Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2): results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Claire N Harrison,Ruben Mesa,Moshe Talpaz,Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali,Blanca Xicoy,Francesco Passamonti,Francesca Palandri,Giulia Benevolo,Alessandro Maria Vannucchi,Clemence Mediavilla,Alessandra Iurlo,InHo Kim,Shelonitda Rose,Patrick Brown,Christopher Hernandez,Jia Wang,Jean-Jacques Kiladjian
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2): results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Claire N Harrison,Ruben Mesa,Moshe Talpaz,Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali,Blanca Xicoy,Francesco Passamonti,Francesca Palandri,Giulia Benevolo,Alessandro Maria Vannucchi,Clemence Mediavilla,Alessandra Iurlo,InHo Kim,Shelonitda Rose,Patrick Brown,Christopher Hernandez,Jia Wang,Jean-Jacques Kiladjian","doi":"10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00212-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMost patients with myelofibrosis develop ruxolitinib intolerance or disease that is relapsed or refractory, and survival rates after ruxolitinib discontinuation are poor. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fedratinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFREEDOM2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial in 86 clinics in 16 countries, in which patients aged at least 18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis that was relapsed or refractory or intolerant to ruxolitinib with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 were stratified by spleen size by palpation, platelet count, and previous ruxolitinib treatment, and randomly assigned 2:1 by interactive response technology to receive fedratinib 400 mg per day (4 × 100 mg capsules orally once daily, open-label) or BAT. Patients received prophylactic antiemetics and thiamine supplementation, and symptomatic antidiarrhoeals as required. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients reaching spleen volume reduction (SVR) of at least 35% (SVR35) at end of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. This manuscript reports the primary analysis of the trial; follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03952039.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nBetween Sept 9, 2019 and June 24, 2022, of 316 patients screened, 201 were randomly assigned and treated (134 to fedratinib, 67 to BAT [including 52 receiving ruxolitinib]); 46 patients from the BAT group crossed over to fedratinib. Approximately half of enrolled patients were male (fedratinib 75 [56%] of 134; BAT 30 [45%] of 67) and most were White (fedratinib 106 [79%] of 134; BAT 58 [87%] of 67). At data cutoff (Dec 27, 2022), median survival follow-up was 64·5 weeks (IQR 37·9-104·9). SVR35 at end of cycle 6 was seen in 48 (36%) of 134 patients receiving fedratinib versus four (6%) of 67 patients receiving BAT (30% difference; 95% CI 20-39; one-sided p-value <0·0001). During the first six cycles 53 (40%) of 134 patients in the fedratinib group and 8 (12%) of 67 patients in the BAT group had grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events, most frequently anaemia (fedratinib 12 [9%] of 134; BAT 6 [9%] of 67) and thrombocytopenia (fedratinib 16 [12%] of 134; BAT 2 [3%] of 67); one patient in the fedratinib group died from acute kidney injury suspected to be related to study drug (no treatment-related deaths in the BAT group). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred more frequently in the fedratinib group compared with the BAT group, but were mostly grade 1-2 in severity and more frequent in early cycles, and were less frequent than in prior clinical trials. A total of 28 (21%) of 134 patients in the fedratinib group and 3 (4%) of 67 patients in the BAT group had thiamine levels below lower limit of normal per central laboratory assessment, with only one case of low thiamine in the fedratinib arm after the introduction of prophylactic thiamine supplementation.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nFindings from FREEDOM2 support fedratinib as a second-line Janus kinase inhibitor option to reduce spleen size after ruxolitinib failure or intolerance in patients with myelofibrosis, and shows effective strategies for management of gastrointestinal adverse events and low thiamine concentrations through prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nBristol Myers Squibb.","PeriodicalId":501011,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Haematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00212-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Most patients with myelofibrosis develop ruxolitinib intolerance or disease that is relapsed or refractory, and survival rates after ruxolitinib discontinuation are poor. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fedratinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib. METHODS FREEDOM2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial in 86 clinics in 16 countries, in which patients aged at least 18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis that was relapsed or refractory or intolerant to ruxolitinib with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 were stratified by spleen size by palpation, platelet count, and previous ruxolitinib treatment, and randomly assigned 2:1 by interactive response technology to receive fedratinib 400 mg per day (4 × 100 mg capsules orally once daily, open-label) or BAT. Patients received prophylactic antiemetics and thiamine supplementation, and symptomatic antidiarrhoeals as required. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients reaching spleen volume reduction (SVR) of at least 35% (SVR35) at end of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. This manuscript reports the primary analysis of the trial; follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03952039. FINDINGS Between Sept 9, 2019 and June 24, 2022, of 316 patients screened, 201 were randomly assigned and treated (134 to fedratinib, 67 to BAT [including 52 receiving ruxolitinib]); 46 patients from the BAT group crossed over to fedratinib. Approximately half of enrolled patients were male (fedratinib 75 [56%] of 134; BAT 30 [45%] of 67) and most were White (fedratinib 106 [79%] of 134; BAT 58 [87%] of 67). At data cutoff (Dec 27, 2022), median survival follow-up was 64·5 weeks (IQR 37·9-104·9). SVR35 at end of cycle 6 was seen in 48 (36%) of 134 patients receiving fedratinib versus four (6%) of 67 patients receiving BAT (30% difference; 95% CI 20-39; one-sided p-value <0·0001). During the first six cycles 53 (40%) of 134 patients in the fedratinib group and 8 (12%) of 67 patients in the BAT group had grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events, most frequently anaemia (fedratinib 12 [9%] of 134; BAT 6 [9%] of 67) and thrombocytopenia (fedratinib 16 [12%] of 134; BAT 2 [3%] of 67); one patient in the fedratinib group died from acute kidney injury suspected to be related to study drug (no treatment-related deaths in the BAT group). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred more frequently in the fedratinib group compared with the BAT group, but were mostly grade 1-2 in severity and more frequent in early cycles, and were less frequent than in prior clinical trials. A total of 28 (21%) of 134 patients in the fedratinib group and 3 (4%) of 67 patients in the BAT group had thiamine levels below lower limit of normal per central laboratory assessment, with only one case of low thiamine in the fedratinib arm after the introduction of prophylactic thiamine supplementation. INTERPRETATION Findings from FREEDOM2 support fedratinib as a second-line Janus kinase inhibitor option to reduce spleen size after ruxolitinib failure or intolerance in patients with myelofibrosis, and shows effective strategies for management of gastrointestinal adverse events and low thiamine concentrations through prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment. FUNDING Bristol Myers Squibb.
既往接受过鲁索利替尼治疗的骨髓纤维化患者服用非瑞替尼的疗效和安全性(FREEDOM2):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照、三期试验的结果。
背景大多数骨髓纤维化患者会出现鲁索利替尼不耐受或疾病复发或难治的情况,而停用鲁索利替尼后的生存率很低。我们旨在评估曾接受过鲁索利替尼治疗的骨髓纤维化患者使用非瑞替尼与最佳可用疗法(BAT)的安全性和有效性。方法FREEDOM2是一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照的3期试验,在16个国家的86家诊所进行。在这项试验中,年龄至少18岁的中-2级或高风险骨髓纤维化患者复发或对Ruxolitinib治疗难治或不耐受,且东方合作肿瘤学组表现状态为0-2级,根据触诊脾脏大小、血小板计数和既往Ruxolitinib治疗情况进行分层,并随机分配2:通过交互反应技术,以 2:1 的比例随机分配患者接受非瑞替尼 400 毫克/天(4 × 100 毫克胶囊,口服,每天一次,开放标签)或 BAT 治疗。患者接受预防性止吐药和硫胺素补充剂,并根据需要接受对症止泻药。主要终点是在意向治疗人群中,第6周期结束时脾脏体积缩小(SVR)达到至少35%(SVR35)的患者比例。本手稿报告了试验的主要分析结果;后续工作仍在进行中。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03952039。研究结果在 2019 年 9 月 9 日至 2022 年 6 月 24 日期间,在筛选出的 316 名患者中,201 名患者被随机分配并接受治疗(134 名患者接受了 fedratinib 治疗,67 名患者接受了 BAT 治疗[包括 52 名接受 ruxolitinib 治疗的患者]);46 名来自 BAT 组的患者交叉接受了 fedratinib 治疗。约半数入组患者为男性(134 名患者中有 75 名[56%]接受了 fedratinib 治疗;67 名患者中有 30 名[45%]接受了 BAT 治疗),大多数患者为白人(134 名患者中有 106 名[79%]接受了 fedratinib 治疗;67 名患者中有 58 名[87%]接受了 BAT 治疗)。数据截止日期(2022 年 12 月 27 日)为 64-5 周(IQR 37-9-104-9)。在接受费瑞替尼治疗的134例患者中,有48例(36%)在第6周期结束时达到SVR35,而在接受BAT治疗的67例患者中,有4例(6%)达到SVR35(差异为30%;95% CI为20-39;单侧P值<0-0001)。在前六个周期中,费拉替尼组 134 例患者中有 53 例(40%)发生了 3 级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件,BAT 组 67 例患者中有 8 例(12%)发生了 3 级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件,其中最常见的是贫血(费拉替尼组 134 例患者中有 12 例[9%],BAT 组 67 例患者中有 6 例[9%]);BAT 组 67 例中有 6 例[9%])和血小板减少症(非瑞替尼组 134 例中有 16 例[12%];BAT 组 67 例中有 2 例[3%]);非瑞替尼组有 1 例患者死于急性肾损伤,怀疑与研究药物有关(BAT 组无治疗相关死亡病例)。与BAT组相比,非瑞替尼组的胃肠道不良反应发生率更高,但严重程度大多为1-2级,且更多发生在早期周期,发生率低于之前的临床试验。根据中心实验室的评估,在134例fedratinib组患者中,有28例(21%)患者的硫胺素水平低于正常下限;在67例BAT组患者中,有3例(4%)患者的硫胺素水平低于正常下限。阐释FREEDOM2的研究结果支持将非瑞替尼作为二线Janus激酶抑制剂,用于减少骨髓纤维化患者鲁索利替尼失败或不耐受后的脾脏大小,并显示了通过预防、监测和治疗管理胃肠道不良事件和低硫胺素浓度的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信