“This is not my forte”: examining the impact of cultural dimensions, teacher support, and self-efficacy on university student learned helplessness

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hang Thanh Pham, Minh Ngoc Do
{"title":"“This is not my forte”: examining the impact of cultural dimensions, teacher support, and self-efficacy on university student learned helplessness","authors":"Hang Thanh Pham, Minh Ngoc Do","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-01-2024-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>University students often encounter academic challenges and setbacks, which can impact their beliefs about their capabilities, leading to a phenomenon known as learned helplessness. This study explores the antecedents of learned helplessness through the interaction between teacher support, self-efficacy, and cultural dimensions such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Drawing from constructivism, the authors empirically examined a conceptual model utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM). A total of 268 university students completed a self-survey on learned helplessness via a Google Form.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study shows that LH is influenced by personal attributes, perceived support, and cultural context. Higher self-efficacy is linked to lower LH scores, while teacher support indirectly affects LH through self-efficacy. Power distance and uncertainty avoidance also directly impact LH. Additionally, cultural influences indirectly affect LH through perceived support and self-efficacy. However, the hypothesized connections between masculinity and LH were not supported.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study advances LH literature by exploring it among university students using a multidimensional, constructivist approach, providing valuable insights for educational authorities. We illuminate how individual, social, and cultural factors influence LH, underscoring the serial mediation between self-efficacy and perceived teacher support. Existing literature frequently overlooks the intricate interplay among cultural dimensions and other factors, limiting the formulation of comprehensive solutions. Our research breaks new ground in quantitative LH examination within education, delving into Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and suggesting strategies to mitigate uncertainty and power distance for student well-being and success.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":"172 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2024-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

University students often encounter academic challenges and setbacks, which can impact their beliefs about their capabilities, leading to a phenomenon known as learned helplessness. This study explores the antecedents of learned helplessness through the interaction between teacher support, self-efficacy, and cultural dimensions such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing from constructivism, the authors empirically examined a conceptual model utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM). A total of 268 university students completed a self-survey on learned helplessness via a Google Form.

Findings

The study shows that LH is influenced by personal attributes, perceived support, and cultural context. Higher self-efficacy is linked to lower LH scores, while teacher support indirectly affects LH through self-efficacy. Power distance and uncertainty avoidance also directly impact LH. Additionally, cultural influences indirectly affect LH through perceived support and self-efficacy. However, the hypothesized connections between masculinity and LH were not supported.

Originality/value

The study advances LH literature by exploring it among university students using a multidimensional, constructivist approach, providing valuable insights for educational authorities. We illuminate how individual, social, and cultural factors influence LH, underscoring the serial mediation between self-efficacy and perceived teacher support. Existing literature frequently overlooks the intricate interplay among cultural dimensions and other factors, limiting the formulation of comprehensive solutions. Our research breaks new ground in quantitative LH examination within education, delving into Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and suggesting strategies to mitigate uncertainty and power distance for student well-being and success.

"这不是我的专长":研究文化维度、教师支持和自我效能对大学生习得性无助感的影响
目的大学生经常会遇到学业挑战和挫折,这会影响他们对自己能力的信念,从而导致一种被称为习得性无助感的现象。本研究通过教师支持、自我效能感以及权力距离、不确定性规避和男性气质等文化维度之间的相互作用,探讨了习得性无助感的前因。设计/方法/途径作者从建构主义出发,利用结构方程模型(SEM)对概念模型进行了实证研究。共有 268 名大学生通过谷歌表格完成了关于习得性无助感的自我调查。研究结果研究表明,习得性无助感受个人特质、感知支持和文化背景的影响。较高的自我效能感与较低的习得性无助感得分相关,而教师的支持则通过自我效能感间接影响习得性无助感。权力距离和不确定性规避也直接影响 LH。此外,文化影响通过感知支持和自我效能间接影响 LH。原创性/价值本研究采用多维建构主义方法探讨了大学生的 LH 问题,从而推动了 LH 文献的发展,为教育当局提供了宝贵的见解。我们阐明了个人、社会和文化因素如何影响 LH,强调了自我效能感和感知到的教师支持之间的序列中介作用。现有文献往往忽视了文化维度和其他因素之间错综复杂的相互作用,从而限制了综合解决方案的制定。我们的研究为教育领域的 LH 定量分析开辟了新天地,深入研究了霍夫斯泰德的文化维度,并提出了缓解不确定性和权力距离的策略,以促进学生的幸福和成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信