Afterlives of discovery: tomb robberies, treasure and untangling Tutankhamun

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.121
Campbell Price
{"title":"Afterlives of discovery: tomb robberies, treasure and untangling Tutankhamun","authors":"Campbell Price","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Egyptology has been changing. At least in the way its practitioners present their findings to a broad public audience. A selection of recent publications for general-interest readership represents something of a reorientation of perspectives on the (Western-led) archaeological ‘discovery’ of Pharaonic Egyptian remains, and the opening up of a subtle counter-narrative, which is something of an anti-archaeology. Rather than attempting to reconstruct what might positively be said of ancient events, their causes and motivations, Egyptologists are increasingly owning up to what is not known or what happened in the aftermath of the ‘main event’ that conditions the nature of the evidence we have at our disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Egyptology has been changing. At least in the way its practitioners present their findings to a broad public audience. A selection of recent publications for general-interest readership represents something of a reorientation of perspectives on the (Western-led) archaeological ‘discovery’ of Pharaonic Egyptian remains, and the opening up of a subtle counter-narrative, which is something of an anti-archaeology. Rather than attempting to reconstruct what might positively be said of ancient events, their causes and motivations, Egyptologists are increasingly owning up to what is not known or what happened in the aftermath of the ‘main event’ that conditions the nature of the evidence we have at our disposal.

发现后的生活:盗墓、宝藏和解开图坦卡蒙的谜团
埃及学一直在变化。至少在其从业人员向广大公众介绍其发现的方式上是如此。最近出版的一些面向普通读者的出版物表明,人们对(西方主导的)考古学 "发现 "法老时期埃及遗存的观点发生了某种程度的调整,同时也开启了一种微妙的反叙述,即某种程度的反考古学。埃及考古学家不再试图重建对古代事件、其原因和动机的正面描述,而是越来越多地承认什么是不为人知的,或者在 "主要事件 "之后发生了什么,这些都决定了我们所掌握的证据的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antiquity
Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
149
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信