Peanut cultivar response to residual soil test potassium in North Mississippi

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Brendan Zurweller, Yangyang Song, Andrew Dygert, Jac Varco, Bryan Whittenton, Justin May, Brad Burgess
{"title":"Peanut cultivar response to residual soil test potassium in North Mississippi","authors":"Brendan Zurweller,&nbsp;Yangyang Song,&nbsp;Andrew Dygert,&nbsp;Jac Varco,&nbsp;Bryan Whittenton,&nbsp;Justin May,&nbsp;Brad Burgess","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The average U.S. peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac<sup>−1</sup> for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The average U.S. peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g−1) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g−1) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac−1 for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.

北密西西比州花生栽培品种对土壤测试残留钾的反应
随着花生栽培品种 "Georgia-06G "的采用,美国花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)的平均产量提高了约 25%。自采用该品种以来,许多具有类似产量潜力的新高产匍匐茎栽培品种相继问世。然而,目前的养分建议是基于 Georgia-06G 推出之前的土壤测试结果。尤其是钾,目前的土壤测试钾(STK)临界值是在阳离子交换容量(CEC)相对较低的土壤质地上确定的,但没有在阳离子交换容量较高的土壤质地上进行验证。本研究旨在根据密西西比州立大学推广部的土壤测试建议,评估五个新近发布的花生栽培品种对从极低到中等四个 STK 水平的生长和产量反应。STK 分级还基于两个被归类为高 CEC 的土壤系列--Leeper(∼38.4 meq 100 g-1)和 Marietta(∼15.9 meq 100 g-1)土壤系列。本研究评估了 "Georgia-06G"、"Georgia-16HO"、"Georgia-18RU"、FloRun "331 "和 "AU-NPL-17 "等品种。STK × 品种之间没有相互作用,这表明所有评估品种对钾的需求量相似。然而,当所有栽培品种和地点年份的平均 STK 从 128 磅/英亩-1 增加到 167 磅/英亩-1 时,两种土壤类型的豆荚产量都出现了正反应。两种土壤的 STK 临界值都高于许多现行的推广建议,Leeper 土壤的 STK 临界值高于 Marietta 土壤系列,这可能是由于 CEC 值较高。这些结果表明,有必要根据土壤的 CEC 值调整花生 STK 的充足水平。对于具有中等 CEC 的土壤,需要进一步评估现代花生栽培品种的生产力对 STK 充足水平的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信