Teachers’ social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper
{"title":"Teachers’ social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom","authors":"Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (<i>N</i> = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (N = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.

教师的社交能力、职业健康和个人幸福感与他们在课堂上使用冷笑话有关
冷嘲热讽是一种语言攻击形式,它利用幽默来贬低受害者。本研究探讨了美国教师在课堂上使用 "讽刺 "的预测因素。幼儿园至十二年级的教师(人数= 516)自我报告了他们的社会和情感能力(即:透视、宽恕、正念、表达压抑和决策技能)、职业健康体验和个人幸福感(即:职业倦怠、工作满意度、抑郁和生活满意度)以及使用讥讽的情况。逐步多层次模型表明,教师的社会和情感能力,以及随后的职业健康和幸福感,在很大程度上解释了教师使用 "刻薄话 "的差异。具体而言,具有较强的透视能力的教师较少使用讽刺语言,而那些使用表达性压制的教师使用讽刺语言的频率较高。职业倦怠、工作满意度、抑郁和生活满意度都与更多地使用讽刺语言呈正相关。研究结果与有关成人社交和情感能力、教师职业健康和幸福感以及教师冲突管理策略的研究相关联。本研究为今后调查教师使用 "咆哮 "对学生成绩的影响奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology of Education
Social Psychology of Education PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The field of social psychology spans the boundary between the disciplines of psychology and sociology and has traditionally been associated with empirical research. Many studies of human behaviour in education are conducted by persons who identify with social psychology or whose work falls into the social psychological ambit. Several textbooks have been published and a variety of courses are being offered on the `social psychology of education'', but no journal has hitherto appeared to cover the field. Social Psychology of Education fills this gap, covering a wide variety of content concerns, theoretical interests and research methods, among which are: Content concerns: classroom instruction decision making in education educational innovation concerns for gender, race, ethnicity and social class knowledge creation, transmission and effects leadership in schools and school systems long-term effects of instructional processes micropolitics of schools student cultures and interactions teacher recruitment and careers teacher- student relations Theoretical interests: achievement motivation attitude theory attribution theory conflict management and the learning of pro-social behaviour cultural and social capital discourse analysis group dynamics role theory social exchange theory social transition social learning theory status attainment symbolic interaction the study of organisations Research methods: comparative research experiments formal observations historical studies literature reviews panel studies qualitative methods sample surveys For social psychologists with a special interest in educational matters, educational researchers with a social psychological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信