Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Camille Desjardins, Marion Fortin, Marc Ohana, Hayley German
{"title":"Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare","authors":"Camille Desjardins, Marion Fortin, Marc Ohana, Hayley German","doi":"10.1177/10596011241273336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telework arrangements remain popular since they have been “normalized” in the context of the pandemic. Telework may help reduce the gender gap in access to work despite women’s prominent role in caring responsibilities. However, the work experience and career effects of such arrangements may also be gendered, particularly given the increased number of cross-domain interruptions that tend to accompany telework. We investigated the gendered effects of cross-domain interruptions between childcare and telework through a mixed methods approach, including a daily diary study with 339 teleworking parents and semi-structured interviews with 16 teleworking mothers and 16 teleworking fathers. We find that childcare-to-work interruptions have negative effects on the fulfillment of career motives, on work engagement and emotional exhaustion, for both men and women. The effects of work-to-childcare interruptions are, however, different for men compared to women, with only women’s perceived daily balance being negatively affected. Interestingly, men even benefit from some positive effects of these interruptions, which allow them to experience more daily authenticity and challenge. Our qualitative findings help to interpret these findings by suggesting gender motive differences with women reporting more relational and (to a smaller extent) uncertainty related work motives. The interview data also illustrate how various approaches to the division of household labor and boundary management may contribute to gendered interruption experiences. Overall, these findings illustrate how the daily experiences of teleworkers can contribute to growing gender gaps in terms of career and wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241273336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telework arrangements remain popular since they have been “normalized” in the context of the pandemic. Telework may help reduce the gender gap in access to work despite women’s prominent role in caring responsibilities. However, the work experience and career effects of such arrangements may also be gendered, particularly given the increased number of cross-domain interruptions that tend to accompany telework. We investigated the gendered effects of cross-domain interruptions between childcare and telework through a mixed methods approach, including a daily diary study with 339 teleworking parents and semi-structured interviews with 16 teleworking mothers and 16 teleworking fathers. We find that childcare-to-work interruptions have negative effects on the fulfillment of career motives, on work engagement and emotional exhaustion, for both men and women. The effects of work-to-childcare interruptions are, however, different for men compared to women, with only women’s perceived daily balance being negatively affected. Interestingly, men even benefit from some positive effects of these interruptions, which allow them to experience more daily authenticity and challenge. Our qualitative findings help to interpret these findings by suggesting gender motive differences with women reporting more relational and (to a smaller extent) uncertainty related work motives. The interview data also illustrate how various approaches to the division of household labor and boundary management may contribute to gendered interruption experiences. Overall, these findings illustrate how the daily experiences of teleworkers can contribute to growing gender gaps in terms of career and wellbeing.
妇女在远程工作中的双重惩罚:工作与育儿间中断的性别效应的混合方法调查
远程工作安排在大流行病的背景下已经 "正常化",因此仍然很受欢迎。尽管妇女在护理责任方面发挥着突出作用,但远程工作可能有助于缩小工作机会方面的性别差距。然而,这种安排对工作经验和职业生涯的影响也可能是性别化的,特别是考虑到伴随远程工作而来的跨领域中断次数往往会增加。我们采用混合方法,包括对 339 名远程工作父母的每日日记研究,以及对 16 名远程工作母亲和 16 名远程工作父亲的半结构式访谈,调查了育儿和远程工作之间跨领域中断的性别影响。我们发现,无论对男性还是女性而言,从育儿到工作的中断都会对职业动机的实现、工作投入和情感疲惫产生负面影响。然而,工作与育儿间断对男性和女性的影响是不同的,只有女性的日常平衡感受到了负面影响。有趣的是,男性甚至还能从这些中断的一些积极影响中受益,这使他们能够体验到更多的日常真实性和挑战性。我们的定性研究结果表明了性别动机的差异,女性报告了更多的关系动机和(在较小程度上)与不确定性相关的工作动机,从而有助于解释这些研究结果。访谈数据还说明了家务劳动分工和边界管理的各种方法是如何促成性别中断体验的。总之,这些研究结果说明了远程工作者的日常经历如何在职业和福利方面造成性别差距的扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信