Is It Possible to Achieve Sustainable Land Management on Land Affected by Erosion? Issues of Modeling Variants

O. V. Andreeva, G. S. Kust
{"title":"Is It Possible to Achieve Sustainable Land Management on Land Affected by Erosion? Issues of Modeling Variants","authors":"O. V. Andreeva, G. S. Kust","doi":"10.3103/s0147687424700157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Despite the large number of different antierosion practices used in the country, the dynamics of the areas of eroded lands remains multidirectional and unstable. The goal of the work was to propose a methodological approach for semantic modeling of sustainable land management with a focus on antierosion measures, the methods for such modeling and land management in the areas prone to soil erosion in order to maintain and restore degraded lands. A variety of erosion control techniques, methods, approaches, technologies and activities described in different sources, including databases on best practices, educational and scientific literature serves as objects of the study. The study was based on the integration of several working hypotheses and approaches proposed by the authors in earlier publications. The methodological basis of these approaches is the concept of land degradation neutrality (LDN) and the principles for assessing the “sustainability” of environmental management based on it. Using the example of several sites, methods for semantic modeling of the sustainability of antierosion land management are considered. These methods are based on assessing the achievement of LDN using so-called “good” practices. For the assessment, the following parameters of the model were applied: “natural potential” (reflecting resource potential, adaptive potential and the ability to self-recovery of land), “expanded potential” (reflecting human improvements in natural potential and the sufficiency of socioeconomic conditions); “actual adverse impacts,” including natural processes and phenomena and those caused by human impact; and “potential adverse impacts,” including natural and anthropogenic risks. Model parameters can be combined in the required combination and reflect different modeling tasks in order to determine the adequacy of erosion control practices, including general approaches and techniques for regional models, methods and technologies for subregional and local ones, and specific activities and measures for local models implemented for individual land plots and farms. The proposed method for visualizing models, based on the construction of radar diagrams, is a flexible solution that provides opportunity to consider the sufficiency of practices, combine them into groups, and also generalize sustainability parameters depending on the goals of modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":501690,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin","volume":"460 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147687424700157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the large number of different antierosion practices used in the country, the dynamics of the areas of eroded lands remains multidirectional and unstable. The goal of the work was to propose a methodological approach for semantic modeling of sustainable land management with a focus on antierosion measures, the methods for such modeling and land management in the areas prone to soil erosion in order to maintain and restore degraded lands. A variety of erosion control techniques, methods, approaches, technologies and activities described in different sources, including databases on best practices, educational and scientific literature serves as objects of the study. The study was based on the integration of several working hypotheses and approaches proposed by the authors in earlier publications. The methodological basis of these approaches is the concept of land degradation neutrality (LDN) and the principles for assessing the “sustainability” of environmental management based on it. Using the example of several sites, methods for semantic modeling of the sustainability of antierosion land management are considered. These methods are based on assessing the achievement of LDN using so-called “good” practices. For the assessment, the following parameters of the model were applied: “natural potential” (reflecting resource potential, adaptive potential and the ability to self-recovery of land), “expanded potential” (reflecting human improvements in natural potential and the sufficiency of socioeconomic conditions); “actual adverse impacts,” including natural processes and phenomena and those caused by human impact; and “potential adverse impacts,” including natural and anthropogenic risks. Model parameters can be combined in the required combination and reflect different modeling tasks in order to determine the adequacy of erosion control practices, including general approaches and techniques for regional models, methods and technologies for subregional and local ones, and specific activities and measures for local models implemented for individual land plots and farms. The proposed method for visualizing models, based on the construction of radar diagrams, is a flexible solution that provides opportunity to consider the sufficiency of practices, combine them into groups, and also generalize sustainability parameters depending on the goals of modeling.

Abstract Image

受侵蚀影响的土地有可能实现可持续土地管理吗?建模变量问题
摘要尽管该国采用了大量不同的防水土流失做法,但水土流失地区的动态变化仍然是多向和不稳定的。这项工作的目标是为可持续土地管理的语义建模提出一种方法论,重点是防侵蚀措施、这种建模的方法以及易受土壤侵蚀地区的土地管理,以维护和恢复退化的土地。研究对象是不同来源(包括最佳实践数据库、教育和科学文献)中描述的各种水土流失控制技术、方法、途径、技术和活动。这项研究基于对作者在早期出版物中提出的若干工作假设和方法的整合。这些方法的方法论基础是土地退化中性(LDN)的概念以及在此基础上评估环境管理 "可持续性 "的原则。本文以几个地点为例,探讨了建立防侵蚀土地管理可持续性语义模型的方法。这些方法的基础是利用所谓的 "良好 "做法评估 LDN 的实现情况。在评估中,采用了模型的以下参数:"自然潜能"(反映资源潜能、适应潜能和土地自我恢复能力)、"扩展潜能"(反映人类对自然潜能的改善和社会经济条件的充足性);"实际不利影响",包括自然过程和现象以及人为影响造成的不利影响;以及 "潜在不利影响",包括自然风险和人为风险。模型参数可按要求组合,并反映不同的建模任务,以确定侵蚀控制做法的适当性,包括区域模型的一般方法和技术、次区域和地方模型的方法和技术,以及针对个别地块和农场实施的地方模型的具体活动和措施。所建议的模型可视化方法以雷达图的构建为基础,是一种灵活的解决方案,可提供机会考虑各种做法的充分性,将其组合成组,还可根据建模目标概括可持续性参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信