Impact of new lighting technology versus traditional fluorescent bulbs on sedation and delirium in the ICU

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"Impact of new lighting technology versus traditional fluorescent bulbs on sedation and delirium in the ICU","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Critically ill patients frequently encounter disruptions in their circadian rhythms in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment. New lighting systems have been developed to enhance daytime light levels and to promote circadian alignment.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the impact of implementing an innovative lighting technology that mimics natural light and reproduce the colour of the sky.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, observational, non-randomized comparative trial. ICU patients were exposed to either a cutting-edge lighting system based on new technology (intervention group) or a conventional lighting system using fluorescent bulbs (control group).</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>An Italian intensive care unit with ten beds and five windowless rooms, thereby denying access to natural light. Three rooms had new lighting technology.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The two groups were compared to assess the prevalence or absence of delirium and the need for sedatives during ICU stay. The secondary aim was to assess the presence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>86 patients were included: 52 (60 %) in the intervention group and 34 (40 %) in the control group. Seventy-nine patients (82 %) were alive at ICU discharge. Fourteen patients (16 %) developed delirium (intervention group: n = 8 [15 %] vs. control group: n = 6 [18 %] in the control group, (P=0.781). The use of sedative drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents was similar in both the groups. No differences in the incidence of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorders were observed among patients who underwent follow-up visits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to traditional fluorescent tube lighting, the innovative lighting system did not provide any significant benefit in reducing the frequency of delirium or the necessity for sedative medications.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><p>A single intervention, the use of lights that mimic sunny light and the sky, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of delirium. Delirium has a multifactorial aetiology, necessitating interventions that are multifaceted and address different domains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724002180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Critically ill patients frequently encounter disruptions in their circadian rhythms in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment. New lighting systems have been developed to enhance daytime light levels and to promote circadian alignment.

Objectives

To investigate the impact of implementing an innovative lighting technology that mimics natural light and reproduce the colour of the sky.

Design

Prospective, observational, non-randomized comparative trial. ICU patients were exposed to either a cutting-edge lighting system based on new technology (intervention group) or a conventional lighting system using fluorescent bulbs (control group).

Setting

An Italian intensive care unit with ten beds and five windowless rooms, thereby denying access to natural light. Three rooms had new lighting technology.

Main Outcome Measures

The two groups were compared to assess the prevalence or absence of delirium and the need for sedatives during ICU stay. The secondary aim was to assess the presence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge.

Results

86 patients were included: 52 (60 %) in the intervention group and 34 (40 %) in the control group. Seventy-nine patients (82 %) were alive at ICU discharge. Fourteen patients (16 %) developed delirium (intervention group: n = 8 [15 %] vs. control group: n = 6 [18 %] in the control group, (P=0.781). The use of sedative drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents was similar in both the groups. No differences in the incidence of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorders were observed among patients who underwent follow-up visits.

Conclusions

Compared to traditional fluorescent tube lighting, the innovative lighting system did not provide any significant benefit in reducing the frequency of delirium or the necessity for sedative medications.

Implications for Clinical Practice

A single intervention, the use of lights that mimic sunny light and the sky, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of delirium. Delirium has a multifactorial aetiology, necessitating interventions that are multifaceted and address different domains.

背景重症患者在重症监护室(ICU)环境中经常会遇到昼夜节律紊乱的问题。目标研究采用模仿自然光和再现天空颜色的创新照明技术的影响。设计前瞻性、观察性、非随机比较试验。重症监护病房的患者被分配到基于新技术的先进照明系统(干预组)或使用荧光灯的传统照明系统(对照组)。主要结果测量两组患者在重症监护室住院期间的谵妄发生率和镇静剂需求量进行了比较。次要目的是评估患者在重症监护室出院后 3、6 和 12 个月时是否存在焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍:干预组 52 人(60%),对照组 34 人(40%)。79 名患者(82%)在重症监护室出院时仍然存活。14名患者(16%)出现谵妄(干预组:n = 8 [15 %] vs. 对照组:n = 6 [18 %],P=0.781)。两组患者使用镇静药物和神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况相似。结论与传统的荧光灯管照明相比,创新型照明系统在降低谵妄发生率或镇静药物使用必要性方面并无明显优势。谵妄的病因是多因素的,因此需要针对不同领域采取多方面的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信