Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging assessment of conduction system pacing device: a novel algorithm to assess intraventricular synchrony

Ivan Eltsov, Alvise Del Monte, Luigi Pannone, INGRID OVEREINDER, Domenico Della Rocca, Roberto Scacciavillani, Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge, Qingguo Zeng, Gezim Bala, Andrea Paparella, Giacomo Talevi, Erwin Stroker, Juan Sieira, Ali Gharaviri, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Mark La Meir, Carlo de Asmundis, Alexandre Almorad
{"title":"Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging assessment of conduction system pacing device: a novel algorithm to assess intraventricular synchrony","authors":"Ivan Eltsov, Alvise Del Monte, Luigi Pannone, INGRID OVEREINDER, Domenico Della Rocca, Roberto Scacciavillani, Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge, Qingguo Zeng, Gezim Bala, Andrea Paparella, Giacomo Talevi, Erwin Stroker, Juan Sieira, Ali Gharaviri, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Mark La Meir, Carlo de Asmundis, Alexandre Almorad","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.14.24311086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Left Bundle bracnch area pacing has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compare to RV apex pacing. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with LBBAP device using ECG imaging. Methods. 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation have been included in the study. ECG and ECGI analysys have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, LVAT, RVAT and V1AD were calculated using ECG. TVACT, LVACT, LVACTi, RVACT, RVACTi and IVDS were calculated based on ECGI.\nAll patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Results All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. Study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and LVAT) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between ECG and ECGI analysys was identified. Two additional 12 lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found.\nFollow up did not show any worsening of device parameters or Echographic and ECG signs of ventricular dissynchrony Conclusions ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison to intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined and corresponding 12 lead parameters were also identified.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Left Bundle bracnch area pacing has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compare to RV apex pacing. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with LBBAP device using ECG imaging. Methods. 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation have been included in the study. ECG and ECGI analysys have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, LVAT, RVAT and V1AD were calculated using ECG. TVACT, LVACT, LVACTi, RVACT, RVACTi and IVDS were calculated based on ECGI. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Results All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. Study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and LVAT) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between ECG and ECGI analysys was identified. Two additional 12 lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found. Follow up did not show any worsening of device parameters or Echographic and ECG signs of ventricular dissynchrony Conclusions ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison to intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined and corresponding 12 lead parameters were also identified.
传导系统起搏装置的无创心电图成像评估:评估心室内同步性的新算法
背景。左束臂区起搏已成为包括房室传导阻滞在内的各种适应症的首选治疗方法,与左室心尖起搏相比,左束臂区起搏被认为是一种生理起搏方式。研究目的本研究旨在利用心电图成像评估 LBBAP 装置患者的心室激活和同步性。方法研究对象包括 25 名连续接受 LBBAP 装置植入术的患者。植入后第二天进行心电图和心电图成像分析。通过心电图计算原始和起搏 QRS、LVAT、RVAT 和 V1AD。根据 ECGI 计算 TVACT、LVACT、LVACTi、RVACT、RVACTi 和 IVDS。结果 根据内在心电图和起搏心电图参数将所有患者分为两组(宽QRS和窄QRS)。研究显示,最初的窄 QRS 组起搏时的激活时间和同步性与本征相似。而宽 QRS 组的这些参数则明显改善。对于起搏心律分析,经典的心电图 LBBAP 参数(起搏 QRS 和 LVAT)不足以正确评估起搏心律的心室激活情况。心电图和心电图成像分析之间存在不一致。结论 心电图成像可为评估新起搏模式的疗效带来重要价值,并为精确确定植入结果提供更多数据,包括详细的激活评估以及与内在传导的比较。确认心室适当激活的关键心电图成像值已经确定,相应的 12 导联参数也已确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信