Refining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Chun Ming How, Jack Chi-Ho Ip, Dumas Deconinck, Meihong Zhao, Meng Yan, Jinping Cheng, Kenneth Mei Yee Leung, Leo Lai Chan, Jian-Wen Qiu
{"title":"Refining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers","authors":"Chun Ming How,&nbsp;Jack Chi-Ho Ip,&nbsp;Dumas Deconinck,&nbsp;Meihong Zhao,&nbsp;Meng Yan,&nbsp;Jinping Cheng,&nbsp;Kenneth Mei Yee Leung,&nbsp;Leo Lai Chan,&nbsp;Jian-Wen Qiu","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The environmental DNA (eDNA) approach is an emerging tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. However, the sampling effort needs optimization according to the site characteristics and target taxonomic groups. In this study, we optimized the eDNA sampling effort in terms of sample volume and number of replicates to monitor the diversity of marine vertebrates (mainly fish) in Hong Kong's subtropical waters that show a gradient of estuarine to oceanic waters. To maximize detection, we used three pairs of metabarcoding primers (12S-v5, MiFish-U, and MiFish-E). We compared vertebrate diversity in 78 water samples, ranging from 1 to 10 L, collected from oceanic and estuarine sites. Metabarcoding yielded a total of 140 vertebrate species, of which 18 were unique to the estuarine site, 66 unique to the oceanic site, and 56 shared between both sites. The detected species were predominantly ray-finned fish (136 species), and the three primer pairs exhibited differential sensitivity toward different taxa, especially cartilaginous fish and cetaceans. Increasing sampling volume per replicate generally increased the total detected species, average species per replicate, and species coverage, and sampling 3 or 4 × 4 L represented the most efficient sampling effort for the estuarine and oceanic sites, respectively. The diversity analysis revealed that sampling &gt;2 L per replicate reduced variability and improved diversity analysis. The results also showed that a larger sampling volume per replicate increased the probability of detecting endangered, indicator, invasive, and elusive species, with 4 L representing the most efficient volume. This study recommended sampling 4 L per replicate and 3 replicates for estuarine and 4 for oceanic sites, respectively for effectively monitoring marine fish in subtropical waters using the eDNA approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental DNA (eDNA) approach is an emerging tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. However, the sampling effort needs optimization according to the site characteristics and target taxonomic groups. In this study, we optimized the eDNA sampling effort in terms of sample volume and number of replicates to monitor the diversity of marine vertebrates (mainly fish) in Hong Kong's subtropical waters that show a gradient of estuarine to oceanic waters. To maximize detection, we used three pairs of metabarcoding primers (12S-v5, MiFish-U, and MiFish-E). We compared vertebrate diversity in 78 water samples, ranging from 1 to 10 L, collected from oceanic and estuarine sites. Metabarcoding yielded a total of 140 vertebrate species, of which 18 were unique to the estuarine site, 66 unique to the oceanic site, and 56 shared between both sites. The detected species were predominantly ray-finned fish (136 species), and the three primer pairs exhibited differential sensitivity toward different taxa, especially cartilaginous fish and cetaceans. Increasing sampling volume per replicate generally increased the total detected species, average species per replicate, and species coverage, and sampling 3 or 4 × 4 L represented the most efficient sampling effort for the estuarine and oceanic sites, respectively. The diversity analysis revealed that sampling >2 L per replicate reduced variability and improved diversity analysis. The results also showed that a larger sampling volume per replicate increased the probability of detecting endangered, indicator, invasive, and elusive species, with 4 L representing the most efficient volume. This study recommended sampling 4 L per replicate and 3 replicates for estuarine and 4 for oceanic sites, respectively for effectively monitoring marine fish in subtropical waters using the eDNA approach.

Abstract Image

利用环境 DNA 和多种引物改进亚热带城市河口和海洋水域鱼类多样性评估的采样工作
环境 DNA(eDNA)方法是一种新兴的海洋生物多样性监测工具。然而,采样工作需要根据地点特征和目标分类群进行优化。在这项研究中,我们从样本量和重复次数两方面优化了 eDNA 采样工作,以监测香港亚热带水域从河口水域到海洋水域梯度分布的海洋脊椎动物(主要是鱼类)的多样性。为了最大限度地提高检测效率,我们使用了三对元条码引物(12S-v5、MiFish-U 和 MiFish-E)。我们比较了从海洋水域和河口水域采集的 78 份 1 至 10 升水样中的脊椎动物多样性。元条码共产生了 140 个脊椎动物物种,其中 18 个为河口站点所独有,66 个为海洋站点所独有,56 个为两个站点所共有。检测到的物种主要是鳐鳍鱼类(136 种),三种引物对不同类群的敏感性不同,尤其是软骨鱼类和鲸类。增加每个重复的取样量通常会增加检测到的物种总数、每个重复的平均物种数和物种覆盖率,在河口和海洋地点,3 或 4 × 4 L 的取样量分别代表了最有效的取样量。多样性分析表明,每个重复取样 2 L 可减少变异性并改进多样性分析。结果还显示,每个重复的取样量越大,检测到濒危物种、指示性物种、入侵物种和难以捉摸物种的概率就越高,其中 4 升的取样量效率最高。本研究建议,使用 eDNA 方法有效监测亚热带水域的海洋鱼类时,每个重复取样 4 升,河口地点取样 3 个重复,海洋地点取样 4 个重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信