Feasibility of Measuring Magnetic Resonance Elastography-derived Stiffness in Human Thoracic Aorta and Aortic Dissection Phantoms

Adnan A Hirad, Faisal S. Fakhouri, Brian Raterman, Ronald Lakony, Maxwell Wang, Dakota Gonring, Baqir Kedwai, Arunark Kolipaka, Doran A Mix
{"title":"Feasibility of Measuring Magnetic Resonance Elastography-derived Stiffness in Human Thoracic Aorta and Aortic Dissection Phantoms","authors":"Adnan A Hirad, Faisal S. Fakhouri, Brian Raterman, Ronald Lakony, Maxwell Wang, Dakota Gonring, Baqir Kedwai, Arunark Kolipaka, Doran A Mix","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.05.611548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) represents a serious medical emergency with up to a 50% associated 5-year mortality caused by thoracic aorta, dissection-associated aneurysmal (DAA) degeneration, and rupture. Unfortunately, conventional size related diagnostic methods cannot distinguish high-risk DAAs that benefit from surgical intervention from stable DAAs. Our goal is to use DAA stiffness measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a biomarker to distinguish high-risk DAAs from stable DAAs. This is a feasibility study using MRE to 1) fabricate human-like geometries TBAD phantoms with different stiffnesses. 2) measure stiffness in TBAD phantoms with rheometry and 3) demonstrate the first successful application of MRE to the thoracic aorta of a human volunteer. Aortic dissection phantoms with heterogenous wall stiffness demonstrated the correlation between MRE-derived stiffness and rheometric measured stiffness. A pilot scan was performed in a healthy volunteer to test the technique's feasibility in the thoracic aorta.","PeriodicalId":501308,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.611548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) represents a serious medical emergency with up to a 50% associated 5-year mortality caused by thoracic aorta, dissection-associated aneurysmal (DAA) degeneration, and rupture. Unfortunately, conventional size related diagnostic methods cannot distinguish high-risk DAAs that benefit from surgical intervention from stable DAAs. Our goal is to use DAA stiffness measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a biomarker to distinguish high-risk DAAs from stable DAAs. This is a feasibility study using MRE to 1) fabricate human-like geometries TBAD phantoms with different stiffnesses. 2) measure stiffness in TBAD phantoms with rheometry and 3) demonstrate the first successful application of MRE to the thoracic aorta of a human volunteer. Aortic dissection phantoms with heterogenous wall stiffness demonstrated the correlation between MRE-derived stiffness and rheometric measured stiffness. A pilot scan was performed in a healthy volunteer to test the technique's feasibility in the thoracic aorta.
在人体胸主动脉和主动脉夹层模型中测量磁共振弹性成像衍生刚度的可行性
B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)是一种严重的医疗急症,由胸主动脉、夹层相关动脉瘤(DAA)变性和破裂引起的 5 年死亡率高达 50%。遗憾的是,传统的尺寸相关诊断方法无法将受益于手术干预的高风险 DAA 与稳定的 DAA 区分开来。我们的目标是利用磁共振弹性成像(MRE)测量的 DAA 硬度作为生物标志物,将高风险 DAA 与稳定型 DAA 区分开来。这是一项使用磁共振弹性成像技术进行的可行性研究:1)制作具有不同硬度的类人几何形状 TBAD 模型。2)用流变仪测量 TBAD 模型中的硬度;3)展示 MRE 在人类志愿者胸主动脉上的首次成功应用。主动脉夹层模型具有不同的壁僵硬度,证明了 MRE 导出的僵硬度与流变仪测量的僵硬度之间的相关性。对一名健康志愿者进行了试验性扫描,以测试该技术在胸主动脉中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信