Comprehensive exploration of technological tensioning effects in welded thin plate girders: an in-depth investigation

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Hassanein I. Khalaf, D. Chodorowska, Raheem Al-Sabur, Andrzej Kubit, Wojciech Macek
{"title":"Comprehensive exploration of technological tensioning effects in welded thin plate girders: an in-depth investigation","authors":"Hassanein I. Khalaf, D. Chodorowska, Raheem Al-Sabur, Andrzej Kubit, Wojciech Macek","doi":"10.1007/s40430-024-05144-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Thin-walled plate girders are widely used in structures and construction due to their effectiveness in transferring loads. The permanent deformations of the girder lead to a lack of stability, which necessarily leads to its replacement. Replacing permanently deformed thin-walled load-bearing structures requires large financial outlays. Technological prestressing is one of the most effective methods for studying and treating permanent deflections in girder elements. This study looks at the defection of welded thin-plate S235JR steel girders, examining how technological tensioning effects interact with different loading conditions. Four girders, A2 (welded in bottom caps), A3 (welded in two side caps), and A4 (welded in two side caps and bottom caps), as well as the prestressed B2 girder, which has two welded side caps, were subjected to a bend test. The girders were subjected to a load <i>P</i> (20, 40, 60, 80 and 95) kN. All points were examined during the 95 min of cooling time. For technological compression, the results showed that there is a convergence between the analytical solution and the experimental results, as the most significant deviation achieved in the analysis was 5.21 mm compared to 6 mm experimentally. When the girder is loaded with the force <i>P</i> = 50 N, the maximum deflection achieved at girder A4 is 4 mm, compared with 1mm at girder A2. In prestressed girder B, the deflections that were reached were 2.50 mm, 3.50 mm, and 3.52 mm in the analytical, experimental, and FE numerical models, respectively. The tensions that were reached were 36.96 MPa, 44.28 MPa, and 27.93 MPa.</p>","PeriodicalId":17252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05144-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thin-walled plate girders are widely used in structures and construction due to their effectiveness in transferring loads. The permanent deformations of the girder lead to a lack of stability, which necessarily leads to its replacement. Replacing permanently deformed thin-walled load-bearing structures requires large financial outlays. Technological prestressing is one of the most effective methods for studying and treating permanent deflections in girder elements. This study looks at the defection of welded thin-plate S235JR steel girders, examining how technological tensioning effects interact with different loading conditions. Four girders, A2 (welded in bottom caps), A3 (welded in two side caps), and A4 (welded in two side caps and bottom caps), as well as the prestressed B2 girder, which has two welded side caps, were subjected to a bend test. The girders were subjected to a load P (20, 40, 60, 80 and 95) kN. All points were examined during the 95 min of cooling time. For technological compression, the results showed that there is a convergence between the analytical solution and the experimental results, as the most significant deviation achieved in the analysis was 5.21 mm compared to 6 mm experimentally. When the girder is loaded with the force P = 50 N, the maximum deflection achieved at girder A4 is 4 mm, compared with 1mm at girder A2. In prestressed girder B, the deflections that were reached were 2.50 mm, 3.50 mm, and 3.52 mm in the analytical, experimental, and FE numerical models, respectively. The tensions that were reached were 36.96 MPa, 44.28 MPa, and 27.93 MPa.

Abstract Image

焊接薄板梁技术张拉效应的综合探索:深入研究
薄壁板梁因其有效传递荷载而被广泛应用于结构和建筑中。大梁的永久变形会导致其稳定性不足,这必然会导致大梁的更换。更换永久变形的薄壁承重结构需要大量的资金投入。技术预应力是研究和处理梁构件永久变形的最有效方法之一。本研究探讨了焊接薄板 S235JR 钢梁的变形,研究了技术张拉效应如何与不同的加载条件相互作用。对 A2(焊接在底盖上)、A3(焊接在两个侧盖上)和 A4(焊接在两个侧盖和底盖上)这四种大梁,以及有两个焊接侧盖的预应力 B2 大梁进行了弯曲试验。大梁承受的荷载分别为 P(20、40、60、80 和 95)千牛尼。在 95 分钟的冷却时间内对所有点进行了检测。在技术压缩方面,结果表明分析方案与实验结果趋于一致,因为分析得出的最大偏差为 5.21 毫米,而实验结果为 6 毫米。当大梁受力 P = 50 N 时,大梁 A4 的最大挠度为 4 mm,而大梁 A2 为 1 mm。在预应力梁 B 中,在分析、实验和 FE 数值模型中达到的挠度分别为 2.50 毫米、3.50 毫米和 3.52 毫米。达到的张力分别为 36.96 兆帕、44.28 兆帕和 27.93 兆帕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
536
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering publishes manuscripts on research, development and design related to science and technology in Mechanical Engineering. It is an interdisciplinary journal with interfaces to other branches of Engineering, as well as with Physics and Applied Mathematics. The Journal accepts manuscripts in four different formats: Full Length Articles, Review Articles, Book Reviews and Letters to the Editor. Interfaces with other branches of engineering, along with physics, applied mathematics and more Presents manuscripts on research, development and design related to science and technology in mechanical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信