Basilio Addo, Walter Agyeman, Sammudeen Ibrahim, Patrick Berchie
{"title":"Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Functional Capacity, Symptoms, and Safety Outcomes","authors":"Basilio Addo, Walter Agyeman, Sammudeen Ibrahim, Patrick Berchie","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.</p><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95–3.569), <i>p</i> < 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (− 1.44 to 8.63), <i>p</i> = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68–0.84), <i>p</i> < 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83–0.99), <i>p</i> = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98–1.03), <i>p</i> = 0.39).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 6","pages":"753 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00669-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.
Background
Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.
Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.
Results
In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95–3.569), p < 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (− 1.44 to 8.63), p = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68–0.84), p < 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83–0.99), p = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98–1.03), p = 0.39).
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.