{"title":"Simulating stellar coronal rain and slingshot prominences","authors":"Simon Daley-Yates, Moira Jardine","doi":"arxiv-2409.07297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have numerically demonstrated that simulated cool star coronae naturally\nform condensations. If the star rotates slowly, with a co-rotation radius\ngreater than the Alfv\\'{e}n radius (i.e. $R_{\\mathrm{K}} > R_{\\mathrm{A}}$),\nthese condensations will form below the co-rotation radius $R_{\\mathrm{K}}$ and\nsimply fall back to the stellar surface as coronal rain. If, however, the star\nis more rapidly rotating, ($R_{\\mathrm{K}} < R_{\\mathrm{A}}$), not only rain\nwill form but also ``slingshot prominences''. In this case, condensations\ncollect into a large mass reservoir around the co-rotation radius, from which\nperiodic centrifugal ejections occur. In this case, some $51\\%$ of the coronal\nmass is cold gas, either in rain or prominences. We find that 21\\% of the mass\nlost by our simulated fast rotating star is cold gas. Studies of stellar\nmass-loss from the hot wind do not consider this component of the wind and\ntherefore systematically underestimate mass-loss rates of these stars.\nCentrifugal ejections happen periodically, between every 7.5 - 17.5 hours with\nmasses clustering around $10^{16}$ g, These results agree well with\nobservational statistics. Contrasting the fast and slow rotating\nmagnetospheres, we find that there are two distinct types of solutions, high\nlying and low lying loops. Low lying loops only produce coronal rain whereas\nhigh lying loops produce both rain and slingshots.","PeriodicalId":501068,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We have numerically demonstrated that simulated cool star coronae naturally
form condensations. If the star rotates slowly, with a co-rotation radius
greater than the Alfv\'{e}n radius (i.e. $R_{\mathrm{K}} > R_{\mathrm{A}}$),
these condensations will form below the co-rotation radius $R_{\mathrm{K}}$ and
simply fall back to the stellar surface as coronal rain. If, however, the star
is more rapidly rotating, ($R_{\mathrm{K}} < R_{\mathrm{A}}$), not only rain
will form but also ``slingshot prominences''. In this case, condensations
collect into a large mass reservoir around the co-rotation radius, from which
periodic centrifugal ejections occur. In this case, some $51\%$ of the coronal
mass is cold gas, either in rain or prominences. We find that 21\% of the mass
lost by our simulated fast rotating star is cold gas. Studies of stellar
mass-loss from the hot wind do not consider this component of the wind and
therefore systematically underestimate mass-loss rates of these stars.
Centrifugal ejections happen periodically, between every 7.5 - 17.5 hours with
masses clustering around $10^{16}$ g, These results agree well with
observational statistics. Contrasting the fast and slow rotating
magnetospheres, we find that there are two distinct types of solutions, high
lying and low lying loops. Low lying loops only produce coronal rain whereas
high lying loops produce both rain and slingshots.