Statistical analysis of adhesive rod-tube joints under tensile stress for structural applications

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
A. J. A. Vieira, R. D. S. G. Campilho, K. Madani
{"title":"Statistical analysis of adhesive rod-tube joints under tensile stress for structural applications","authors":"A. J. A. Vieira, R. D. S. G. Campilho, K. Madani","doi":"10.1007/s40430-024-05146-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adhesive bonding has been replacing traditional joining methods such as welding, bolting, and riveting in the design of mechanical structures in the automotive, aerospace and aeronautic industries. This joining method has several advantages over traditional methods such as ease of manufacture, lower costs, ease of joining different materials, higher fatigue resistance, and high corrosion resistance. Although tubular adhesive joints have varying applications, such as in truss structures and vehicles, machine axles, and piping, different joint configurations exist, such as rod-tube joints (RTJ), which are not conveniently addressed in the literature. This work compares the tensile performance of adhesively bonded RTJ between aluminium alloy components (AW6082-T651), considering the variation of the main geometric parameters: overlap length (<i>L</i><sub>O</sub>), tube thickness (<i>t</i><sub>S</sub>), rod diameter (<i>d</i>), adhesive fillet angle (<i>f</i>), and type of adhesive. The Taguchi’s method was employed in the elaboration of the applied design of experiments (DoE). To compare the RTJ behaviour, a numerical analysis was carried out through finite element analysis (FEA) and cohesive zone modelling (CZM). Peel (<i>σ</i><sub>y</sub>) and shear (<i>τ</i><sub>xy</sub>) stresses in the adhesive layer were initially obtained by applying purely elastic models. CZM modelling made possible to obtain the damage evolution in the adhesive layer, the maximum load (<i>P</i><sub>m</sub>) and dissipated energy (<i>U</i>) at <i>P</i><sub>m</sub> of the adhesive joints. As a result of applying the Taguchi method, the adhesive joint that showed the best overall performance used the adhesive Araldite<sup>®</sup> AV138, <i>L</i><sub>O</sub> = 40 mm, <i>d</i> = 20, and <i>t</i><sub>S</sub> = 3 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05146-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adhesive bonding has been replacing traditional joining methods such as welding, bolting, and riveting in the design of mechanical structures in the automotive, aerospace and aeronautic industries. This joining method has several advantages over traditional methods such as ease of manufacture, lower costs, ease of joining different materials, higher fatigue resistance, and high corrosion resistance. Although tubular adhesive joints have varying applications, such as in truss structures and vehicles, machine axles, and piping, different joint configurations exist, such as rod-tube joints (RTJ), which are not conveniently addressed in the literature. This work compares the tensile performance of adhesively bonded RTJ between aluminium alloy components (AW6082-T651), considering the variation of the main geometric parameters: overlap length (LO), tube thickness (tS), rod diameter (d), adhesive fillet angle (f), and type of adhesive. The Taguchi’s method was employed in the elaboration of the applied design of experiments (DoE). To compare the RTJ behaviour, a numerical analysis was carried out through finite element analysis (FEA) and cohesive zone modelling (CZM). Peel (σy) and shear (τxy) stresses in the adhesive layer were initially obtained by applying purely elastic models. CZM modelling made possible to obtain the damage evolution in the adhesive layer, the maximum load (Pm) and dissipated energy (U) at Pm of the adhesive joints. As a result of applying the Taguchi method, the adhesive joint that showed the best overall performance used the adhesive Araldite® AV138, LO = 40 mm, d = 20, and tS = 3 mm.

Abstract Image

结构应用中拉伸应力下粘接杆管接头的统计分析
在汽车、航空和航天工业的机械结构设计中,粘合剂粘接已逐渐取代焊接、螺栓连接和铆接等传统连接方法。与传统方法相比,这种连接方法具有多种优势,例如易于制造、成本较低、易于连接不同材料、抗疲劳性较高以及耐腐蚀性较强。虽然管状粘接接头的应用多种多样,例如在桁架结构和车辆、机器轴和管道中的应用,但也存在不同的接头结构,例如杆管接头(RTJ),而文献中对这种接头结构的介绍并不详尽。本研究比较了铝合金组件(AW6082-T651)之间粘合剂粘接 RTJ 的拉伸性能,考虑了主要几何参数的变化:重叠长度 (LO)、管子厚度 (tS)、杆直径 (d)、粘合剂圆角 (f) 和粘合剂类型。实验设计(DoE)采用了田口方法。为了比较 RTJ 的性能,通过有限元分析(FEA)和内聚区建模(CZM)进行了数值分析。粘合层中的剥离(σy)和剪切(τxy)应力最初是通过应用纯弹性模型获得的。通过 CZM 建模,可以获得粘合剂层的损伤演变、粘合剂接头 Pm 处的最大载荷 (Pm) 和耗散能量 (U)。应用田口方法的结果表明,总体性能最佳的粘合剂接头使用了 Araldite® AV138 粘合剂,LO = 40 mm,d = 20,tS = 3 mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
536
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering publishes manuscripts on research, development and design related to science and technology in Mechanical Engineering. It is an interdisciplinary journal with interfaces to other branches of Engineering, as well as with Physics and Applied Mathematics. The Journal accepts manuscripts in four different formats: Full Length Articles, Review Articles, Book Reviews and Letters to the Editor. Interfaces with other branches of engineering, along with physics, applied mathematics and more Presents manuscripts on research, development and design related to science and technology in mechanical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信