Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1002/aet2.11024

Benjamin Schnapp MD, MEd, Morgan Sehdev MD, Caitlin Schrepel MD, Sharon Bord MD, Alexis Pelletier-Bui MD, Alai Alvarez MD, Nicole M. Dubosh MD, Yoon Soo Park PhD, Eric Shappell MD, MHPE

{"title":"Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation","authors":"Benjamin Schnapp MD, MEd, Morgan Sehdev MD, Caitlin Schrepel MD, Sharon Bord MD, Alexis Pelletier-Bui MD, Alai Alvarez MD, Nicole M. Dubosh MD, Yoon Soo Park PhD, Eric Shappell MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.11024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.

Objective

The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.

Methods

Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.

Results

Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.

Conclusions

Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于新的以能力为基础的急诊医学标准化评估书竞争力的教师共识

背景急诊医学（EM）引入了一种新的、基于能力的标准化评估书（SLOE）模板。虽然先前版本的 SLOE 已被证明能促进教师在竞争力方面达成高度共识，但新的 SLOE 模板尚未证明这一点。目标评估教师对新的电磁学 SLOE 2.0 竞争力的共识。方法使用新模板起草 50 封模拟 SLOE 2.0 信件，并将其发送给一组经验丰富的电磁教育工作者。经验丰富的教师对这 50 封信函进行了排序，同时还使用了基于点的预测模型和回归模型，并对结果进行了比较。结果在使用新的 SLOE 2.0 格式时，教师对竞争力的共识仍然很强。基于点数的预测模型和回归模型都显示出与 SLOE 2.0 的教师共识排名高度一致。结论采用新的、基于能力的 SLOE 2.0 格式并没有对教师对竞争力的一致排名产生有害影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

22.20%

发文量