Local Effects of Continuous Instruments without Positivity

Prabrisha Rakshit, Alexander Levis, Luke Keele
{"title":"Local Effects of Continuous Instruments without Positivity","authors":"Prabrisha Rakshit, Alexander Levis, Luke Keele","doi":"arxiv-2409.07350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instrumental variables have become a popular study design for the estimation\nof treatment effects in the presence of unobserved confounders. In the\ncanonical instrumental variables design, the instrument is a binary variable,\nand most extant methods are tailored to this context. In many settings,\nhowever, the instrument is a continuous measure. Standard estimation methods\ncan be applied with continuous instruments, but they require strong assumptions\nregarding functional form. Moreover, while some recent work has introduced more\nflexible approaches for continuous instruments, these methods require an\nassumption known as positivity that is unlikely to hold in many applications.\nWe derive a novel family of causal estimands using a stochastic dynamic\nintervention framework that considers a range of intervention distributions\nthat are absolutely continuous with respect to the observed distribution of the\ninstrument. These estimands focus on a specific form of local effect but do not\nrequire a positivity assumption. Next, we develop doubly robust estimators for\nthese estimands that allow for estimation of the nuisance functions via\nnonparametric estimators. We use empirical process theory and sample splitting\nto derive asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators under weak\nconditions. In addition, we derive methods for profiling the principal strata\nas well as a method for sensitivity analysis for assessing robustness to an\nunderlying monotonicity assumption. We evaluate our methods via simulation and\ndemonstrate their feasibility using an application on the effectiveness of\nsurgery for specific emergency conditions.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instrumental variables have become a popular study design for the estimation of treatment effects in the presence of unobserved confounders. In the canonical instrumental variables design, the instrument is a binary variable, and most extant methods are tailored to this context. In many settings, however, the instrument is a continuous measure. Standard estimation methods can be applied with continuous instruments, but they require strong assumptions regarding functional form. Moreover, while some recent work has introduced more flexible approaches for continuous instruments, these methods require an assumption known as positivity that is unlikely to hold in many applications. We derive a novel family of causal estimands using a stochastic dynamic intervention framework that considers a range of intervention distributions that are absolutely continuous with respect to the observed distribution of the instrument. These estimands focus on a specific form of local effect but do not require a positivity assumption. Next, we develop doubly robust estimators for these estimands that allow for estimation of the nuisance functions via nonparametric estimators. We use empirical process theory and sample splitting to derive asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators under weak conditions. In addition, we derive methods for profiling the principal strata as well as a method for sensitivity analysis for assessing robustness to an underlying monotonicity assumption. We evaluate our methods via simulation and demonstrate their feasibility using an application on the effectiveness of surgery for specific emergency conditions.
无正向性连续仪器的局部效应
工具变量已成为一种流行的研究设计,用于估计存在未观察混杂因素时的治疗效果。在典型的工具变量设计中,工具是二元变量,大多数现存方法都是针对这种情况而设计的。然而,在许多情况下,工具是一个连续变量。标准的估计方法可以应用于连续工具,但需要对函数形式进行严格的假设。此外,虽然最近的一些研究针对连续工具引入了更灵活的方法,但这些方法需要一个被称为 "正向性 "的假设,而这个假设在很多应用中都不太可能成立。我们利用随机动态干预框架推导出了一系列新颖的因果估计方法,这些方法考虑了一系列相对于观察到的工具分布而言绝对连续的干预分布。这些估计值关注的是一种特定形式的局部效应,但不需要正向性假设。接下来,我们为这些估计项开发了双重稳健估计器,允许用非参数估计器来估计滋扰函数。我们利用经验过程理论和样本分割推导出所提估计器在弱条件下的渐近特性。此外,我们还推导出了剖析主层的方法以及敏感性分析方法,用于评估对基本单调性假设的稳健性。我们通过模拟对我们的方法进行了评估,并通过对特定紧急情况下手术效果的应用证明了这些方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信