From Rangelands to Cropland, Land-Use Change and Its Impact on Soil Organic Carbon Variables in a Peruvian Andean Highlands: A Machine Learning Modeling Approach

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mariella Carbajal, David A. Ramírez, Cecilia Turin, Sean M. Schaeffer, Julie Konkel, Johan Ninanya, Javier Rinza, Felipe De Mendiburu, Percy Zorogastua, Liliana Villaorduña, Roberto Quiroz
{"title":"From Rangelands to Cropland, Land-Use Change and Its Impact on Soil Organic Carbon Variables in a Peruvian Andean Highlands: A Machine Learning Modeling Approach","authors":"Mariella Carbajal, David A. Ramírez, Cecilia Turin, Sean M. Schaeffer, Julie Konkel, Johan Ninanya, Javier Rinza, Felipe De Mendiburu, Percy Zorogastua, Liliana Villaorduña, Roberto Quiroz","doi":"10.1007/s10021-024-00928-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Andean highland soils contain significant quantities of soil organic carbon (SOC); however, more efforts still need to be made to understand the processes behind the accumulation and persistence of SOC and its fractions. This study modeled SOC variables—SOC, refractory SOC (RSOC), and the <sup>13</sup>C isotope composition of SOC (δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>SOC</sub>)—using machine learning (ML) algorithms in the Central Andean Highlands of Peru, where grasslands and wetlands (“bofedales”) dominate the landscape surrounded by Junin National Reserve. A total of 198 soil samples (0.3 m depth) were collected to assess SOC variables. Four ML algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB)—were used to model SOC variables using remote sensing data, land-use and land-cover (LULC, nine categories), climate topography, and sampled physical–chemical soil variables. RF was the best algorithm for SOC and δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>SOC</sub> prediction, whereas ANN was the best to model RSOC. “Bofedales” showed 2–3 times greater SOC (11.2 ± 1.60%) and RSOC (1.10 ± 0.23%) and more depleted δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>SOC</sub> (− 27.0 ± 0.44 ‰) than other LULC, which reflects high C persistent, turnover rates, and plant productivity. This highlights the importance of “bofedales” as SOC reservoirs. LULC and vegetation indices close to the near-infrared bands were the most critical environmental predictors to model C variables SOC and δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>SOC</sub>. In contrast, climatic indices were more important environmental predictors for RSOC. This study’s outcomes suggest the potential of ML methods, with a particular emphasis on RF, for mapping SOC and its fractions in the Andean highlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00928-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Andean highland soils contain significant quantities of soil organic carbon (SOC); however, more efforts still need to be made to understand the processes behind the accumulation and persistence of SOC and its fractions. This study modeled SOC variables—SOC, refractory SOC (RSOC), and the 13C isotope composition of SOC (δ13CSOC)—using machine learning (ML) algorithms in the Central Andean Highlands of Peru, where grasslands and wetlands (“bofedales”) dominate the landscape surrounded by Junin National Reserve. A total of 198 soil samples (0.3 m depth) were collected to assess SOC variables. Four ML algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB)—were used to model SOC variables using remote sensing data, land-use and land-cover (LULC, nine categories), climate topography, and sampled physical–chemical soil variables. RF was the best algorithm for SOC and δ13CSOC prediction, whereas ANN was the best to model RSOC. “Bofedales” showed 2–3 times greater SOC (11.2 ± 1.60%) and RSOC (1.10 ± 0.23%) and more depleted δ13CSOC (− 27.0 ± 0.44 ‰) than other LULC, which reflects high C persistent, turnover rates, and plant productivity. This highlights the importance of “bofedales” as SOC reservoirs. LULC and vegetation indices close to the near-infrared bands were the most critical environmental predictors to model C variables SOC and δ13CSOC. In contrast, climatic indices were more important environmental predictors for RSOC. This study’s outcomes suggest the potential of ML methods, with a particular emphasis on RF, for mapping SOC and its fractions in the Andean highlands.

Abstract Image

秘鲁安第斯高地从牧场到耕地的土地利用变化及其对土壤有机碳变量的影响:机器学习建模方法
安第斯高原土壤含有大量的土壤有机碳(SOC);然而,要了解 SOC 及其组分的积累和持久性背后的过程,仍需付出更多努力。本研究利用机器学习(ML)算法,在秘鲁中安第斯高地模拟了 SOC 变量--SOC、难溶解 SOC(RSOC)和 SOC 的 13C 同位素组成(δ13CSOC)。为评估 SOC 变量,共采集了 198 个土壤样本(0.3 米深)。利用遥感数据、土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC,九个类别)、气候地形以及取样的物理化学土壤变量,使用四种 ML 算法--随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和极端梯度提升(XGB)--对 SOC 变量进行建模。RF 是预测 SOC 和 δ13CSOC 的最佳算法,而 ANN 则是模拟 RSOC 的最佳算法。与其他 LULC 相比,"Bofedales "的 SOC(11.2 ± 1.60%)和 RSOC(1.10 ± 0.23%)高出 2-3 倍,δ13CSOC(- 27.0 ± 0.44 ‰)更贫化,这反映了高碳持久性、高周转率和高植物生产力。这凸显了 "bofedales "作为 SOC 储库的重要性。接近近红外波段的土地利用、土地利用变化和植被指数是模拟 C 变量 SOC 和 δ13CSOC 的最关键环境预测因子。相比之下,气候指数是 RSOC 更重要的环境预测因子。这项研究的结果表明,以射频为重点的 ML 方法在绘制安第斯高地的 SOC 及其组分图方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信