Factors correlating with positive electrodiagnostic findings for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
{"title":"Factors correlating with positive electrodiagnostic findings for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) remains a challenge. The role of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the workup of nTOS remains controversial. The aim of this study was to report the EDX findings in a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for nTOS and also analyze patient-related and intraoperative factors associated with positive EDX findings supportive of nTOS diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Baseline characteristics of patients, including age, sex, duration of symptoms, type of nTOS, and pattern of brachial plexus involvement, were gathered and analyzed. All patients received a preoperative EDX evaluation and were divided into two groups based on positive or negative EDX results for comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 30 consecutive patients were included in this study comprising 11 (36.7%) men and 19 (63.3%) women, with a mean age of 44.6 ± 17.6 years. Twenty-two (73.3%) patients had type 1 nTOS with muscle weakness and atrophy, followed by 7 (23.4%) patients with type 3, and 1 (3.3%) patient with type 2 nTOS. In terms of nTOS pattern, 26 (86.7%) patients had lower plexus pattern of involvement (C8-T1), followed by 17 (56.7%) with upper-middle plexus pattern (C6-C7), and 13 (43.3%) with upper plexus pattern (C5-dorsal scapular nerve (DSN)). When comparing the characteristics of patients with positive and negative EDX findings suggestive of nTOS, only older age and type 1 nTOS (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) were significantly associated with positive EDX findings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Currently, EDX assessment may not be the best modality for diagnosis of nTOS. Interindividual variation in findings reported by different clinicians performing the EDX remains a significant limiting factor. Older patients and those with more severe nTOS (type 1) are more likely to have positive results with EDX.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) remains a challenge. The role of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the workup of nTOS remains controversial. The aim of this study was to report the EDX findings in a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for nTOS and also analyze patient-related and intraoperative factors associated with positive EDX findings supportive of nTOS diagnosis.

Methods

Baseline characteristics of patients, including age, sex, duration of symptoms, type of nTOS, and pattern of brachial plexus involvement, were gathered and analyzed. All patients received a preoperative EDX evaluation and were divided into two groups based on positive or negative EDX results for comparison.

Results

A total of 30 consecutive patients were included in this study comprising 11 (36.7%) men and 19 (63.3%) women, with a mean age of 44.6 ± 17.6 years. Twenty-two (73.3%) patients had type 1 nTOS with muscle weakness and atrophy, followed by 7 (23.4%) patients with type 3, and 1 (3.3%) patient with type 2 nTOS. In terms of nTOS pattern, 26 (86.7%) patients had lower plexus pattern of involvement (C8-T1), followed by 17 (56.7%) with upper-middle plexus pattern (C6-C7), and 13 (43.3%) with upper plexus pattern (C5-dorsal scapular nerve (DSN)). When comparing the characteristics of patients with positive and negative EDX findings suggestive of nTOS, only older age and type 1 nTOS (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with positive EDX findings.

Conclusions

Currently, EDX assessment may not be the best modality for diagnosis of nTOS. Interindividual variation in findings reported by different clinicians performing the EDX remains a significant limiting factor. Older patients and those with more severe nTOS (type 1) are more likely to have positive results with EDX.

与神经源性胸廓出口综合征阳性电诊断结果相关的因素
简介:神经源性胸廓出口综合征(nTOS)的诊断仍然是一项挑战。电诊断检查(EDX)在 nTOS 检查中的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是报告一组因 nTOS 而接受手术的患者的 EDX 结果,并分析与支持 nTOS 诊断的 EDX 阳性结果相关的患者相关因素和术中因素。方法收集并分析患者的基线特征,包括年龄、性别、症状持续时间、nTOS 类型和臂丛神经受累模式。结果本研究共纳入 30 例连续患者,其中男性 11 例(36.7%),女性 19 例(63.3%),平均年龄(44.6 ± 17.6)岁。22例(73.3%)患者为伴有肌无力和肌萎缩的1型nTOS,7例(23.4%)患者为3型,1例(3.3%)患者为2型nTOS。就 nTOS 模式而言,26 例(86.7%)患者的下神经丛模式(C8-T1)受累,17 例(56.7%)患者的中上神经丛模式(C6-C7)受累,13 例(43.3%)患者的上神经丛模式(C5-肩胛背神经(DSN))受累。在比较 EDX 阳性和阴性结果提示 nTOS 患者的特征时,只有年龄较大和 1 型 nTOS(P < 0.05)与 EDX 阳性结果显著相关。目前,EDX 评估可能还不是诊断 nTOS 的最佳方式。不同临床医生在进行 EDX 评估时所报告的结果存在个体差异,这仍然是一个重要的限制因素。年龄较大和病情较重的 nTOS(1 型)患者更有可能在 EDX 中得到阳性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信