Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recent years, a growing body of literature on informal caregivers’ health and well-being has emerged, highlighting the need for a tool to measure their self-care practices.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to develop a theory-based instrument measuring the self-care behaviors of informal caregivers and test its psychometric properties.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The initial phase of instrument development entailed a detailed, six-step process (conceptualization, theoretical adaptation, back-translation and cultural adaptation, cognitive interviewing, item enhancement, and content validity), followed by formal psychometric testing (participant engagement, validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability).</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Study conducted at a hospital located in Tehran, Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A sample of 234 informal caregivers of cancer outpatients receiving treatment in oncology wards was enrolled. Caregivers had to be 18 years or older, recognized as the primary caregiver by the patient, and willing to provide informed consent.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory items comprise three dimensions: self-care maintenance (11 items), self-care monitoring (7 items), and self-care management (9 items), which achieved a content validity index rating of 100 % in a panel of experts. Data were collected from caregivers during routine clinic visits. Construct validity was verified through exploratory structural equation modelling and reliability was verified using Cronbach's α and multidimensional model-based reliability. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All three dimensions showed good model fit indices (self-care maintenance: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.044; self-care monitoring: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.027; self-care management: Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.048) and Cronbach's α of 0.88, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively. The overall multidimensional model-based reliability was 0.93. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for the three dimensions were 0.94, 0.60, and 0.51, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preliminary testing provides support for use of the Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory in research. Using this theory-based instrument to assess the self-care practices of informal caregivers can assist in identifying topics to discuss and opportunities for guidance.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable Abstract</h3><p>The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory: A validated tool for informal caregivers is useful for research. #Informalcaregivers #SelfCare</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2400064X/pdfft?md5=1e6a17b03d9c55bd8b402262b3321c17&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X2400064X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2400064X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, a growing body of literature on informal caregivers’ health and well-being has emerged, highlighting the need for a tool to measure their self-care practices.

Objective

The aim of the study was to develop a theory-based instrument measuring the self-care behaviors of informal caregivers and test its psychometric properties.

Design

The initial phase of instrument development entailed a detailed, six-step process (conceptualization, theoretical adaptation, back-translation and cultural adaptation, cognitive interviewing, item enhancement, and content validity), followed by formal psychometric testing (participant engagement, validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability).

Setting

Study conducted at a hospital located in Tehran, Iran.

Participants

A sample of 234 informal caregivers of cancer outpatients receiving treatment in oncology wards was enrolled. Caregivers had to be 18 years or older, recognized as the primary caregiver by the patient, and willing to provide informed consent.

Methods

The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory items comprise three dimensions: self-care maintenance (11 items), self-care monitoring (7 items), and self-care management (9 items), which achieved a content validity index rating of 100 % in a panel of experts. Data were collected from caregivers during routine clinic visits. Construct validity was verified through exploratory structural equation modelling and reliability was verified using Cronbach's α and multidimensional model-based reliability. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

Results

All three dimensions showed good model fit indices (self-care maintenance: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.044; self-care monitoring: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.027; self-care management: Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.048) and Cronbach's α of 0.88, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively. The overall multidimensional model-based reliability was 0.93. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for the three dimensions were 0.94, 0.60, and 0.51, respectively.

Conclusion

Preliminary testing provides support for use of the Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory in research. Using this theory-based instrument to assess the self-care practices of informal caregivers can assist in identifying topics to discuss and opportunities for guidance.

Tweetable Abstract

The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory: A validated tool for informal caregivers is useful for research. #Informalcaregivers #SelfCare

背景近年来,有关非正规护理人员的健康和福祉的文献越来越多,这凸显了人们对衡量其自我护理行为的工具的需求。目的本研究旨在开发一种基于理论的工具,用于衡量非正规护理人员的自我护理行为,并测试其心理测量特性。设计工具开发的初始阶段需要经过详细的六步流程(概念化、理论调整、回译和文化调整、认知访谈、项目增强和内容效度),然后进行正式的心理测试(参与者参与、有效性、内部一致性可靠性、测试重复可靠性)。方法非正规护理人员自我护理量表的项目包括三个方面:自我护理维护(11 个项目)、自我护理监测(7 个项目)和自我护理管理(9 个项目)。数据是在常规门诊就诊时从护理人员处收集的。通过探索性结构方程模型验证了结构效度,并使用克朗巴赫α和基于多维模型的信度验证了信度。结果 所有三个维度均显示出良好的模型拟合指数(自我保健维护:比较拟合指数 = 1.0):比较拟合指数 = 1.00,Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.99,近似均方根误差 = 0.044;自我护理监测:比较拟合指数 = 1.00,Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.99,近似均方根误差 = 0.044:比较拟合指数 = 1.00,塔克-刘易斯指数 = 1.00,近似均方根误差 = 0.027;自我护理管理:比较拟合指数 = 0.99,塔克-刘易斯指数 = 0.99,近似均方根误差 = 0.048)和克朗巴赫α分别为 0.88、0.88 和 0.91。基于多维模型的总体信度为 0.93。三个维度的类内相关系数分别为 0.94、0.60 和 0.51。使用这一基于理论的工具来评估非正规护理人员的自我护理实践,有助于确定讨论主题和指导机会:非正式照顾者自我照顾量表:非正式照顾者的有效工具有助于研究。#非正式照顾者 #自我照顾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信