Evaluating Treatment Prioritization Rules via Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effects

IF 3 1区数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY

Journal of the American Statistical Association Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1080/01621459.2024.2393466

Steve Yadlowsky, Scott Fleming, Nigam Shah, Emma Brunskill, Stefan Wager

引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are a number of available methods for selecting whom to prioritize for treatment, including ones based on treatment effect estimation, risk scoring, and hand-crafted rules. We propose rank-we...

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过加权平均治疗效果评估治疗优先级规则

目前有多种方法可用于选择优先治疗对象，包括基于治疗效果估计、风险评分和手工制定规则的方法。我们提出了 "等级-我们"（rank-we...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American Statistical Association 数学-统计学与概率论

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

8.10%

发文量

168

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： Established in 1888 and published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, the Journal of the American Statistical Association ( JASA ) has long been considered the premier journal of statistical science. Articles focus on statistical applications, theory, and methods in economic, social, physical, engineering, and health sciences. Important books contributing to statistical advancement are reviewed in JASA . JASA is indexed in Current Index to Statistics and MathSci Online and reviewed in Mathematical Reviews. JASA is abstracted by Access Company and is indexed and abstracted in the SRM Database of Social Research Methodology.