Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass: molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs.\ reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data
{"title":"Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass: molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs.\\ reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data","authors":"Kenta Matsutani, Shusuke Kasamatsu, Takeshi Usuki","doi":"arxiv-2409.06982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by\nmolecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab\ninitio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of\nneutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each\nmodel, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and\nshape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These\nresults show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body\ncorrelations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different\nshort and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed\nespecially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution\nin the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular\ndynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density\nfunctional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred\nnetwork assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints\nand neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.","PeriodicalId":501234,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by
molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab
initio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of
neutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each
model, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and
shape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These
results show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body
correlations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different
short and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed
especially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution
in the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular
dynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density
functional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred
network assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints
and neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.