Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus by Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer (review)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Glenn B. Siniscalchi
{"title":"Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus by Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer (review)","authors":"Glenn B. Siniscalchi","doi":"10.1353/ecu.2024.a935556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus</em> by Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Glenn B. Siniscalchi </li> </ul> Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer, <em>Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus</em>. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2023. Pp. 278. $32.00, paper. <p>A significant component of interreligious dialogue has to do with clarifying the meanings of the distinctive claims pronounced by the world's religions. Discussions surrounding the uniqueness of Christianity are frequently centered on explaining the identity of Jesus of Nazareth. This book is a welcome addition to the recent resurgence of biblical scholarship that illustrates how the Second Testament writings are unanimous in upholding Jesus' ontological uniqueness for human salvation. Drawing upon Jewish and Greco-Roman concepts for understanding the background traditions and practices that helped to fashion the earliest portrayals of Jesus, Porter and Dyer maintain that the widespread use of designated titles indicates that the highest Christology pervades the relevant Second Testament texts.</p> <p>Each chapter concentrates on a select title of Jesus (the Lord, Prophet, Son of Man, Son of God, Suffering Servant, Passover Lamb, Messiah, Savior, Last Adam, Word, and High Priest). Porter and Dyer do an excellent job of showing how the traditions behind and alongside the christological titles were instrumental in the final presentations of Jesus in the biblical texts: \"the New Testament writers draw from familiar traditions and categories to help them articulate their understanding of Jesus. … [He] is presented as the Suffering Servant from Isaiah, the elusive Son of Man figure described in Daniel 7, the king-priest Melchizedek, the lamb slaughtered at Passover, and so forth\" (p. xviii). Each <strong>[End Page 441]</strong> title contributes to forming a kaleidoscopic vision of the earliest church's understandings of Jesus. The book is mostly concerned with discussing and formulating a Second Testament Christology, rather than with ecclesiastical or spiritual readings of biblical texts.</p> <p>Since the middle of the nineteenth century, major contributions to the study of christological origins have reflected one of two basic orientations. In one view, belief in the divinity of Jesus began with the groups and individuals who knew him during his lifetime. Jesus himself taught that he was divine. In another perspective, Jesus was a highly ethical and representative human being. Belief in the divine nature was fabricated as time went on among the earliest Christian communities, and the Second Testament writings epitomize the outcome of that evolutionary development. The authors conclude that the former should have precedent over the latter: \"The depiction of Jesus as divine was not a later event but a reflection of how Jesus was seen by his first and earliest followers. … the question of <em>when</em> Jesus became God must … be answered in this way: it did not just happen early … but was a fact built into the very fabric of the New Testament from its earliest traditions. Some of these titles go back to Jesus himself\" (p. 235).</p> <p>Although the christological titles approach has mostly fallen out of vogue in recent decades, Porter and Dyer have provided the guild with an indispensable piece of scholarship that should be consulted by graduate students, biblical scholars, and competent participants who are involved with the dialogue between Christianity and other religions. This book can be utilized to clarify the original meanings that were assigned to Jesus' identity. In this way, it will be of tremendous service to answering a fundamental question that originated during the ministry of Jesus and continues to be asked around the globe: \"Who is this man?\"</p> Glenn B. Siniscalchi Rosemont College, Rosemont, PA Copyright © 2024 <em>Journal of Ecumenical Studies</em> ... </p>","PeriodicalId":43047,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2024.a935556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus by Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer
  • Glenn B. Siniscalchi
Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer, Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2023. Pp. 278. $32.00, paper.

A significant component of interreligious dialogue has to do with clarifying the meanings of the distinctive claims pronounced by the world's religions. Discussions surrounding the uniqueness of Christianity are frequently centered on explaining the identity of Jesus of Nazareth. This book is a welcome addition to the recent resurgence of biblical scholarship that illustrates how the Second Testament writings are unanimous in upholding Jesus' ontological uniqueness for human salvation. Drawing upon Jewish and Greco-Roman concepts for understanding the background traditions and practices that helped to fashion the earliest portrayals of Jesus, Porter and Dyer maintain that the widespread use of designated titles indicates that the highest Christology pervades the relevant Second Testament texts.

Each chapter concentrates on a select title of Jesus (the Lord, Prophet, Son of Man, Son of God, Suffering Servant, Passover Lamb, Messiah, Savior, Last Adam, Word, and High Priest). Porter and Dyer do an excellent job of showing how the traditions behind and alongside the christological titles were instrumental in the final presentations of Jesus in the biblical texts: "the New Testament writers draw from familiar traditions and categories to help them articulate their understanding of Jesus. … [He] is presented as the Suffering Servant from Isaiah, the elusive Son of Man figure described in Daniel 7, the king-priest Melchizedek, the lamb slaughtered at Passover, and so forth" (p. xviii). Each [End Page 441] title contributes to forming a kaleidoscopic vision of the earliest church's understandings of Jesus. The book is mostly concerned with discussing and formulating a Second Testament Christology, rather than with ecclesiastical or spiritual readings of biblical texts.

Since the middle of the nineteenth century, major contributions to the study of christological origins have reflected one of two basic orientations. In one view, belief in the divinity of Jesus began with the groups and individuals who knew him during his lifetime. Jesus himself taught that he was divine. In another perspective, Jesus was a highly ethical and representative human being. Belief in the divine nature was fabricated as time went on among the earliest Christian communities, and the Second Testament writings epitomize the outcome of that evolutionary development. The authors conclude that the former should have precedent over the latter: "The depiction of Jesus as divine was not a later event but a reflection of how Jesus was seen by his first and earliest followers. … the question of when Jesus became God must … be answered in this way: it did not just happen early … but was a fact built into the very fabric of the New Testament from its earliest traditions. Some of these titles go back to Jesus himself" (p. 235).

Although the christological titles approach has mostly fallen out of vogue in recent decades, Porter and Dyer have provided the guild with an indispensable piece of scholarship that should be consulted by graduate students, biblical scholars, and competent participants who are involved with the dialogue between Christianity and other religions. This book can be utilized to clarify the original meanings that were assigned to Jesus' identity. In this way, it will be of tremendous service to answering a fundamental question that originated during the ministry of Jesus and continues to be asked around the globe: "Who is this man?"

Glenn B. Siniscalchi Rosemont College, Rosemont, PA Copyright © 2024 Journal of Ecumenical Studies ...

新约基督论的起源:斯坦利-波特(Stanley E. Porter)和布莱恩-戴尔(Bryan R. Dyer)著《新约基督论的起源:耶稣的传统和头衔简介》(评论
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 新约基督论的起源:斯坦利-E.-波特和布莱恩-R.-戴尔著,《新约基督论的起源:适用于耶稣的传统和头衔导论》(Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus by Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer Glenn B. Siniscalchi 斯坦利-E.-波特和布莱恩-R.-戴尔著):适用于耶稣的传统和头衔简介》。密歇根州大急流城:贝克学术出版社,2023 年。第 278 页。纸质版 32.00 美元。宗教间对话的一个重要组成部分是澄清世界各宗教所宣称的独特主张的含义。围绕基督教独特性的讨论经常集中在解释拿撒勒人耶稣的身份上。近来,《圣经》学术研究再度兴起,本书是对这一研究的有益补充,它说明了《第二约》的著作是如何一致坚持耶稣在本体论上对人类救赎的独特性的。波特和戴尔利用犹太人和希腊罗马人的概念来理解有助于塑造耶稣最早形象的背景传统和习俗,他们认为,指定称谓的广泛使用表明最高的基督论充斥着相关的《第二约》文本。每一章都集中讨论耶稣的一个特定称谓(主、先知、人子、神子、受难的仆人、逾越节的羔羊、弥赛亚、救世主、最后的亚当、圣言和大祭司)。波特和戴尔出色地展示了基督称谓背后和旁边的传统是如何在圣经文本中最终呈现耶稣的:"新约》作者从熟悉的传统和范畴中汲取营养,帮助他们阐述对耶稣的理解。......[他]被描述为以赛亚书中的受苦受难的仆人、但以理书第 7 章中描述的难以捉摸的人子形象、麦基洗德王祭司、逾越节上被宰杀的羔羊等等"(第 xviii 页)。每个 [第 441 页末] 标题都有助于形成最早教会对耶稣的理解的万花筒式视角。本书的主要内容是讨论和制定《第二约》基督论,而不是对《圣经》文本的教会或灵性解读。自十九世纪中叶以来,对基督起源研究的主要贡献反映了两种基本取向之一。一种观点认为,对耶稣神性的信仰始于在他生前认识他的群体和个人。耶稣本人也教导人们他是神圣的。另一种观点认为,耶稣是一个极具伦理道德和代表性的人。对神性的信仰是随着时间的推移在最早的基督教团体中逐渐形成的,而《第二约》的写作则是这一演变发展的结果的缩影。作者的结论是,前者应优先于后者:"将耶稣描绘成神不是后来发生的事情,而是反映了耶稣最早的追随者是如何看待耶稣的。......关于耶稣何时成为神的问题......必须这样回答:它并不是很早就发生的......而是从最早的传统开始就融入了《新约》的结构之中。其中一些称谓可以追溯到耶稣本人"(第 235 页)。尽管近几十年来,基督称谓学的方法大多已不再流行,但波特和戴尔还是为本协会提供了一本不可或缺的学术著作,研究生、圣经学者以及参与基督教与其他宗教对话的有能力的参与者都应该参阅这本书。本书可用于澄清耶稣身份的原始含义。通过这种方式,本书将为回答一个在耶稣传道期间提出的基本问题提供极大的帮助,这个问题在全球范围内仍在不断被提出:"这个人是谁?Glenn B. Siniscalchi Rosemont College, Rosemont, PA Copyright © 2024 Journal of Ecumenical Studies ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信