VoiceWukong: Benchmarking Deepfake Voice Detection

Ziwei Yan, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang
{"title":"VoiceWukong: Benchmarking Deepfake Voice Detection","authors":"Ziwei Yan, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang","doi":"arxiv-2409.06348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid advancement of technologies like text-to-speech (TTS) and\nvoice conversion (VC), detecting deepfake voices has become increasingly\ncrucial. However, both academia and industry lack a comprehensive and intuitive\nbenchmark for evaluating detectors. Existing datasets are limited in language\ndiversity and lack many manipulations encountered in real-world production\nenvironments. To fill this gap, we propose VoiceWukong, a benchmark designed to evaluate\nthe performance of deepfake voice detectors. To build the dataset, we first\ncollected deepfake voices generated by 19 advanced and widely recognized\ncommercial tools and 15 open-source tools. We then created 38 data variants\ncovering six types of manipulations, constructing the evaluation dataset for\ndeepfake voice detection. VoiceWukong thus includes 265,200 English and 148,200\nChinese deepfake voice samples. Using VoiceWukong, we evaluated 12\nstate-of-the-art detectors. AASIST2 achieved the best equal error rate (EER) of\n13.50%, while all others exceeded 20%. Our findings reveal that these detectors\nface significant challenges in real-world applications, with dramatically\ndeclining performance. In addition, we conducted a user study with more than\n300 participants. The results are compared with the performance of the 12\ndetectors and a multimodel large language model (MLLM), i.e., Qwen2-Audio,\nwhere different detectors and humans exhibit varying identification\ncapabilities for deepfake voices at different deception levels, while the LALM\ndemonstrates no detection ability at all. Furthermore, we provide a leaderboard\nfor deepfake voice detection, publicly available at\n{https://voicewukong.github.io}.","PeriodicalId":501284,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - EE - Audio and Speech Processing","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - EE - Audio and Speech Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of technologies like text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC), detecting deepfake voices has become increasingly crucial. However, both academia and industry lack a comprehensive and intuitive benchmark for evaluating detectors. Existing datasets are limited in language diversity and lack many manipulations encountered in real-world production environments. To fill this gap, we propose VoiceWukong, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of deepfake voice detectors. To build the dataset, we first collected deepfake voices generated by 19 advanced and widely recognized commercial tools and 15 open-source tools. We then created 38 data variants covering six types of manipulations, constructing the evaluation dataset for deepfake voice detection. VoiceWukong thus includes 265,200 English and 148,200 Chinese deepfake voice samples. Using VoiceWukong, we evaluated 12 state-of-the-art detectors. AASIST2 achieved the best equal error rate (EER) of 13.50%, while all others exceeded 20%. Our findings reveal that these detectors face significant challenges in real-world applications, with dramatically declining performance. In addition, we conducted a user study with more than 300 participants. The results are compared with the performance of the 12 detectors and a multimodel large language model (MLLM), i.e., Qwen2-Audio, where different detectors and humans exhibit varying identification capabilities for deepfake voices at different deception levels, while the LALM demonstrates no detection ability at all. Furthermore, we provide a leaderboard for deepfake voice detection, publicly available at {https://voicewukong.github.io}.
悟空语音:深度伪语音检测基准测试
随着文本到语音(TTS)和语音转换(VC)等技术的快速发展,检测深度假语音变得越来越重要。然而,学术界和工业界都缺乏一个全面、直观的基准来评估检测器。现有数据集的语言多样性有限,而且缺乏在真实世界生产环境中遇到的许多操作。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了 "语音悟空"(VoiceWukong),这是一个用于评估深度假声检测器性能的基准。为了建立该数据集,我们首先收集了由 19 种先进且广受认可的商业工具和 15 种开源工具生成的深度伪造语音。然后,我们创建了 38 个数据变体,涵盖了六种操作类型,构建了假语音检测的评估数据集。因此,"悟空语音 "包含 26.52 万个英文和 14.82 万个中文深假语音样本。利用 "悟空语音",我们对 12 种最先进的检测器进行了评估。其中,AASIST2 的平均错误率(EER)最高,为 13.50%,而其他所有检测器的平均错误率都超过了 20%。我们的研究结果表明,这些检测器在实际应用中面临巨大挑战,性能急剧下降。此外,我们还对 300 多名参与者进行了用户研究。结果与 12 个检测器和多模型大语言模型(MLLM)(即 Qwen2-Audio)的性能进行了比较,不同检测器和人类在不同的欺骗水平下对深层伪语音表现出不同的识别能力,而 LALM 则完全没有表现出检测能力。此外,我们还提供了深度伪造语音检测的排行榜,可在{https://voicewukong.github.io}上公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信