Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
{"title":"Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars are usually manufactured with diverse surface configurations to increase their bond to surrounding matrix. The bond performance is highly dependent on many factors such as the fibre type, surface configuration and environmental conditions. In this research, the bond performance of glass and carbon FRP bars were comparatively analysed to estimate their potentials in marine concrete, with the aim of mechanical and economic considerations. Influences from the w/c ratio change and harmful seawater solutes of Cl<sup>-</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> were explored. Impact of the revealed bond interface failure modes on the concrete member strength was examined via three-point bending test using beams with FRP bars as the flexural reinforcement. GFRP bars were measured to achieve an ultimate bond stress ∼4 times higher than CFRP bars, induced from their bond interface failure difference that occurred at the surface-rib-to-concrete for GFRP bars and at the surface-coating-to-interior-FRP for CFRP bars. The reduced w/c ratio increased the bond stress of CFRP bars while the accelerated chloride and sulfate exposures mainly reduced the initial bond stress of GFRP bars. Generally, the interface bond failure that happened at the surface-rib-to-concrete by GFRP bars exhibited better strength development and reinforcing effectiveness than that at the interior-FRP-to-coating for CFRP bars. This research concluded by estimating factors that manifested the bond performance and reinforcing effectiveness difference between tested GFRP and CFRP bars. These factors combined results from the pull-out and three-point bending tests, providing a more holistic approach to compare the FRP bar interface bond performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014255/pdfft?md5=afe13c1ea75a97d47e2c00abdf014b22&pid=1-s2.0-S2352012424014255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars are usually manufactured with diverse surface configurations to increase their bond to surrounding matrix. The bond performance is highly dependent on many factors such as the fibre type, surface configuration and environmental conditions. In this research, the bond performance of glass and carbon FRP bars were comparatively analysed to estimate their potentials in marine concrete, with the aim of mechanical and economic considerations. Influences from the w/c ratio change and harmful seawater solutes of Cl- and SO42- were explored. Impact of the revealed bond interface failure modes on the concrete member strength was examined via three-point bending test using beams with FRP bars as the flexural reinforcement. GFRP bars were measured to achieve an ultimate bond stress ∼4 times higher than CFRP bars, induced from their bond interface failure difference that occurred at the surface-rib-to-concrete for GFRP bars and at the surface-coating-to-interior-FRP for CFRP bars. The reduced w/c ratio increased the bond stress of CFRP bars while the accelerated chloride and sulfate exposures mainly reduced the initial bond stress of GFRP bars. Generally, the interface bond failure that happened at the surface-rib-to-concrete by GFRP bars exhibited better strength development and reinforcing effectiveness than that at the interior-FRP-to-coating for CFRP bars. This research concluded by estimating factors that manifested the bond performance and reinforcing effectiveness difference between tested GFRP and CFRP bars. These factors combined results from the pull-out and three-point bending tests, providing a more holistic approach to compare the FRP bar interface bond performance.

用于海工混凝土的 GFRP 和 CFRP 钢筋比较分析:对粘结性能影响的见解
纤维增强聚合物(FRP)棒材通常采用不同的表面构造,以增加其与周围基体的粘结力。粘结性能在很大程度上取决于多种因素,如纤维类型、表面结构和环境条件。本研究对玻璃和碳玻璃钢条的粘结性能进行了比较分析,以估计其在海工混凝土中的应用潜力,目的是考虑到机械和经济因素。研究还探讨了水灰比变化以及 Cl- 和 SO42- 等有害海水溶质的影响。通过使用玻璃纤维增强塑料条作为抗弯钢筋的梁进行三点弯曲试验,研究了所揭示的粘接界面失效模式对混凝土构件强度的影响。经测量,GFRP 杆件的极限粘结应力比 CFRP 杆件高出 4 倍,这是因为它们的粘结界面失效模式不同,GFRP 杆件的失效模式发生在表面-肋-混凝土之间,而 CFRP 杆件的失效模式发生在表面-涂层-内部-FRP 之间。降低的水灰比增加了 CFRP 钢筋的粘结应力,而加速氯化物和硫酸盐暴露则主要降低了 GFRP 钢筋的初始粘结应力。一般来说,GFRP 钢筋表面-肋-混凝土的界面粘结失效比 CFRP 钢筋内部-FRP-涂层的界面粘结失效表现出更好的强度发展和加固效果。本研究最后估算了导致 GFRP 和 CFRP 条材粘结性能和加固效果差异的因素。这些因素结合了拉出试验和三点弯曲试验的结果,为比较玻璃纤维增强塑料条的界面粘接性能提供了更全面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信