Evaluating the atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease risk score in patients with brain metastases: Associations with overall survival and high-value care outcomes

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Foad Kazemi, Jiaqi Liu, Megan Parker, Joshua Robinaugh, A. Karim Ahmed, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Christopher Jackson, Gary L. Gallia, Chetan Bettegowda, Jon Weingart, Henry Brem, Debraj Mukherjee
{"title":"Evaluating the atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease risk score in patients with brain metastases: Associations with overall survival and high-value care outcomes","authors":"Foad Kazemi,&nbsp;Jiaqi Liu,&nbsp;Megan Parker,&nbsp;Joshua Robinaugh,&nbsp;A. Karim Ahmed,&nbsp;Jordina Rincon-Torroella,&nbsp;Christopher Jackson,&nbsp;Gary L. Gallia,&nbsp;Chetan Bettegowda,&nbsp;Jon Weingart,&nbsp;Henry Brem,&nbsp;Debraj Mukherjee","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Brain metastases (BM) constitute the most common intracranial tumor in adults. Prior literature indicates the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score is associated with increased risk of cancer, potentially attributable to shared risk factors. Understanding the role of ASCVD risk scores in BM may help optimize their care and inform clinical decision-making. Our aim was to explore associations between ASCVD risk score in BM patients and their overall survival, hospital charges, and non-routine discharge disposition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical data for BM patients undergoing surgery at a single institution (2017–2021). Regression analyses were performed accordingly and maximally selected rank statistics were employed to identify an optimal cutoff for ASCVD risk scores. The random survival forest (RSF) machine learning technique identified the most important variable associated with survival outcomes in BM patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 139 patients were included with average age 62.93±9.29 years, 48.2 % male, 25.2 % with high hospital charges, and 23.7 % experiencing non-routine discharge. Among these patients, 32.3 % had prior history of an ASCVD event, while 67.7 % did not. Overall, this cohort had an average 10-year ASCVD risk score of 12.51±12.98, indicating intermediate risk of ASCVD among all BM patients. On multivariate logistic regression, prior history of ASCVD was associated with higher odds of high hospital charges (OR=3.670, p=0.018), and higher ASCVD risk scores were associated with greater odds of non-routine discharge (OR=1.059, p=0.012). On the multivariate Cox regression model, higher ASCVD risk scores correlated with worse overall survival (HR=1.031, p=0.014). A threshold of 25.1 was identified for high-risk ASCVD scores. Patients with ASCVD scores &gt;25.1 exhibited reduced overall survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.015) and multivariate Cox regression (HR: 2.811, p=0.016). Notably, ASCVD risk scores were found to be the most important variable in predicting worse survival outcomes in BM patients compared to other established frailty indices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study indicates higher ASCVD risk scores in BM patients are associated with worse overall survival. Integrating ASCVD assessment into clinical workflow may facilitate more informed risk-based decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 108549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Brain metastases (BM) constitute the most common intracranial tumor in adults. Prior literature indicates the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score is associated with increased risk of cancer, potentially attributable to shared risk factors. Understanding the role of ASCVD risk scores in BM may help optimize their care and inform clinical decision-making. Our aim was to explore associations between ASCVD risk score in BM patients and their overall survival, hospital charges, and non-routine discharge disposition.

Methods

Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical data for BM patients undergoing surgery at a single institution (2017–2021). Regression analyses were performed accordingly and maximally selected rank statistics were employed to identify an optimal cutoff for ASCVD risk scores. The random survival forest (RSF) machine learning technique identified the most important variable associated with survival outcomes in BM patients.

Results

A total of 139 patients were included with average age 62.93±9.29 years, 48.2 % male, 25.2 % with high hospital charges, and 23.7 % experiencing non-routine discharge. Among these patients, 32.3 % had prior history of an ASCVD event, while 67.7 % did not. Overall, this cohort had an average 10-year ASCVD risk score of 12.51±12.98, indicating intermediate risk of ASCVD among all BM patients. On multivariate logistic regression, prior history of ASCVD was associated with higher odds of high hospital charges (OR=3.670, p=0.018), and higher ASCVD risk scores were associated with greater odds of non-routine discharge (OR=1.059, p=0.012). On the multivariate Cox regression model, higher ASCVD risk scores correlated with worse overall survival (HR=1.031, p=0.014). A threshold of 25.1 was identified for high-risk ASCVD scores. Patients with ASCVD scores >25.1 exhibited reduced overall survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.015) and multivariate Cox regression (HR: 2.811, p=0.016). Notably, ASCVD risk scores were found to be the most important variable in predicting worse survival outcomes in BM patients compared to other established frailty indices.

Conclusion

This study indicates higher ASCVD risk scores in BM patients are associated with worse overall survival. Integrating ASCVD assessment into clinical workflow may facilitate more informed risk-based decision-making.

评估脑转移患者的动脉粥样硬化心血管疾病风险评分:与总生存期和高价值护理结果的关系
目的脑转移瘤(BM)是成年人最常见的颅内肿瘤。先前的文献表明,10 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评分与癌症风险增加有关,这可能归因于共同的风险因素。了解 ASCVD 风险评分在 BM 中的作用有助于优化其护理并为临床决策提供依据。我们的目的是探讨BM患者的ASCVD风险评分与其总生存率、住院费用和非正常出院处置之间的关联。方法我们查阅了电子病历,收集了在一家机构接受手术的BM患者的临床数据(2017-2021年)。据此进行回归分析,并采用最大选择秩统计来确定 ASCVD 风险评分的最佳临界值。随机生存森林(RSF)机器学习技术确定了与BM患者生存结果相关的最重要变量。结果共纳入139例患者,平均年龄(62.93±9.29)岁,48.2%为男性,25.2%住院费用高,23.7%为非正常出院。在这些患者中,32.3%的人曾有过 ASCVD 事件病史,67.7%的人没有。总体而言,该队列的 10 年平均 ASCVD 风险评分为 12.51±12.98,表明所有 BM 患者的 ASCVD 风险处于中等水平。在多变量逻辑回归中,既往 ASCVD 病史与高住院费用几率相关(OR=3.670,P=0.018),而较高的 ASCVD 风险评分与较高的非正常出院几率相关(OR=1.059,P=0.012)。在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,ASCVD 风险评分越高,总生存率越低(HR=1.031,p=0.014)。高风险ASCVD评分的阈值为25.1。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析(p=0.015)和多变量 Cox 回归(HR:2.811,p=0.016)中,ASCVD 评分为 25.1 的患者总生存期缩短。值得注意的是,与其他已建立的虚弱指数相比,ASCVD 风险评分是预测 BM 患者更差生存结果的最重要变量。将 ASCVD 评估纳入临床工作流程可能有助于做出更明智的基于风险的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信