Differences in Injury Patterns and Delays in Care-Seeking Behaviors in the Anabaptist Population.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Marsha Salzwedel,Heather Xenia Rhodes-Lyons,Elizabeth Kracht
{"title":"Differences in Injury Patterns and Delays in Care-Seeking Behaviors in the Anabaptist Population.","authors":"Marsha Salzwedel,Heather Xenia Rhodes-Lyons,Elizabeth Kracht","doi":"10.1097/jtn.0000000000000807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe lifestyle differences of Anabaptists and their views on health care may yield different injury patterns than standard populations and require a customized approach to injury prevention and health care delivery.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo identify differences in injury patterns and delays in care-seeking behaviors among the Anabaptists in Wisconsin.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from (23 years) January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2023. Local Trauma Registry data collected patient demographics, injury details, morbidity outcomes, in-hospital mortality, and preexisting comorbidity. Anabaptist trauma patients were isolated by confirmed identification in the Trauma Registry. The analysis utilized both descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model with the outcome of Anabaptist.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 14,431 patients were included in the analysis; 81 (0.4%) were confirmed as Anabaptist. The Anabaptist population showed a higher likelihood of helicopter transportation (odds ratio [OR] 4.64, p < .01) and an activation of Pediatric Level I (OR 4.07, p < .01). As the emergency department shock index increased by one unit, the odds of being Anabaptist increased by 9.87 (p < .01). The injury mechanisms that were associated with the Anabaptist population included buggy collisions (OR 312.58, p < .01), caught or crushed (OR 5.21, p = .01), machinery (OR 5.38, p < .01), near drowning (OR 14.09, p < .01), scooter (OR 13.93, p = .04), and woodworking (OR 12.81, p = .01).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study identified differences in injury patterns and delays in care-seeking behaviors in the Anabaptist population.","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The lifestyle differences of Anabaptists and their views on health care may yield different injury patterns than standard populations and require a customized approach to injury prevention and health care delivery. OBJECTIVE To identify differences in injury patterns and delays in care-seeking behaviors among the Anabaptists in Wisconsin. METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from (23 years) January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2023. Local Trauma Registry data collected patient demographics, injury details, morbidity outcomes, in-hospital mortality, and preexisting comorbidity. Anabaptist trauma patients were isolated by confirmed identification in the Trauma Registry. The analysis utilized both descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model with the outcome of Anabaptist. RESULTS A total of 14,431 patients were included in the analysis; 81 (0.4%) were confirmed as Anabaptist. The Anabaptist population showed a higher likelihood of helicopter transportation (odds ratio [OR] 4.64, p < .01) and an activation of Pediatric Level I (OR 4.07, p < .01). As the emergency department shock index increased by one unit, the odds of being Anabaptist increased by 9.87 (p < .01). The injury mechanisms that were associated with the Anabaptist population included buggy collisions (OR 312.58, p < .01), caught or crushed (OR 5.21, p = .01), machinery (OR 5.38, p < .01), near drowning (OR 14.09, p < .01), scooter (OR 13.93, p = .04), and woodworking (OR 12.81, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS This study identified differences in injury patterns and delays in care-seeking behaviors in the Anabaptist population.
再洗礼派人群的受伤模式和延迟就医行为的差异。
背景再洗礼派教徒的生活方式差异及其对医疗保健的看法可能会导致他们的受伤模式与普通人群不同,因此需要采用定制的方法来预防受伤和提供医疗保健服务。方法这项单中心回顾性队列研究的时间跨度为 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日(23 年)。当地创伤登记处的数据收集了患者的人口统计学特征、受伤细节、发病结果、院内死亡率和原有合并症。再洗礼派创伤患者是通过在创伤登记处的确认身份而被分离出来的。结果共有 14,431 名患者被纳入分析,其中 81 人(0.4%)被确认为再洗礼派。重洗派患者使用直升机转运的可能性更高(比值比 [OR] 4.64,p < .01),儿科 I 级的启动率更高(比值比 4.07,p < .01)。当急诊科休克指数增加一个单位时,成为再洗礼派的几率增加了 9.87(P < .01)。与再洗礼派人群相关的受伤机制包括:马车碰撞(OR 312.58,p < .01)、夹伤或压伤(OR 5.21,p = .01)、机械伤害(OR 5.38,p < .01)、溺水(OR 14.结论本研究确定了再洗礼派人群在受伤模式和延迟寻求护理行为方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信