Unlocking Sustainability Compliance: Characterizing the EU Taxonomy for Business Process Management

Finn Klessascheck, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Jan Mendling, Luise Pufahl
{"title":"Unlocking Sustainability Compliance: Characterizing the EU Taxonomy for Business Process Management","authors":"Finn Klessascheck, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Jan Mendling, Luise Pufahl","doi":"arxiv-2408.11386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To promote sustainable business practices, and to achieve climate neutrality\nby 2050, the EU has developed the taxonomy of sustainable activities, which\ndescribes when exactly business practices can be considered sustainable. While\nthe taxonomy has only been recently established, progressively more companies\nwill have to report how much of their revenue was created via sustainably\nexecuted business processes. To help companies prepare to assess whether their\nbusiness processes comply with the constraints outlined in the taxonomy, we\ninvestigate in how far these criteria can be used for conformance checking,\nthat is, assessing in a data-driven manner, whether business process executions\nadhere to regulatory constraints. For this, we develop a few-shot learning\npipeline to characterize the constraints of the taxonomy with the help of an\nLLM as to the process dimensions they relate to. We find that many constraints\nof the taxonomy are useable for conformance checking, particularly in the\nsectors of energy, manufacturing, and transport. This will aid companies in\npreparing to monitor regulatory compliance with the taxonomy automatically, by\ncharacterizing what kind of information they need to extract, and by providing\na better understanding of sectors where such an assessment is feasible and\nwhere it is not.","PeriodicalId":501123,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Databases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Databases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote sustainable business practices, and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, the EU has developed the taxonomy of sustainable activities, which describes when exactly business practices can be considered sustainable. While the taxonomy has only been recently established, progressively more companies will have to report how much of their revenue was created via sustainably executed business processes. To help companies prepare to assess whether their business processes comply with the constraints outlined in the taxonomy, we investigate in how far these criteria can be used for conformance checking, that is, assessing in a data-driven manner, whether business process executions adhere to regulatory constraints. For this, we develop a few-shot learning pipeline to characterize the constraints of the taxonomy with the help of an LLM as to the process dimensions they relate to. We find that many constraints of the taxonomy are useable for conformance checking, particularly in the sectors of energy, manufacturing, and transport. This will aid companies in preparing to monitor regulatory compliance with the taxonomy automatically, by characterizing what kind of information they need to extract, and by providing a better understanding of sectors where such an assessment is feasible and where it is not.
揭开可持续性合规的神秘面纱:描述欧盟业务流程管理分类标准
为了促进可持续的商业行为,并在 2050 年前实现气候中和,欧盟制定了可持续活动分类法,规定了商业行为在什么情况下可以被视为可持续的。虽然该分类标准最近才制定,但将有越来越多的公司必须报告其收入中有多少是通过可持续执行的业务流程创造的。为了帮助企业准备评估其业务流程是否符合分类标准中列出的约束条件,我们研究了这些标准在多大程度上可用于一致性检查,即以数据驱动的方式评估业务流程的执行是否符合法规约束条件。为此,我们开发了一个少量学习管道,在 LLM 的帮助下对分类法的约束条件进行描述,以确定它们所涉及的流程维度。我们发现,分类标准中的许多约束条件都可用于一致性检查,尤其是在能源、制造和运输等行业。这将有助于公司准备自动监控分类标准的法规遵从情况,方法是确定他们需要提取哪类信息,并更好地了解哪些部门可以进行此类评估,哪些部门不可以。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信