Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study

Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li
{"title":"Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study","authors":"Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li","doi":"arxiv-2409.04834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As software systems grow increasingly intricate, the precise detection of\nanomalies have become both essential and challenging. Current log-based anomaly\ndetection methods depend heavily on vast amounts of log data leading to\ninefficient inference and potential misguidance by noise logs. However, the\nquantitative effects of log reduction on the effectiveness of anomaly detection\nremain unexplored. Therefore, we first conduct a comprehensive study on six\ndistinct models spanning three datasets. Through the study, the impact of log\nquantity and their effectiveness in representing anomalies is qualifies,\nuncovering three distinctive log event types that differently influence model\nperformance. Drawing from these insights, we propose LogCleaner: an efficient\nmethodology for the automatic reduction of log events in the context of anomaly\ndetection. Serving as middleware between software systems and models,\nLogCleaner continuously updates and filters anti-events and duplicative-events\nin the raw generated logs. Experimental outcomes highlight LogCleaner's\ncapability to reduce over 70% of log events in anomaly detection, accelerating\nthe model's inference speed by approximately 300%, and universally improving\nthe performance of models for anomaly detection.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As software systems grow increasingly intricate, the precise detection of anomalies have become both essential and challenging. Current log-based anomaly detection methods depend heavily on vast amounts of log data leading to inefficient inference and potential misguidance by noise logs. However, the quantitative effects of log reduction on the effectiveness of anomaly detection remain unexplored. Therefore, we first conduct a comprehensive study on six distinct models spanning three datasets. Through the study, the impact of log quantity and their effectiveness in representing anomalies is qualifies, uncovering three distinctive log event types that differently influence model performance. Drawing from these insights, we propose LogCleaner: an efficient methodology for the automatic reduction of log events in the context of anomaly detection. Serving as middleware between software systems and models, LogCleaner continuously updates and filters anti-events and duplicative-events in the raw generated logs. Experimental outcomes highlight LogCleaner's capability to reduce over 70% of log events in anomaly detection, accelerating the model's inference speed by approximately 300%, and universally improving the performance of models for anomaly detection.
减少事件以增强基于日志的异常检测模型:实证研究
随着软件系统日益复杂,精确检测异常变得既重要又具有挑战性。当前基于日志的异常检测方法严重依赖大量日志数据,导致推断效率低下,并可能受到噪声日志的误导。然而,日志缩减对异常检测有效性的定量影响仍未得到探索。因此,我们首先对跨越三个数据集的六个不同模型进行了全面研究。通过这项研究,我们确定了日志数量的影响及其在表示异常情况时的有效性,并发现了三种对模型性能产生不同影响的独特日志事件类型。根据这些见解,我们提出了日志清理器:一种在异常检测中自动减少日志事件的高效方法。作为软件系统和模型之间的中间件,LogCleaner 不断更新和过滤原始生成日志中的反事件和重复事件。实验结果表明,LogCleaner 能够在异常检测中减少 70% 以上的日志事件,将模型的推理速度提高了约 300%,并普遍提高了异常检测模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信