Needlessly Treated: Evaluation of Prehospital Needle Thoracostomy.

Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1097/jtn.0000000000000808
Gabriel E Vazquez,John R Calhoun,Elizabeth A Fuchsen,Jeannette M Capella,Cory C Vaudt,Richard A Sidwell,Hayden L Smith,Carlos A Pelaez
{"title":"Needlessly Treated: Evaluation of Prehospital Needle Thoracostomy.","authors":"Gabriel E Vazquez,John R Calhoun,Elizabeth A Fuchsen,Jeannette M Capella,Cory C Vaudt,Richard A Sidwell,Hayden L Smith,Carlos A Pelaez","doi":"10.1097/jtn.0000000000000808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNeedle thoracostomy is a potentially life-saving intervention for tension pneumothorax but may be overused, potentially leading to unnecessary morbidity.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo review prehospital needle thoracostomy indications, effectiveness, and adverse outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA retrospective cohort study was conducted based on registry data for a United States Midwestern Level I trauma center for a 7.5-year period (January 2015 to May 2022). Included were patients who received prehospital needle thoracostomy and trauma activation before hospital arrival. The primary outcomes were correct indications and improvement in vital signs. Secondary outcomes were the need for chest tubes, correct needle placement, complications, and survival.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of n = 67 patients were reviewed, of which n = 63 (94%) received a prehospital thoracostomy. Of the 63 prehospital thoracostomies, 54 (86%) survived to arrival. Of these 54, 44 (n = 81%) had documented reduced/absent breath sounds, 15 (28%) hypotension, and 19 (35%) with difficulty breathing/ventilating. Only four patients met all three prehospital trauma life support criteria: hypotension, difficulty ventilating, and absent breath sounds. There were no significant changes in prehospital vitals before and after receiving needle thoracostomy. In patients receiving imaging (n = 54), there was evidence of 15 (28%) lung lacerations, 6 (11%) of which had a pneumothorax and 3 (5%) near misses of important structures. Review of needle catheters visible on computer tomography imaging found 11 outside the chest and 1 in the abdominal cavity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe study presents evidence of potential needle thoracostomy overuse and morbidity. Adherence to specific guidelines for needle decompression is needed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"293 1","pages":"242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Needle thoracostomy is a potentially life-saving intervention for tension pneumothorax but may be overused, potentially leading to unnecessary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To review prehospital needle thoracostomy indications, effectiveness, and adverse outcomes. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on registry data for a United States Midwestern Level I trauma center for a 7.5-year period (January 2015 to May 2022). Included were patients who received prehospital needle thoracostomy and trauma activation before hospital arrival. The primary outcomes were correct indications and improvement in vital signs. Secondary outcomes were the need for chest tubes, correct needle placement, complications, and survival. RESULTS A total of n = 67 patients were reviewed, of which n = 63 (94%) received a prehospital thoracostomy. Of the 63 prehospital thoracostomies, 54 (86%) survived to arrival. Of these 54, 44 (n = 81%) had documented reduced/absent breath sounds, 15 (28%) hypotension, and 19 (35%) with difficulty breathing/ventilating. Only four patients met all three prehospital trauma life support criteria: hypotension, difficulty ventilating, and absent breath sounds. There were no significant changes in prehospital vitals before and after receiving needle thoracostomy. In patients receiving imaging (n = 54), there was evidence of 15 (28%) lung lacerations, 6 (11%) of which had a pneumothorax and 3 (5%) near misses of important structures. Review of needle catheters visible on computer tomography imaging found 11 outside the chest and 1 in the abdominal cavity. CONCLUSION The study presents evidence of potential needle thoracostomy overuse and morbidity. Adherence to specific guidelines for needle decompression is needed.
分享
查看原文
不必要的治疗:评估院前针刺胸腔造口术。
背景针刺胸腔造口术是一种治疗张力性气胸的潜在救生干预措施,但可能被过度使用,从而导致不必要的发病率。方法根据美国中西部一级创伤中心 7.5 年(2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月)的登记数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括接受院前针刺胸廓造口术的患者,以及在到达医院前接受创伤激活的患者。主要结果是适应症的正确性和生命体征的改善。结果共回顾了 n = 67 例患者,其中 n = 63 例(94%)接受了院前胸腔造口术。在 63 例院前胸腔造口术患者中,54 例(86%)在到达医院后存活。在这 54 人中,44 人(n = 81%)有呼吸音减弱/消失的记录,15 人(28%)有低血压,19 人(35%)有呼吸/换气困难。只有四名患者符合所有三项院前创伤生命支持标准:低血压、呼吸困难和呼吸音消失。接受针刺胸腔造口术前后的院前生命体征没有明显变化。在接受影像学检查的患者中(n = 54),有证据表明有 15 例(28%)肺裂伤,其中 6 例(11%)有气胸,3 例(5%)近乎误伤重要结构。对计算机断层扫描成像中可见的针式导管进行复查后发现,11 根导管位于胸腔外,1 根导管位于腹腔内。需要遵守针头减压的具体指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信