Multi-stream FPV-LES modeling of ammonia/coal co-firing on a semi-industrial scale complex burner with pre-heated secondary, tertiary, and staged combustion air

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Sujeet Yadav , Panlong Yu , Kenji Tanno , Hiroaki Watanabe
{"title":"Multi-stream FPV-LES modeling of ammonia/coal co-firing on a semi-industrial scale complex burner with pre-heated secondary, tertiary, and staged combustion air","authors":"Sujeet Yadav ,&nbsp;Panlong Yu ,&nbsp;Kenji Tanno ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study investigates ammonia/coal co-firing using a non-adiabatic multi-stream flamelet/progress variable (FPV) approach on a 760 kWth semi-industrial test furnace of Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI). The furnace features an advanced low NO<sub>x</sub> CI-α burner with preheated secondary, tertiary, and staged combustion air streams, closely resembling conditions in commercial-scale power plant burners. Two ammonia injection cases are investigated, one where ammonia is injected through the burner and the other where it is injected through a measurement port positioned 1.0 m downstream, both at a fixed ammonia co-firing ratio of 20 % based on LHV. To address varying oxidizer stream temperatures for primary, secondary, tertiary, and staged air streams, an additional dimension is introduced to the flamelet chemtable. The thermochemical space has seven dimensions, three for fuel mixture fractions (volatile matter, char off-gases, and ammonia), and dimensions for the mixture fraction variance, reaction progress variable, total enthalpy, and oxidizer temperature. The seven-dimensional non-adiabatic (7D-NA) FPV-LES model's accuracy is assessed by comparing its predictions with measured data as well as with previous modelling results that had certain limitations, such as six- dimensional non-adiabatic (6D-NA) FPV-LES model that ignored difference in oxidizer temperature and five-dimensional adiabatic (5D-AD) FPV-LES model that ignored both difference in oxidizer temperature and heat loss in flamelet chemtable. In both cases of ammonia injection, 7D NA-FPV-LES model improved over previous model's predictions by accurately capturing the burner exit flow field. It successfully identified trend between the two cases, predicting a slightly higher peak temperature near burner exit in case injecting ammonia through downstream due to development of stronger internal recirculation zone. Results showed peak NO notably higher and closer to burner when ammonia injected through downstream, consistent with measured data due to prevalence of NO reduction for ammonia injected through burner in proximity of burner.</p></div><div><h3>Novelty and significance statement</h3><p>The novelty of this research is that it introduces an approach that can be accurately applied to the FPV-LES modeling of actual commercial power plant burners with highly complex oxidizer streams at varying temperatures. This approach has been validated on the complex CI-α burner of the CRIEPI test furnace of semi-industrial scale, which has preheated secondary, tertiary, and staged air streams, resembling actual conditions encountered in commercial power plant burners. The proposed approach can consider multiple oxidizer streams and it can also consider variation in oxidizer composition (although oxidizer composition is fixed in this study). This research will be significant in adoption of multi-mixture fraction FPV-LES approach to complex burners of commercial power plants. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights into ammonia/coal co-firing in a semi-industrial scale furnace with complex burner, aligning with global decarbonization goals, emphasizing the utilization of zero-carbon fuels like ammonia in actual scale commercial power plants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":280,"journal":{"name":"Combustion and Flame","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 113729"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218024004383/pdfft?md5=cbca95d18d8949a32685220bdf17434d&pid=1-s2.0-S0010218024004383-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion and Flame","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218024004383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates ammonia/coal co-firing using a non-adiabatic multi-stream flamelet/progress variable (FPV) approach on a 760 kWth semi-industrial test furnace of Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI). The furnace features an advanced low NOx CI-α burner with preheated secondary, tertiary, and staged combustion air streams, closely resembling conditions in commercial-scale power plant burners. Two ammonia injection cases are investigated, one where ammonia is injected through the burner and the other where it is injected through a measurement port positioned 1.0 m downstream, both at a fixed ammonia co-firing ratio of 20 % based on LHV. To address varying oxidizer stream temperatures for primary, secondary, tertiary, and staged air streams, an additional dimension is introduced to the flamelet chemtable. The thermochemical space has seven dimensions, three for fuel mixture fractions (volatile matter, char off-gases, and ammonia), and dimensions for the mixture fraction variance, reaction progress variable, total enthalpy, and oxidizer temperature. The seven-dimensional non-adiabatic (7D-NA) FPV-LES model's accuracy is assessed by comparing its predictions with measured data as well as with previous modelling results that had certain limitations, such as six- dimensional non-adiabatic (6D-NA) FPV-LES model that ignored difference in oxidizer temperature and five-dimensional adiabatic (5D-AD) FPV-LES model that ignored both difference in oxidizer temperature and heat loss in flamelet chemtable. In both cases of ammonia injection, 7D NA-FPV-LES model improved over previous model's predictions by accurately capturing the burner exit flow field. It successfully identified trend between the two cases, predicting a slightly higher peak temperature near burner exit in case injecting ammonia through downstream due to development of stronger internal recirculation zone. Results showed peak NO notably higher and closer to burner when ammonia injected through downstream, consistent with measured data due to prevalence of NO reduction for ammonia injected through burner in proximity of burner.

Novelty and significance statement

The novelty of this research is that it introduces an approach that can be accurately applied to the FPV-LES modeling of actual commercial power plant burners with highly complex oxidizer streams at varying temperatures. This approach has been validated on the complex CI-α burner of the CRIEPI test furnace of semi-industrial scale, which has preheated secondary, tertiary, and staged air streams, resembling actual conditions encountered in commercial power plant burners. The proposed approach can consider multiple oxidizer streams and it can also consider variation in oxidizer composition (although oxidizer composition is fixed in this study). This research will be significant in adoption of multi-mixture fraction FPV-LES approach to complex burners of commercial power plants. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights into ammonia/coal co-firing in a semi-industrial scale furnace with complex burner, aligning with global decarbonization goals, emphasizing the utilization of zero-carbon fuels like ammonia in actual scale commercial power plants.

在带有预热二次、三次和分段燃烧空气的半工业规模复合燃烧器上进行氨/煤联合燃烧的多流 FPV-LES 建模
该研究在电力工业中央研究院(CRIEPI)的一台 760 kWth 半工业试验炉上采用非绝热多流火焰/进度变量(FPV)方法研究了氨/煤联合燃烧。该炉采用先进的低氮氧化物 CI-α 燃烧器,带有预热二次、三次和分段燃烧气流,与商业规模电厂燃烧器的条件非常相似。研究了两种氨气喷射情况,一种是通过燃烧器喷射氨气,另一种是通过位于下游 1.0 米处的测量端口喷射氨气,两种情况都是在基于 LHV 的 20% 固定氨气共燃比率下进行的。为了解决一次、二次、三次和分段气流中氧化剂气流温度不同的问题,小火焰化学表还引入了一个额外的维度。热化学空间有七个维度,其中三个维度为燃料混合物分数(挥发物、炭化废气和氨),另一个维度为混合物分数变量、反应进展变量、总焓和氧化剂温度。通过将七维非绝热(7D-NA)FPV-LES 模型的预测结果与实测数据以及具有一定局限性的先前建模结果(如忽略氧化剂温度差的六维非绝热(6D-NA)FPV-LES 模型和忽略氧化剂温度差和火焰小化中热量损失的五维绝热(5D-AD)FPV-LES 模型)进行比较,评估了该模型的准确性。在两种注入氨气的情况下,7D NA-FPV-LES 模型都能准确捕捉燃烧器出口流场,从而改进了之前模型的预测结果。它成功地识别了两种情况之间的趋势,预测在通过下游喷入氨水的情况下,由于内部再循环区的增强,燃烧器出口附近的峰值温度略高。结果表明,当氨水通过下游注入时,氮氧化物峰值明显更高,且更靠近燃烧器,这与测量数据一致,因为通过燃烧器注入的氨水在燃烧器附近普遍存在氮氧化物还原现象。这种方法已在半工业规模的 CRIEPI 试验炉的复杂 CI-α 燃烧器上得到验证,该燃烧器具有预热二次、三次和分段气流,与商业电厂燃烧器中遇到的实际条件相似。建议的方法可以考虑多个氧化剂流,还可以考虑氧化剂成分的变化(尽管在本研究中氧化剂成分是固定的)。这项研究对于在商业发电厂的复杂燃烧器中采用多混合分数 FPV-LES 方法具有重要意义。此外,该研究还为在带有复杂燃烧器的半工业规模熔炉中进行氨/煤联合燃烧提供了有价值的见解,符合全球去碳化目标,强调了在实际规模的商业发电厂中使用氨等零碳燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Combustion and Flame
Combustion and Flame 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
20.50%
发文量
631
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal is to publish high quality work from experimental, theoretical, and computational investigations on the fundamentals of combustion phenomena and closely allied matters. While submissions in all pertinent areas are welcomed, past and recent focus of the journal has been on: Development and validation of reaction kinetics, reduction of reaction mechanisms and modeling of combustion systems, including: Conventional, alternative and surrogate fuels; Pollutants; Particulate and aerosol formation and abatement; Heterogeneous processes. Experimental, theoretical, and computational studies of laminar and turbulent combustion phenomena, including: Premixed and non-premixed flames; Ignition and extinction phenomena; Flame propagation; Flame structure; Instabilities and swirl; Flame spread; Multi-phase reactants. Advances in diagnostic and computational methods in combustion, including: Measurement and simulation of scalar and vector properties; Novel techniques; State-of-the art applications. Fundamental investigations of combustion technologies and systems, including: Internal combustion engines; Gas turbines; Small- and large-scale stationary combustion and power generation; Catalytic combustion; Combustion synthesis; Combustion under extreme conditions; New concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信