Queue Configurations and Operational Performance: An Interplay Between Customer Ownership and Queue Length Awareness

Hummy Song, Mor Armony, Guillaume Roels
{"title":"Queue Configurations and Operational Performance: An Interplay Between Customer Ownership and Queue Length Awareness","authors":"Hummy Song, Mor Armony, Guillaume Roels","doi":"10.1287/msom.2023.0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Contrary to traditional queueing theory, recent field studies in B2C services indicate that pooled queues may be less efficient than dedicated queues. Methodology/results: We use two online experiments in the healthcare delivery context to replicate this finding and assess the interplay of servers’ customer ownership and queue length awareness as potential underlying mechanisms. We operationalize customer ownership as the extent to which servers feel ownership toward their customers and queue length awareness as the extent to which servers are able to accurately quantify their number of customers. We find that, following a change in queue configuration, dedicated queues outperform pooled queues with respect to processing speed without sacrificing quality. The reduction in speed is partially mediated by the servers’ queue length awareness and partially suppressed by their ownership of customers in queue. The former is because servers turn out to be less likely to underestimate their load, which makes them work faster. The latter is because ownership of customers in queue may distract servers from the customer in service. When the queue configuration changes from a dedicated to a pooled one, the shorter processing times and higher levels of queue length awareness persist across the change, unlike the higher ownership of customers in the queue. Managerial implications: In discretionary service settings, switching to a dedicated queue is often beneficial in terms of operational performance, partly because the increased queue length awareness motivates servers to work faster; however, the increased degree of customer ownership of those in queue may distract them and result in a slowdown.Funding: This work was supported by the Wharton Behavioral Lab, the Claude Marion Endowed Faculty Scholar Award, the Wharton-INSEAD Alliance, and the Wharton Dean’s Research Fund.Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0202 .","PeriodicalId":501267,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem definition: Contrary to traditional queueing theory, recent field studies in B2C services indicate that pooled queues may be less efficient than dedicated queues. Methodology/results: We use two online experiments in the healthcare delivery context to replicate this finding and assess the interplay of servers’ customer ownership and queue length awareness as potential underlying mechanisms. We operationalize customer ownership as the extent to which servers feel ownership toward their customers and queue length awareness as the extent to which servers are able to accurately quantify their number of customers. We find that, following a change in queue configuration, dedicated queues outperform pooled queues with respect to processing speed without sacrificing quality. The reduction in speed is partially mediated by the servers’ queue length awareness and partially suppressed by their ownership of customers in queue. The former is because servers turn out to be less likely to underestimate their load, which makes them work faster. The latter is because ownership of customers in queue may distract servers from the customer in service. When the queue configuration changes from a dedicated to a pooled one, the shorter processing times and higher levels of queue length awareness persist across the change, unlike the higher ownership of customers in the queue. Managerial implications: In discretionary service settings, switching to a dedicated queue is often beneficial in terms of operational performance, partly because the increased queue length awareness motivates servers to work faster; however, the increased degree of customer ownership of those in queue may distract them and result in a slowdown.Funding: This work was supported by the Wharton Behavioral Lab, the Claude Marion Endowed Faculty Scholar Award, the Wharton-INSEAD Alliance, and the Wharton Dean’s Research Fund.Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0202 .
队列配置与运营绩效:客户所有权与队列长度意识之间的相互作用
问题定义:与传统排队理论相反,最近对 B2C 服务的实地研究表明,集合队列的效率可能低于专用队列。方法/结果:我们在医疗保健服务中使用了两个在线实验来复制这一发现,并评估服务器的客户所有权和队列长度意识作为潜在潜在机制的相互作用。我们将客户所有权定义为服务器对其客户的所有权程度,将队列长度意识定义为服务器能够准确量化其客户数量的程度。我们发现,在队列配置发生变化后,专用队列在处理速度方面优于集合队列,而不会牺牲质量。速度降低的部分原因是服务器对队列长度的认识,部分原因是服务器对队列中客户的所有权。前者是因为服务器不太可能低估自己的负载,这使得他们的工作速度更快。后者是因为队列中客户的所有权可能会分散服务器对服务中客户的注意力。当队列配置从专用队列变为集合队列时,较短的处理时间和较高的队列长度意识会在整个变化过程中持续存在,这与队列中客户所有权较高的情况不同。管理意义:在自行决定的服务环境中,切换到专用队列通常有利于提高运营绩效,部分原因是队列长度意识的提高会促使服务器加快工作速度;但是,队列中客户所有权程度的提高可能会分散他们的注意力,从而导致速度减慢:本研究得到了沃顿行为实验室、克劳德-马里昂教师学者奖、沃顿商学院-欧洲工商管理学院联盟以及沃顿商学院院长研究基金的支持:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0202 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信