Self-healing in leprosy: A systematic review

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sophie C. W. Stuetzle, Ann-Kristin Bonkass, Wim H. van Brakel, Anne Schoenmakers, Anil Fastenau
{"title":"Self-healing in leprosy: A systematic review","authors":"Sophie C. W. Stuetzle, Ann-Kristin Bonkass, Wim H. van Brakel, Anne Schoenmakers, Anil Fastenau","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0012434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Leprosy, caused by <jats:italic>Mycobacterium leprae</jats:italic>, affects multiple body systems and can lead to preventable disability if untreated. While multidrug therapy (MDT) has been available since 1982, historical evidence suggests that untreated leprosy can resolve spontaneously. Nevertheless, the prevalence of self-healing worldwide, as well as factors determining self-healing, remain unclear. Methods A systematic review was conducted in 2023 with data from PubMed, Infolep, and Web of Sciences data bases, along with a google search. Data extraction and analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and were summarized in a separate Excel sheet. Included were English-language studies on self-healing in leprosy, regardless the year of publication. Results We included six studies spanning from 1938 to 1978 exploring the incidence of self-healing in different countries and continents. Children, paucibacillary (PB) cases, and possibly males showed a higher probability of self-healing with an average healing time of two years. Discussion/Conclusion Recent research on self-healing in leprosy is scarce and evidence limited. This is primarily due to ethical concerns regarding withholding effective treatment of diagnosed patients, and because of the absence of an agreed definition of self-healing. Nevertheless, self-healing appears to be a plausible phenomenon influenced by geographic and demographic factors, and the type of leprosy. We recommend further research on self-healing in leprosy, as it provides insight into the human immune system and the determinants of this phenomenon. More insight could help adapt clinical practices and public health strategies, thereby contributing to an effective management and control of this disease.","PeriodicalId":20260,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012434","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, affects multiple body systems and can lead to preventable disability if untreated. While multidrug therapy (MDT) has been available since 1982, historical evidence suggests that untreated leprosy can resolve spontaneously. Nevertheless, the prevalence of self-healing worldwide, as well as factors determining self-healing, remain unclear. Methods A systematic review was conducted in 2023 with data from PubMed, Infolep, and Web of Sciences data bases, along with a google search. Data extraction and analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and were summarized in a separate Excel sheet. Included were English-language studies on self-healing in leprosy, regardless the year of publication. Results We included six studies spanning from 1938 to 1978 exploring the incidence of self-healing in different countries and continents. Children, paucibacillary (PB) cases, and possibly males showed a higher probability of self-healing with an average healing time of two years. Discussion/Conclusion Recent research on self-healing in leprosy is scarce and evidence limited. This is primarily due to ethical concerns regarding withholding effective treatment of diagnosed patients, and because of the absence of an agreed definition of self-healing. Nevertheless, self-healing appears to be a plausible phenomenon influenced by geographic and demographic factors, and the type of leprosy. We recommend further research on self-healing in leprosy, as it provides insight into the human immune system and the determinants of this phenomenon. More insight could help adapt clinical practices and public health strategies, thereby contributing to an effective management and control of this disease.
麻风病的自愈:系统综述
背景麻风病由麻风分枝杆菌引起,影响身体多个系统,如不及时治疗,可导致可预防的残疾。虽然自 1982 年起就开始使用多药疗法 (MDT),但历史证据表明,未经治疗的麻风病可以自愈。然而,全球自愈率以及决定自愈的因素仍不清楚。方法 2023 年,我们利用 PubMed、Infolep 和 Web of Sciences 数据库中的数据以及谷歌搜索进行了一次系统性综述。数据提取和分析遵循 PRISMA 指南,并在单独的 Excel 表中进行了汇总。纳入的研究均为关于麻风病自愈的英文研究,不论发表年份。结果 我们纳入了六项研究,时间跨度从 1938 年到 1978 年,探讨了不同国家和大陆的麻风病自愈率。儿童、贫脓疱型 (PB) 病例以及可能是男性的麻风病人自愈率较高,平均自愈时间为两年。讨论/结论 最近关于麻风病自愈的研究很少,证据有限。这主要是由于对已确诊患者不予有效治疗的伦理考虑,以及缺乏对自愈的一致定义。不过,自愈似乎是一种可信的现象,受到地理、人口因素以及麻风病类型的影响。我们建议进一步研究麻风病的自愈现象,因为这有助于深入了解人体免疫系统及其决定因素。更深入的了解有助于调整临床实践和公共卫生策略,从而促进麻风病的有效管理和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信