Do cyclists disregard ‘priority-to-the-right’ more often than motorists?

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Meng Zhang, Max Theisen
{"title":"Do cyclists disregard ‘priority-to-the-right’ more often than motorists?","authors":"Meng Zhang,&nbsp;Max Theisen","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration of autonomous driving into mixed traffic environments poses unique challenges, especially at unsignalized intersections where communication and cooperation with human road users is necessary. This study addresses a critical research gap by investigating the adherence to the “priority-to-the-right” rule at an urban unsignalized intersection, comparing behavioral patterns of cyclists and motorists. Utilizing stationary mounted cameras, a 12-day traffic observation of an urban T-intersection in Braunschweig, Germany, was conducted. The class and the trajectory of road users as well as their scenarios were identified. In 202 cases, cars appearing from the right (ego, with priority) encountered cars or bikes coming from the left (foe, without priority). The study analyzed the impact of variables, ego’s direction, foe’s class and lateral position and their arrival time on their passing order through descriptive statistics and logistic regression. The findings reveal that cyclists disregard the “priority-to-the-right” rule more often than motorists. Additionally, road users who have the priority are more likely to yield when turning right, arriving at the intersection later, and encountering an opposing road user who is close to the center of the road. This study highlights the importance of implicit communication in traffic and provides essential benchmarks for developing more human-like autonomous driving systems, capable of interpreting and responding to nuanced road user interactions at unsignalized intersections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 413-423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002614/pdfft?md5=c733e09c97c58e03d7eebd83e12004e3&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002614-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of autonomous driving into mixed traffic environments poses unique challenges, especially at unsignalized intersections where communication and cooperation with human road users is necessary. This study addresses a critical research gap by investigating the adherence to the “priority-to-the-right” rule at an urban unsignalized intersection, comparing behavioral patterns of cyclists and motorists. Utilizing stationary mounted cameras, a 12-day traffic observation of an urban T-intersection in Braunschweig, Germany, was conducted. The class and the trajectory of road users as well as their scenarios were identified. In 202 cases, cars appearing from the right (ego, with priority) encountered cars or bikes coming from the left (foe, without priority). The study analyzed the impact of variables, ego’s direction, foe’s class and lateral position and their arrival time on their passing order through descriptive statistics and logistic regression. The findings reveal that cyclists disregard the “priority-to-the-right” rule more often than motorists. Additionally, road users who have the priority are more likely to yield when turning right, arriving at the intersection later, and encountering an opposing road user who is close to the center of the road. This study highlights the importance of implicit communication in traffic and provides essential benchmarks for developing more human-like autonomous driving systems, capable of interpreting and responding to nuanced road user interactions at unsignalized intersections.

骑自行车的人比开车的人更经常无视 "右侧优先 "吗?
自动驾驶融入混合交通环境带来了独特的挑战,尤其是在无信号灯的交叉路口,因为在那里需要与人类道路使用者进行交流与合作。本研究通过比较骑自行车者和驾车者的行为模式,调查在城市无信号交叉路口遵守 "右侧优先 "规则的情况,填补了这一关键的研究空白。利用固定安装的摄像头,对德国布伦瑞克的一个城市 T 型交叉口进行了为期 12 天的交通观察。研究确定了道路使用者的类别、轨迹及其使用场景。在 202 个案例中,从右侧驶来的汽车(自我,有优先权)与从左侧驶来的汽车或自行车(敌人,无优先权)相遇。研究通过描述性统计和逻辑回归分析了各种变量、自我的方向、敌人的等级和横向位置以及到达时间对其通过顺序的影响。研究结果表明,骑自行车的人比开车的人更经常无视 "右侧优先 "规则。此外,拥有优先权的道路使用者在右转时更有可能让行、更晚到达交叉路口,以及遇到靠近道路中心的对向道路使用者。这项研究强调了交通中隐性交流的重要性,并为开发更像人类的自动驾驶系统提供了重要基准,使其能够在无信号灯的交叉路口解释和应对细微的道路使用者互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信