{"title":"Prophet modeling for oil production forecasting in an enhanced oil recovery field","authors":"H. K. Chavan, R. K. Sinharay","doi":"10.1063/5.0224299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate daily oil production forecasting is essential for efficient reservoir management and investment strategy. Forecasting oil production in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and conformance-dominated fields is a complex process due to the nonlinear, voluminous, and often uncertain nature of reservoir parameters and hidden factors. As a result, conventional tools such as decline curve analysis frequently fail to accurately predict daily oil production in conformance-controlled areas. In contrast, machine learning works efficiently for large datasets, even if the parameter values are unknown. The current study employs a Prophet time series forecasting method for five oil production wells in an EOR applied field, but it fails to achieve the desired sweep efficiency. This study compares the results of conventional decline curve analysis (DCA) and popular autoregressive integrated moving average time series forecasting methods with the Prophet model. This is the first attempt to use Prophet for oil well production forecasting, where polymer flooding is used. In all, 60% of the data are used for training, and the remaining 40% are used for testing. The Prophet shows the best performance for all the wells. This study is also the first to handle shut-in data using the Prophet model for oil production. Well-2 achieves the highest accuracy after incorporating shut-in results, with an R2 score of 92%. The result shows that though the DCA performs reasonably well with higher linearity and trend stationary data, Prophet modeling shows superior results than conventional DCA for all EOR applied producing wells.","PeriodicalId":20066,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate daily oil production forecasting is essential for efficient reservoir management and investment strategy. Forecasting oil production in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and conformance-dominated fields is a complex process due to the nonlinear, voluminous, and often uncertain nature of reservoir parameters and hidden factors. As a result, conventional tools such as decline curve analysis frequently fail to accurately predict daily oil production in conformance-controlled areas. In contrast, machine learning works efficiently for large datasets, even if the parameter values are unknown. The current study employs a Prophet time series forecasting method for five oil production wells in an EOR applied field, but it fails to achieve the desired sweep efficiency. This study compares the results of conventional decline curve analysis (DCA) and popular autoregressive integrated moving average time series forecasting methods with the Prophet model. This is the first attempt to use Prophet for oil well production forecasting, where polymer flooding is used. In all, 60% of the data are used for training, and the remaining 40% are used for testing. The Prophet shows the best performance for all the wells. This study is also the first to handle shut-in data using the Prophet model for oil production. Well-2 achieves the highest accuracy after incorporating shut-in results, with an R2 score of 92%. The result shows that though the DCA performs reasonably well with higher linearity and trend stationary data, Prophet modeling shows superior results than conventional DCA for all EOR applied producing wells.
期刊介绍:
Physics of Fluids (PoF) is a preeminent journal devoted to publishing original theoretical, computational, and experimental contributions to the understanding of the dynamics of gases, liquids, and complex or multiphase fluids. Topics published in PoF are diverse and reflect the most important subjects in fluid dynamics, including, but not limited to:
-Acoustics
-Aerospace and aeronautical flow
-Astrophysical flow
-Biofluid mechanics
-Cavitation and cavitating flows
-Combustion flows
-Complex fluids
-Compressible flow
-Computational fluid dynamics
-Contact lines
-Continuum mechanics
-Convection
-Cryogenic flow
-Droplets
-Electrical and magnetic effects in fluid flow
-Foam, bubble, and film mechanics
-Flow control
-Flow instability and transition
-Flow orientation and anisotropy
-Flows with other transport phenomena
-Flows with complex boundary conditions
-Flow visualization
-Fluid mechanics
-Fluid physical properties
-Fluid–structure interactions
-Free surface flows
-Geophysical flow
-Interfacial flow
-Knudsen flow
-Laminar flow
-Liquid crystals
-Mathematics of fluids
-Micro- and nanofluid mechanics
-Mixing
-Molecular theory
-Nanofluidics
-Particulate, multiphase, and granular flow
-Processing flows
-Relativistic fluid mechanics
-Rotating flows
-Shock wave phenomena
-Soft matter
-Stratified flows
-Supercritical fluids
-Superfluidity
-Thermodynamics of flow systems
-Transonic flow
-Turbulent flow
-Viscous and non-Newtonian flow
-Viscoelasticity
-Vortex dynamics
-Waves