Examining the impact of tool taper angle in Al-Si tube manufacturing by friction stir extrusion

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
{"title":"Examining the impact of tool taper angle in Al-Si tube manufacturing by friction stir extrusion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study employed Friction Stir Extrusion (FSE) on the LM13 aluminum alloy to fabricate tubes using three distinct tool head designs: cylindrical, 30° taper, and 60° taper profiles. A comprehensive analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of the resulting samples was performed. A numerical study was conducted to model the process dynamics, focusing on temperature and strain distributions, material flow patterns, and the evolution of force, torque, strain, and strain rate. Findings indicated that the axial force with the cylindrical tool was 4–5 times greater than with tapered tools, while forces for the 30° and 60° taper tools were comparable. The 30° taper tool generated the highest strain value of 280 mm/mm, which significantly enhanced the mechanical strength of the pipe up to 139 MPa while it was 85 MPa in the base metal. However, the cylindrical tool had a much higher average strain rate of around 40 1/s, compared to below 10 1/s for the tapered tools, yet it was less effective at reducing porosity and breaking Si particles due to insufficient strain. Additionally, material flow patterns differed: with the cylindrical tool, flow moved from the periphery to the center, while tapered tools directed flow from the center toward the pipe wall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691/pdfft?md5=65c439092538f1ae7bf28f7dc318380b&pid=1-s2.0-S1526612524009691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employed Friction Stir Extrusion (FSE) on the LM13 aluminum alloy to fabricate tubes using three distinct tool head designs: cylindrical, 30° taper, and 60° taper profiles. A comprehensive analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of the resulting samples was performed. A numerical study was conducted to model the process dynamics, focusing on temperature and strain distributions, material flow patterns, and the evolution of force, torque, strain, and strain rate. Findings indicated that the axial force with the cylindrical tool was 4–5 times greater than with tapered tools, while forces for the 30° and 60° taper tools were comparable. The 30° taper tool generated the highest strain value of 280 mm/mm, which significantly enhanced the mechanical strength of the pipe up to 139 MPa while it was 85 MPa in the base metal. However, the cylindrical tool had a much higher average strain rate of around 40 1/s, compared to below 10 1/s for the tapered tools, yet it was less effective at reducing porosity and breaking Si particles due to insufficient strain. Additionally, material flow patterns differed: with the cylindrical tool, flow moved from the periphery to the center, while tapered tools directed flow from the center toward the pipe wall.

研究搅拌摩擦挤压法生产铝硅管过程中工具锥角的影响
本研究在 LM13 铝合金上采用摩擦搅拌挤压 (FSE) 技术,使用三种不同的工具头设计(圆柱形、30° 锥形和 60° 锥形)制造管材。对所得样品的微观结构和机械性能进行了全面分析。此外,还进行了一项数值研究,以建立工艺动态模型,重点关注温度和应变分布、材料流动模式以及力、扭矩、应变和应变率的演变。研究结果表明,圆柱形工具的轴向力是锥形工具的 4-5 倍,而 30° 和 60° 锥形工具的轴向力相当。30° 锥形工具产生的应变值最高,为 280 毫米/毫米,这大大提高了管道的机械强度,达到 139 兆帕,而母材的机械强度仅为 85 兆帕。不过,圆柱形工具的平均应变率要高得多,约为 40 1/s,而锥形工具的平均应变率则低于 10 1/s,但由于应变不足,它在减少孔隙率和破碎硅颗粒方面的效果较差。此外,材料流动模式也不同:使用圆柱形工具时,流动从外围流向中心,而锥形工具则将流动从中心引向管壁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Journal of Manufacturing Processes ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
11.30%
发文量
833
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信