Ahmed Nasser Mahgoub, Monika Korte, Sanja Panovska, Maximilian Schanner
{"title":"Robustness of characteristics of the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic field reversal found in global models","authors":"Ahmed Nasser Mahgoub, Monika Korte, Sanja Panovska, Maximilian Schanner","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1443095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paleomagnetic data enables the global reconstruction of the geomagnetic field, allowing the investigation of significant events like polarity reversals and excursions. When compared to prior polarity reversals, the most recent one, the Matuyama-Brunhes (MB), is the best recorded reversal in terms of number of available paleomagnetic data. Nevertheless, several of these data have poor age control, and they are not distributed equally worldwide. Few global models have been presented for the MB; the most recent is the GGFMB (Global Geomagnetic Field Model for the MB reversal). Limitations imposed by input data and subjective assumptions about the data that are made in modelling restrict the resolution and reliability of these models. This study presents a suite of eight additional global models that reconstruct the magnetic field during the interval 700–900 ka ago, including the MB reversal and Kamikatsura (KKT) excursion. Through model comparisons, the robustness of the models in resolving MB reversal characteristics is assessed. The majority of models indicate that the reversal was mainly driven by the axial dipole field contribution gradually decreasing, while non-dipole parts slightly increased. At the core-mantle boundary, two high-latitude reverse flux patches appear at the beginning of the reversal, and it seems like a few precursors in the form of regionally seen transitional field occurred, related to variations in the decaying dipole moment. The main global polarity change occurred close to 778 ka, with the axial dipole quickly strengthening in the opposite direction in the following, completing the full polarity transition. All the models confirm the previously reported asymmetry of slow dipole decay and fast recovery, and indicate that the dipole moment was clearly lower in the late Matuyama than the early Brunhes. The whole reversal process occurred on average between 800 and 770 ka, with a duration of approximately 30 kyr. Out of four apparent excursions discovered in some of the models between 900 and 800 ka, the KKT excursion (890–884 ka), can be confirmed as a robust magnetic field feature. Additional, well dated paleomagnetic records in particular from the southern hemisphere are required to confirm several details suggested by the models that should only be interpreted with caution so far.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1443095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paleomagnetic data enables the global reconstruction of the geomagnetic field, allowing the investigation of significant events like polarity reversals and excursions. When compared to prior polarity reversals, the most recent one, the Matuyama-Brunhes (MB), is the best recorded reversal in terms of number of available paleomagnetic data. Nevertheless, several of these data have poor age control, and they are not distributed equally worldwide. Few global models have been presented for the MB; the most recent is the GGFMB (Global Geomagnetic Field Model for the MB reversal). Limitations imposed by input data and subjective assumptions about the data that are made in modelling restrict the resolution and reliability of these models. This study presents a suite of eight additional global models that reconstruct the magnetic field during the interval 700–900 ka ago, including the MB reversal and Kamikatsura (KKT) excursion. Through model comparisons, the robustness of the models in resolving MB reversal characteristics is assessed. The majority of models indicate that the reversal was mainly driven by the axial dipole field contribution gradually decreasing, while non-dipole parts slightly increased. At the core-mantle boundary, two high-latitude reverse flux patches appear at the beginning of the reversal, and it seems like a few precursors in the form of regionally seen transitional field occurred, related to variations in the decaying dipole moment. The main global polarity change occurred close to 778 ka, with the axial dipole quickly strengthening in the opposite direction in the following, completing the full polarity transition. All the models confirm the previously reported asymmetry of slow dipole decay and fast recovery, and indicate that the dipole moment was clearly lower in the late Matuyama than the early Brunhes. The whole reversal process occurred on average between 800 and 770 ka, with a duration of approximately 30 kyr. Out of four apparent excursions discovered in some of the models between 900 and 800 ka, the KKT excursion (890–884 ka), can be confirmed as a robust magnetic field feature. Additional, well dated paleomagnetic records in particular from the southern hemisphere are required to confirm several details suggested by the models that should only be interpreted with caution so far.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet.
This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet.
The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science.
The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission.
General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.