A theoretical underpinning of the pesticide Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS)

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Tammo S. Steenhuis, Naaran Brindt, Steven Pacenka, Brian K. Richards, J.-Yves Parlange, Bahareh Hassanpour
{"title":"A theoretical underpinning of the pesticide Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS)","authors":"Tammo S. Steenhuis, Naaran Brindt, Steven Pacenka, Brian K. Richards, J.-Yves Parlange, Bahareh Hassanpour","doi":"10.2478/johh-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS) is widely used to indicate the relative leachability of pesticides based on the soil half-life and the adsorption partition coefficient. In this manuscript, we derive mathematically the Theoretical Groundwater Ubiquity Score (TGUS) that, based on considerations of the preferential movement of pesticides to groundwater and a first-order pesticide degradation model, leads to a similar function as the GUS model. In the preferential flow model, movement to groundwater is fast, and the adsorption partition coefficient is thus not used for calculating the travel time to the groundwater (as it is in the advective-dispersive equation) but rather only determines the distribution of the pesticide between the water and soil phases. Both the GUS and TGUS models well predict the groundwater contamination of the originally studied pesticides for rainfall event(s) that caused pesticide leaching from 30 days after application. The theoretically derived Groundwater Ubiquity Score (TGUS) shows, in accordance with experimental evidence, that for leaching events shortly after spraying, the mass lost to (and resulting concentration in) groundwater is inversely related to the adsorption partition coefficient and not necessarily to the GUS index.","PeriodicalId":50183,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2024-0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS) is widely used to indicate the relative leachability of pesticides based on the soil half-life and the adsorption partition coefficient. In this manuscript, we derive mathematically the Theoretical Groundwater Ubiquity Score (TGUS) that, based on considerations of the preferential movement of pesticides to groundwater and a first-order pesticide degradation model, leads to a similar function as the GUS model. In the preferential flow model, movement to groundwater is fast, and the adsorption partition coefficient is thus not used for calculating the travel time to the groundwater (as it is in the advective-dispersive equation) but rather only determines the distribution of the pesticide between the water and soil phases. Both the GUS and TGUS models well predict the groundwater contamination of the originally studied pesticides for rainfall event(s) that caused pesticide leaching from 30 days after application. The theoretically derived Groundwater Ubiquity Score (TGUS) shows, in accordance with experimental evidence, that for leaching events shortly after spraying, the mass lost to (and resulting concentration in) groundwater is inversely related to the adsorption partition coefficient and not necessarily to the GUS index.
农药地下水普遍性评分(GUS)的理论基础
根据土壤半衰期和吸附分配系数,地下水独特性得分(GUS)被广泛用于表示农药的相对浸出性。在本手稿中,我们根据农药向地下水的优先流动和一阶农药降解模型,从数学上推导出了理论地下水泛滥得分(TGUS),其函数与 GUS 模型类似。在优先流动模型中,向地下水的流动是快速的,因此吸附分配系数并不用于计算向地下水的流动时间(就像在平流-分散方程中那样),而只是决定农药在水相和土相之间的分布。GUS 和 TGUS 模型都能很好地预测最初研究的农药在施用后 30 天内造成农药沥滤的降雨事件对地下水的污染情况。理论上得出的地下水普遍性得分(TGUS)显示,与实验证据一致,在喷洒后不久发生的沥滤事件中,流失到地下水中的质量(以及由此产生的浓度)与吸附分配系数成反比,而不一定与 GUS 指数成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS is an international open access journal for the basic disciplines of water sciences. The scope of hydrology is limited to biohydrology, catchment hydrology and vadose zone hydrology, primarily of temperate zone. The hydromechanics covers theoretical, experimental and computational hydraulics and fluid mechanics in various fields, two- and multiphase flows, including non-Newtonian flow, and new frontiers in hydraulics. The journal is published quarterly in English. The types of contribution include: research and review articles, short communications and technical notes. The articles have been thoroughly peer reviewed by international specialists and promoted to researchers working in the same field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信