Voltage Mining for (De)lithiation-stabilized Cathodes and a Machine Learning Model for Li-ion Cathode Voltage

Haoming Howard Li, Qian Chen, Gerbrand Ceder, Kristin A. Persson
{"title":"Voltage Mining for (De)lithiation-stabilized Cathodes and a Machine Learning Model for Li-ion Cathode Voltage","authors":"Haoming Howard Li, Qian Chen, Gerbrand Ceder, Kristin A. Persson","doi":"arxiv-2409.06921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in lithium-metal anodes have inspired interest in discovery of\nLi-free cathodes, most of which are natively found in their charged state. This\nis in contrast to today's commercial lithium-ion battery cathodes, which are\nmore stable in their discharged state. In this study, we combine calculated\ncathode voltage information from both categories of cathode materials, covering\n5577 and 2423 total unique structure pairs, respectively. The resulting voltage\ndistributions with respect to the redox pairs and anion types for both classes\nof compounds emphasize design principles for high-voltage cathodes, which favor\nlater Period 4 transition metals in their higher oxidation states and more\nelectronegative anions like fluorine or polyaion groups. Generally, cathodes\nthat are found in their charged, delithiated state are shown to exhibit\nvoltages lower than those that are most stable in their lithiated state, in\nagreement with thermodynamic expectations. Deviations from this trend are found\nto originate from different anion distributions between redox pairs. In\naddition, a machine learning model for voltage prediction based on chemical\nformulae is constructed, and shows state-of-the-art performance when compared\nto two established composition-based ML models for materials properties\npredictions, Roost and CrabNet.","PeriodicalId":501234,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in lithium-metal anodes have inspired interest in discovery of Li-free cathodes, most of which are natively found in their charged state. This is in contrast to today's commercial lithium-ion battery cathodes, which are more stable in their discharged state. In this study, we combine calculated cathode voltage information from both categories of cathode materials, covering 5577 and 2423 total unique structure pairs, respectively. The resulting voltage distributions with respect to the redox pairs and anion types for both classes of compounds emphasize design principles for high-voltage cathodes, which favor later Period 4 transition metals in their higher oxidation states and more electronegative anions like fluorine or polyaion groups. Generally, cathodes that are found in their charged, delithiated state are shown to exhibit voltages lower than those that are most stable in their lithiated state, in agreement with thermodynamic expectations. Deviations from this trend are found to originate from different anion distributions between redox pairs. In addition, a machine learning model for voltage prediction based on chemical formulae is constructed, and shows state-of-the-art performance when compared to two established composition-based ML models for materials properties predictions, Roost and CrabNet.
锂化稳定阴极的电压挖掘和锂离子阴极电压的机器学习模型
锂金属阳极技术的进步激发了人们对发现无锂阴极的兴趣。这与当今的商用锂离子电池正极形成了鲜明对比,后者在放电状态下更为稳定。在本研究中,我们综合了两类阴极材料的阴极电压计算信息,分别涵盖了 5577 个和 2423 个独特的结构对。由此得出的两类化合物的氧化还原对和阴离子类型的电压分布强调了高压阴极的设计原则,即偏向于氧化态较高的后期 4 期过渡金属和电负性较强的阴离子(如氟或聚阴离子基团)。一般来说,在带电的脱硫酸盐状态下的阴极显示的电压低于在石酸盐状态下最稳定的阴极,这与热力学的预期相符。发现这一趋势的偏差源于氧化还原对之间不同的阴离子分布。此外,我们还构建了一个基于化学式的机器学习电压预测模型,与两个已建立的基于成分的 ML 材料特性预测模型 Roost 和 CrabNet 相比,该模型显示出了最先进的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信