Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition Affect Soil Respiration in Northern Hardwood Forests

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
T. A. Mann, R. D. Yanai, T. J. Fahey, A. B. Reinmann
{"title":"Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition Affect Soil Respiration in Northern Hardwood Forests","authors":"T. A. Mann, R. D. Yanai, T. J. Fahey, A. B. Reinmann","doi":"10.1007/s10021-024-00912-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil respiration is the largest single efflux in the global carbon cycle and varies in complex ways with climate, vegetation, and soils. The suppressive effect of nitrogen (N) addition on soil respiration is well documented, but the extent to which it may be moderated by stand age or the availability of soil phosphorus (P) is not well understood. We quantified the response of soil respiration to manipulation of soil N and P availability in a full-factorial N x P fertilization experiment spanning 10 years in 13 northern hardwood forests in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, USA. We analyzed data for 2011 alone, to account for potential treatment effects unique to the first year of fertilization, and for three 3-year periods; data from each 3-year period was divided into spring, summer, and fall. Nitrogen addition consistently suppressed soil respiration by up to 14% relative to controls (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01 for the main effect of N in 5 of 10 analysis periods). This response was tempered when P was also added, reducing the suppressive effect of N addition from 24 to 1% in one of the ten analysis periods (summer 2012–2014, <i>p</i> = 0.01 for the interaction of N and P). This interaction effect is consistent with observations of reduced foliar N and available soil N following P addition. Mid-successional stands (26–41 years old at the time of the first nutrient addition) consistently had the lowest rates of soil respiration across stand age classes (1.4–6.6 µmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), and young stands had the highest (2.5–8.5 µmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). In addition to these important effects of treatment and stand age, we observed an unexpected increase in soil respiration, which doubled in 10 years and was not explained by soil temperature patterns, nutrient additions, or increased in fine-root biomass.</p>","PeriodicalId":11406,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00912-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil respiration is the largest single efflux in the global carbon cycle and varies in complex ways with climate, vegetation, and soils. The suppressive effect of nitrogen (N) addition on soil respiration is well documented, but the extent to which it may be moderated by stand age or the availability of soil phosphorus (P) is not well understood. We quantified the response of soil respiration to manipulation of soil N and P availability in a full-factorial N x P fertilization experiment spanning 10 years in 13 northern hardwood forests in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, USA. We analyzed data for 2011 alone, to account for potential treatment effects unique to the first year of fertilization, and for three 3-year periods; data from each 3-year period was divided into spring, summer, and fall. Nitrogen addition consistently suppressed soil respiration by up to 14% relative to controls (p ≤ 0.01 for the main effect of N in 5 of 10 analysis periods). This response was tempered when P was also added, reducing the suppressive effect of N addition from 24 to 1% in one of the ten analysis periods (summer 2012–2014, p = 0.01 for the interaction of N and P). This interaction effect is consistent with observations of reduced foliar N and available soil N following P addition. Mid-successional stands (26–41 years old at the time of the first nutrient addition) consistently had the lowest rates of soil respiration across stand age classes (1.4–6.6 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1), and young stands had the highest (2.5–8.5 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1). In addition to these important effects of treatment and stand age, we observed an unexpected increase in soil respiration, which doubled in 10 years and was not explained by soil temperature patterns, nutrient additions, or increased in fine-root biomass.

Abstract Image

氮和磷的添加会影响北部阔叶林的土壤呼吸作用
土壤呼吸是全球碳循环中最大的单项流出量,并随着气候、植被和土壤的变化而发生复杂的变化。氮(N)添加对土壤呼吸的抑制作用已得到充分证实,但其受林龄或土壤磷(P)可用性影响的程度还不十分清楚。我们在美国新罕布什尔州白山的 13 个北方阔叶林中进行了为期 10 年的全因子氮x磷施肥实验,量化了土壤呼吸对土壤氮和磷供应量的影响。我们仅分析了 2011 年的数据,以考虑施肥第一年可能产生的独特处理效果,并分析了三个 3 年期的数据;每个 3 年期的数据分为春季、夏季和秋季。与对照组相比,氮的添加持续抑制了土壤呼吸作用,最高达 14%(在 10 个分析期中的 5 个分析期,氮的主效应 p ≤ 0.01)。当同时添加磷时,这一反应有所缓和,在 10 个分析期中的一个分析期(2012-2014 年夏季,氮和磷的交互作用 p = 0.01),添加氮的抑制作用从 24% 降至 1%。这种交互作用效果与叶面氮和可用土壤氮在添加磷后减少的观察结果一致。中生林分(首次添加养分时树龄为 26-41 年)的土壤呼吸速率在所有林分年龄等级中一直最低(1.4-6.6 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1),而幼林分则最高(2.5-8.5 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1)。除了处理和林分年龄的这些重要影响外,我们还观察到土壤呼吸作用意外增加,10 年内增加了一倍,而土壤温度模式、养分添加或细根生物量的增加都无法解释这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems
Ecosystems 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The study and management of ecosystems represent the most dynamic field of contemporary ecology. Ecosystem research bridges fundamental ecology and environmental ecology and environmental problem-solving, and spans boundaries of scale, discipline and perspective. Ecosystems features a distinguished team of editors-in-chief and an outstanding international editorial board, and is seen worldwide as a vital home for publishing significant research as well as editorials, mini-reviews and special features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信