Optimal runner design for balanced filling in a multi‐cavity mold using a two‐stage analytical approach

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Bo‐Yu Yang, Chung‐Chih Lin
{"title":"Optimal runner design for balanced filling in a multi‐cavity mold using a two‐stage analytical approach","authors":"Bo‐Yu Yang, Chung‐Chih Lin","doi":"10.1002/pen.26945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>In a multi‐cavity mold, parts from each cavity have consistent properties if the runner system ensures balanced melt‐front advancement. An unbalanced mold, however, narrows the processing window, complicating quality control and making it harder to maintain standards. Molds with an inherently balanced filling, such as the H‐type runner system, are preferred. However, as the number of cavities increases, improvements are needed to address the issues caused by shear heating. Additionally, the material waste in the H‐type runner system is significantly greater than in the fishbone runner system. Based on the rheological concept, a two‐stage analytical approach is established to optimize the fishbone runner system. The diameter of each runner in the fishbone runner system is optimized by controlling pressure drop and remaining time to achieve balanced filling. The impact of these factors is thoroughly examined, as well as why they must be controlled during optimization. The proposed work links the physical situation to its mathematical model, proving highly beneficial for new runner system designs, especially without commercial software assistance.Highlights<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>A new approach to solving unbalanced filling in multi‐cavity molds.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Pressure drop and remaining time are key factors for optimization.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Two‐stage analytical approach ensures optimization accuracy.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The optimal runner system reduces injection pressure for molding.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>An alternative method for designing fishbone runners without CAE assistance.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":20281,"journal":{"name":"Polymer Engineering and Science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymer Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a multi‐cavity mold, parts from each cavity have consistent properties if the runner system ensures balanced melt‐front advancement. An unbalanced mold, however, narrows the processing window, complicating quality control and making it harder to maintain standards. Molds with an inherently balanced filling, such as the H‐type runner system, are preferred. However, as the number of cavities increases, improvements are needed to address the issues caused by shear heating. Additionally, the material waste in the H‐type runner system is significantly greater than in the fishbone runner system. Based on the rheological concept, a two‐stage analytical approach is established to optimize the fishbone runner system. The diameter of each runner in the fishbone runner system is optimized by controlling pressure drop and remaining time to achieve balanced filling. The impact of these factors is thoroughly examined, as well as why they must be controlled during optimization. The proposed work links the physical situation to its mathematical model, proving highly beneficial for new runner system designs, especially without commercial software assistance.Highlights A new approach to solving unbalanced filling in multi‐cavity molds. Pressure drop and remaining time are key factors for optimization. Two‐stage analytical approach ensures optimization accuracy. The optimal runner system reduces injection pressure for molding. An alternative method for designing fishbone runners without CAE assistance.
采用两阶段分析方法优化流道设计,实现多腔模具的均衡填充
在多型腔模具中,如果流道系统能确保熔体前沿平衡推进,则每个型腔的零件都具有一致的特性。然而,不平衡的模具会缩小加工窗口,使质量控制复杂化,更难保持标准。H 型流道系统等具有固有平衡填充的模具是首选。然而,随着模腔数量的增加,需要改进以解决剪切加热引起的问题。此外,H 型流道系统中的材料浪费明显大于鱼骨型流道系统。基于流变学概念,建立了一种两阶段分析方法来优化鱼骨流道系统。通过控制压降和剩余时间来优化鱼骨式流道系统中每个流道的直径,以实现平衡填充。对这些因素的影响以及优化过程中必须控制这些因素的原因进行了深入研究。所提出的工作将物理情况与其数学模型联系起来,证明对新的流道系统设计非常有益,尤其是在没有商业软件辅助的情况下。压降和剩余时间是优化的关键因素。两阶段分析方法确保优化的准确性。最佳流道系统可降低注塑压力。无需 CAE 辅助即可设计鱼骨流道的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymer Engineering and Science
Polymer Engineering and Science 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
329
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: For more than 30 years, Polymer Engineering & Science has been one of the most highly regarded journals in the field, serving as a forum for authors of treatises on the cutting edge of polymer science and technology. The importance of PE&S is underscored by the frequent rate at which its articles are cited, especially by other publications - literally thousand of times a year. Engineers, researchers, technicians, and academicians worldwide are looking to PE&S for the valuable information they need. There are special issues compiled by distinguished guest editors. These contain proceedings of symposia on such diverse topics as polyblends, mechanics of plastics and polymer welding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信