The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nayeon Yi, Dain Baik, Gumhee Baek
{"title":"The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies","authors":"Nayeon Yi, Dain Baik, Gumhee Baek","doi":"10.1111/jnu.13024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAccurate and rapid triage can reduce undertriage and overtriage, which may improve emergency department flow. This study aimed to identify the effects of a prospective study applying artificial intelligence‐based triage in the clinical field.DesignSystematic review of prospective studies.MethodsCINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, KISS, and RISS were searched from March 9 to April 18, 2023. All the data were screened independently by three researchers. The review included prospective studies that measured outcomes related to AI‐based triage. Three researchers extracted data and independently assessed the study's quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) protocol.ResultsOf 1633 studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for this review. Most studies applied machine learning to triage, and only one was based on fuzzy logic. All studies, except one, utilized a five‐level triage classification system. Regarding model performance, the feed‐forward neural network achieved a precision of 33% in the level 1 classification, whereas the fuzzy clip model achieved a specificity and sensitivity of 99%. The accuracy of the model's triage prediction ranged from 80.5% to 99.1%. Other outcomes included time reduction, overtriage and undertriage checks, mistriage factors, and patient care and prognosis outcomes.ConclusionTriage nurses in the emergency department can use artificial intelligence as a supportive means for triage. Ultimately, we hope to be a resource that can reduce undertriage and positively affect patient health.Protocol RegistrationWe have registered our review in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD 42023415232).","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"284 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAccurate and rapid triage can reduce undertriage and overtriage, which may improve emergency department flow. This study aimed to identify the effects of a prospective study applying artificial intelligence‐based triage in the clinical field.DesignSystematic review of prospective studies.MethodsCINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, KISS, and RISS were searched from March 9 to April 18, 2023. All the data were screened independently by three researchers. The review included prospective studies that measured outcomes related to AI‐based triage. Three researchers extracted data and independently assessed the study's quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) protocol.ResultsOf 1633 studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for this review. Most studies applied machine learning to triage, and only one was based on fuzzy logic. All studies, except one, utilized a five‐level triage classification system. Regarding model performance, the feed‐forward neural network achieved a precision of 33% in the level 1 classification, whereas the fuzzy clip model achieved a specificity and sensitivity of 99%. The accuracy of the model's triage prediction ranged from 80.5% to 99.1%. Other outcomes included time reduction, overtriage and undertriage checks, mistriage factors, and patient care and prognosis outcomes.ConclusionTriage nurses in the emergency department can use artificial intelligence as a supportive means for triage. Ultimately, we hope to be a resource that can reduce undertriage and positively affect patient health.Protocol RegistrationWe have registered our review in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD 42023415232).
将人工智能应用于急诊科分诊的效果:前瞻性研究的系统回顾
导言:准确、快速的分诊可以减少漏诊和过度分诊,从而改善急诊科的就诊流程。本研究旨在确定一项在临床领域应用基于人工智能的分诊的前瞻性研究的效果。方法从 2023 年 3 月 9 日至 4 月 18 日,对 CINAHL、Cochrane、Embase、PubMed、ProQuest、KISS 和 RISS 进行了检索。所有数据均由三名研究人员独立筛选。该综述纳入了衡量与基于人工智能的分诊相关的结果的前瞻性研究。三位研究人员提取了数据,并采用加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)协议对研究质量进行了独立评估。结果在 1633 项研究中,有 7 项符合本综述的纳入标准。大多数研究采用机器学习进行分流,只有一项研究基于模糊逻辑。除一项研究外,所有研究都采用了五级分流分类系统。在模型性能方面,前馈神经网络在一级分类中的精确度为 33%,而模糊剪辑模型的特异性和灵敏度均达到 99%。模型的分流预测准确率在 80.5% 到 99.1% 之间。其他结果包括时间减少、过度分诊和过度分诊检查、错误分诊因素以及患者护理和预后结果。最终,我们希望成为一种资源,能够减少误诊,并对患者健康产生积极影响。协议注册我们已在 PROSPERO 注册了我们的综述(注册号:CRD 42023415232)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信