{"title":"Experimental study on flow patterns and pressure gradient of decaying swirling gas-liquid flow in a horizontal pipe","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The utilization of swirling flow in multiphase flow devices is prevalent for purposes such as mixing, separation, stabilization, and heat transfer enhancement, primarily owing to its characteristic of inducing low-pressure drop. In the nuclear industry, for example, two-phase swirling flow is applied in the nuclear gas generator to improve gas quality. In this study, an experimental investigation was conducted on the decaying swirling flow of gas-liquid in a horizontal pipe equipped with a vane-type swirler. The flow patterns were visually examined, and the pressure gradients along the test pipe and across the swirler were measured. The findings suggest the presence of four distinct swirling flow patterns at the swirler outlet (z/D = 0), namely chain flow, swirling gas column flow, swirling intermittent flow, and swirling annular flow. Because of swirl decay, these swirling flows recover their original pattern approximately 70<em>D</em> downstream from the swirler, with the exception of the swirling gas column flow. The flow regime maps at <em>z</em>/<em>D</em> = 10, 40, 70 and 100 are proposed and the pattern-based pressure gradient characteristics are analyzed. It is shown that the pressure gradient rises as both gas superficial velocity (<em>j</em><sub>g</sub>) and liquid superficial velocity (<em>j</em><sub>l</sub>) increase. The largest pressure gradient occurs within the swirler section, while the lowest is found upstream of the swirler. Near the swirler outlet (<em>z</em>/<em>D</em> = 0–33), the pressure gradient is approximately 1.5–2.3 times higher than at <em>z</em>/<em>D</em> = 33–67. Further downstream, at <em>z</em>/<em>D</em> = 67–100, it is 2.2–3.5 times greater, depending on the flow patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024003950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The utilization of swirling flow in multiphase flow devices is prevalent for purposes such as mixing, separation, stabilization, and heat transfer enhancement, primarily owing to its characteristic of inducing low-pressure drop. In the nuclear industry, for example, two-phase swirling flow is applied in the nuclear gas generator to improve gas quality. In this study, an experimental investigation was conducted on the decaying swirling flow of gas-liquid in a horizontal pipe equipped with a vane-type swirler. The flow patterns were visually examined, and the pressure gradients along the test pipe and across the swirler were measured. The findings suggest the presence of four distinct swirling flow patterns at the swirler outlet (z/D = 0), namely chain flow, swirling gas column flow, swirling intermittent flow, and swirling annular flow. Because of swirl decay, these swirling flows recover their original pattern approximately 70D downstream from the swirler, with the exception of the swirling gas column flow. The flow regime maps at z/D = 10, 40, 70 and 100 are proposed and the pattern-based pressure gradient characteristics are analyzed. It is shown that the pressure gradient rises as both gas superficial velocity (jg) and liquid superficial velocity (jl) increase. The largest pressure gradient occurs within the swirler section, while the lowest is found upstream of the swirler. Near the swirler outlet (z/D = 0–33), the pressure gradient is approximately 1.5–2.3 times higher than at z/D = 33–67. Further downstream, at z/D = 67–100, it is 2.2–3.5 times greater, depending on the flow patterns.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.