Different diversities: Policies and practices at three European public service VoD services

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Cathrin Bengesser, Jannick Kirk Sørensen
{"title":"Different diversities: Policies and practices at three European public service VoD services","authors":"Cathrin Bengesser, Jannick Kirk Sørensen","doi":"10.1177/13548565241270897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While globally operating SVoDs have discovered identity-based diversity as a branding strategy, diversity has a longer history and broader meaning in public service media (PSM) tied to the foundational ideals of universality and pluralism that oblige PSM to speak to all members of a society and to offer diverse programmes and viewpoints. We investigate: How are these two understandings of ‘diversity’ expressed 1) in legal and policy requirements to the PSM, 2) in strategy papers and audits issued by PSM, 3) in the presentation and exposure of content in VoD interfaces? And 4) How can PSMs' practice around diversity on VoD be tracked methodologically? The article examines these questions by comparing: BBC iPlayer (UK), DRTV (Denmark) and ARD Mediathek (Germany). A document analysis examines how legal remits and strategies governing these institutions talk about diversity. We analyse the presentation and exposure of ‘diversity’ in VoD content via longitudinal datasets that document the three VoD landing pages daily between early 2022 and late 2023, recording the position of every programme title at the VoDs’ front pages, as well as deck titles. We test four approaches to this dataset: Spotting diversity in deck titles, looking for content tagged as diverse on IMDb and by Chat GPT, calculating diversity of exposed content with the Gini-Simpson-Index and assessing diversity through a manual coding of deck titles and sampling content displayed in selected decks. The article shows how differently diversity can be conceptualised and operationalised in VoD practice and concludes that multi-dimensional methodological approaches are needed. This article is a report on different publishing strategies for ‘diversity content’ in PSM VoD interfaces; a discussion of the conflicting relation between public service ideals and the notion of identity-based ‘branded diversity' of globally operating VoDs; and a contribution to developing methods for monitoring diversity on VoD.","PeriodicalId":47242,"journal":{"name":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241270897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While globally operating SVoDs have discovered identity-based diversity as a branding strategy, diversity has a longer history and broader meaning in public service media (PSM) tied to the foundational ideals of universality and pluralism that oblige PSM to speak to all members of a society and to offer diverse programmes and viewpoints. We investigate: How are these two understandings of ‘diversity’ expressed 1) in legal and policy requirements to the PSM, 2) in strategy papers and audits issued by PSM, 3) in the presentation and exposure of content in VoD interfaces? And 4) How can PSMs' practice around diversity on VoD be tracked methodologically? The article examines these questions by comparing: BBC iPlayer (UK), DRTV (Denmark) and ARD Mediathek (Germany). A document analysis examines how legal remits and strategies governing these institutions talk about diversity. We analyse the presentation and exposure of ‘diversity’ in VoD content via longitudinal datasets that document the three VoD landing pages daily between early 2022 and late 2023, recording the position of every programme title at the VoDs’ front pages, as well as deck titles. We test four approaches to this dataset: Spotting diversity in deck titles, looking for content tagged as diverse on IMDb and by Chat GPT, calculating diversity of exposed content with the Gini-Simpson-Index and assessing diversity through a manual coding of deck titles and sampling content displayed in selected decks. The article shows how differently diversity can be conceptualised and operationalised in VoD practice and concludes that multi-dimensional methodological approaches are needed. This article is a report on different publishing strategies for ‘diversity content’ in PSM VoD interfaces; a discussion of the conflicting relation between public service ideals and the notion of identity-based ‘branded diversity' of globally operating VoDs; and a contribution to developing methods for monitoring diversity on VoD.
不同的多样性:欧洲三家公共网络视频服务机构的政策与实践
在全球运营的 SVoD 将基于身份的多样性作为品牌战略的同时,多样性在公共服务媒体(PSM)中有着更悠久的历史和更广泛的含义,它与普遍性和多元化的基本理想息息相关,这些理想要求公共服务媒体面向社会的所有成员,提供多样化的节目和观点。我们对此进行了研究:这两种对 "多样性 "的理解是如何表达的:1)在法律和政策对公共广播事业的要求中;2)在公共广播事业发布的战略文件和审计中;3)在网络视频点播界面的内容展示和曝光中?4) 如何从方法上跟踪 PSM 在 VoD 多样性方面的实践?本文通过比较以下几个方面来探讨这些问题:BBC iPlayer(英国)、DRTV(丹麦)和 ARD Mediathek(德国)。通过文件分析,研究了这些机构的法律职责和战略是如何谈论多样性的。我们通过纵向数据集分析了网络视频内容中 "多样性 "的表现形式和曝光情况,这些数据集记录了 2022 年初至 2023 年末三个网络视频登陆页面的日常情况,记录了每个节目标题在网络视频首页的位置以及甲板标题。我们对该数据集进行了四种方法测试:在甲板标题中发现多样性、在 IMDb 和 Chat GPT 上寻找标记为多样性的内容、使用吉尼-辛普森指数计算曝光内容的多样性,以及通过对甲板标题进行手动编码和对选定甲板中显示的内容进行抽样来评估多样性。文章展示了在网络视频实践中如何以不同的方式对多样性进行概念化和操作化,并得出结论:需要多维度的方法论。这篇文章报告了在 PSM 网络视频点播界面中 "多样性内容 "的不同发布策略;讨论了全球运营的网络视频点播的公共服务理想与基于身份的 "品牌多样性 "概念之间的冲突关系;以及对开发网络视频点播多样性监测方法的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信