The case for inclusive co-creation in digital health innovation

IF 12.4 1区医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01256-9

Grace C. Nickel, Serena Wang, Jethro C. C. Kwong, Joseph C. Kvedar

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This piece critiques the exclusion of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) from the digital health innovation process. Drawing on “Sync fast and solve things—best practices for responsible digital health” by Landers et al., the editorial argues for the importance of inclusive co-creation, in which clinicians play an active role in developing digital health solutions. It emphasizes that without the meaningful involvement of HCPs, digital health tools risk being clinically irrelevant.

查看原文本刊更多论文

数字医疗创新中的包容性共创案例

这篇社论批评了将医疗从业人员（HCP）排除在数字医疗创新过程之外的做法。社论借鉴了 Landers 等人撰写的《快速同步，解决问题--负责任的数字医疗的最佳实践》一文，论证了包容性共同创造的重要性，即临床医生在开发数字医疗解决方案的过程中发挥积极作用。社论强调，如果没有医疗保健人员有意义的参与，数字医疗工具就有可能与临床无关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

NPJ Digital Medicine Multiple-

CiteScore

25.10

自引率

3.30%

发文量

170

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.