Example-Generation Tasks for Computer-Aided Assessment in University Mathematics Education: Insights From A Study Conducted in Two Educational Contexts

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maria Fahlgren, Alice Barana, Mats Brunström, Marina Marchisio Conte, Fabio Roman, Matteo Sacchet, Mirela Vinerean, Yosief Wondmagegne
{"title":"Example-Generation Tasks for Computer-Aided Assessment in University Mathematics Education: Insights From A Study Conducted in Two Educational Contexts","authors":"Maria Fahlgren, Alice Barana, Mats Brunström, Marina Marchisio Conte, Fabio Roman, Matteo Sacchet, Mirela Vinerean, Yosief Wondmagegne","doi":"10.1007/s40753-024-00252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, there has been rapid development in digital technologies for automated assessment. Through enhanced possibilities in terms of algorithms, grading codes, adaptivity, and feedback, they are suitable for formative assessment. There is a need to develop computer-aided assessment (CAA) tasks that target higher-order mathematical skills to ensure a balanced assessment approach beyond basic procedural skills. To address this issue, research suggests the approach of asking students to generate examples. This study focuses on an example-generation task on polynomial function understanding, proposed to 205 first-year engineering students in Sweden and 111 first-year biotechnology students in Italy. Students were encouraged to collaborate in small groups, but individual elements within the tasks required each group member to provide individual answers. Students' responses kept in the CAA system were qualitatively analyzed to understand the effectiveness of the task in extending the students’ example space in diverse educational contexts. The findings indicate a difference in students’ example spaces when performing the task between the two educational contexts. The results suggest key strengths and possible improvements to the task design.</p>","PeriodicalId":42532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-024-00252-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been rapid development in digital technologies for automated assessment. Through enhanced possibilities in terms of algorithms, grading codes, adaptivity, and feedback, they are suitable for formative assessment. There is a need to develop computer-aided assessment (CAA) tasks that target higher-order mathematical skills to ensure a balanced assessment approach beyond basic procedural skills. To address this issue, research suggests the approach of asking students to generate examples. This study focuses on an example-generation task on polynomial function understanding, proposed to 205 first-year engineering students in Sweden and 111 first-year biotechnology students in Italy. Students were encouraged to collaborate in small groups, but individual elements within the tasks required each group member to provide individual answers. Students' responses kept in the CAA system were qualitatively analyzed to understand the effectiveness of the task in extending the students’ example space in diverse educational contexts. The findings indicate a difference in students’ example spaces when performing the task between the two educational contexts. The results suggest key strengths and possible improvements to the task design.

Abstract Image

大学数学教育中计算机辅助评估的例题生成任务:在两种教育背景下开展的一项研究的启示
近几十年来,用于自动评估的数字技术发展迅速。通过增强算法、评分代码、适应性和反馈等方面的可能性,它们适用于形成性评价。有必要开发针对高阶数学技能的计算机辅助评测(CAA)任务,以确保除基本程序技能外,还有均衡的评测方法。为解决这一问题,研究建议采用让学生生成示例的方法。本研究的重点是一项关于多项式函数理解的示例生成任务,该任务是为瑞典的 205 名工程专业一年级学生和意大利的 111 名生物技术专业一年级学生设计的。我们鼓励学生进行小组合作,但任务中的个别内容要求每个小组成员提供单独的答案。我们对保存在 CAA 系统中的学生回答进行了定性分析,以了解任务在不同教育背景下扩展学生范例空间的有效性。研究结果表明,在两种教育背景下,学生在完成任务时的范例空间存在差异。结果表明了任务设计的主要优势和可能的改进之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education is dedicated to the interests of post secondary mathematics learning and teaching. It welcomes original research, including empirical, theoretical, and methodological reports of learning and teaching of undergraduate and graduate students.The journal contains insights on mathematics education from introductory courses such as calculus to higher level courses such as linear algebra, all the way through advanced courses in analysis and abstract algebra. It is also a venue for research that focuses on graduate level mathematics teaching and learning as well as research that examines how mathematicians go about their professional practice. In addition, the journal is an outlet for the publication of mathematics education research conducted in other tertiary settings, such as technical and community colleges. It provides the intellectual foundation for improving university mathematics teaching and learning and it will address specific problems in the secondary-tertiary transition. The journal contains original research reports in post-secondary mathematics. Empirical reports must be theoretically and methodologically rigorous. Manuscripts describing theoretical and methodological advances are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信