases, 86 control cases) regarding baseline data, operative time, spinal cord function or improvement, reduction of AAI/D, rate of successful fusion, and complication rate. MIS-PALF was associated with significantly less perioperative blood loss, a shorter postoperative hospital stay (decreased by 30.8%), lower intensity and frequency of postoperative pain (decreased by 10.6% and 61.9%, respectively), less need for supplementary narcotics, and less frequent postoperative fever (decreased by 48.7%). CONCLUSIONS This was the first prospective cohort study of which we are aware on minimally invasive procedures for atlantoaxial fusion. Clinical efficacy (AAI/D reduction, rate of successful atlantoaxial fusion, JOA score improvement), efficiency (operative time), and safety (complications) of MIS-PALF appeared to be noninferior to those of the Goel-Harms technique. MIS-PALF was superior in terms of postoperative occipitocervical pain and length of hospital stay, both of which directly affect overall patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery of quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
寰枢椎后侧肿块关节融合微创手术(MIS-PALF):治疗寰枢椎失稳或脱位的少用肌肉手术。
背景寰枢椎不稳或脱位(AAI/D)的传统手术治疗与术后枕颈部疼痛和功能障碍的高发生率以及大量围手术期失血有关。我们假设,后方寰枢椎外侧肿块关节融合术(MIS-PALF)的微创手术能在很大程度上避免破坏枕下肌肉组织,在术后疼痛和围手术期失血方面将优于标准的 Goel-Harms 技术。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是2021年1月至2021年12月在北京大学第三医院骨科接受MIS-PALF治疗AAI/D的患者,以及采用Goel-Harms技术治疗的具有相同诊断的历史对照组患者。两组患者的手术时间、围手术期失血量、术后住院时间、术后体温、疼痛、辅助麻醉剂使用、脊髓功能/改善(使用日本骨科协会[JOA]评分进行评估)、AAI/D降低(根据放射学参数确定)、融合成功率和并发症发生率均进行了比较。结果 两组(43 例 MIS-PALF 病例,86 例对照组病例)在基线数据、手术时间、脊髓功能或改善程度、AAI/D 降低程度、融合成功率和并发症发生率方面均无明显差异。MIS-PALF与围手术期失血量明显减少、术后住院时间缩短(减少了30.8%)、术后疼痛强度和频率降低(分别减少了10.6%和61.9%)、对辅助麻醉剂的需求减少以及术后发热频率降低(减少了48.7%)相关。MIS-PALF的临床疗效(AAI/D降低率、寰枢关节融合成功率、JOA评分改善率)、效率(手术时间)和安全性(并发症)似乎不逊于Goel-Harms技术。MIS-PALF在术后枕颈部疼痛和住院时间方面更胜一筹,而这两方面都会直接影响患者的整体满意度和术后生活质量的恢复。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信