Surprising Resilience of Science During a Global Pandemic: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis

Kian Ahrabian, Casandra Rusti, Ziao Wang, Jay Pujara, Kristina Lerman
{"title":"Surprising Resilience of Science During a Global Pandemic: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis","authors":"Kian Ahrabian, Casandra Rusti, Ziao Wang, Jay Pujara, Kristina Lerman","doi":"arxiv-2409.07710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted people globally, yet its effect on\nscientists and research institutions has yet to be fully examined. To address\nthis knowledge gap, we use a newly available bibliographic dataset covering\ntens of millions of papers and authors to investigate changes in research\nactivity and collaboration during this period. Employing statistical methods,\nwe analyze the pandemic's disruptions on the participation, productivity, and\ncollaborations of researchers at the top 1,000 institutions worldwide based on\nhistorical productivity, taking into account variables such as geography,\nresearcher seniority and gender, and field of study. Our findings reveal an\nunexpected trend: research activity and output significantly increased in the\nearly stages of the pandemic, indicating a surprising resilience in the\nscientific community. However, by the end of 2022, there was a notable\nreversion to historical trends in research participation and productivity. This\nreversion suggests that the initial spike in research activity was a\nshort-lived disruption rather than a permanent shift. As such, monitoring\nscientific outputs in 2023 and beyond becomes crucial. There may be a delayed\nnegative effect of the pandemic on research, given the long time horizon for\nmany research fields and the temporary closure of wet labs. Further analysis is\nneeded to fully comprehend the factors that underpin the resilience of\nscientific innovation in the face of global crises. Our study provides an\ninitial comprehensive exploration up to the end of 2022, offering valuable\ninsights into how the scientific community has adapted and responded over the\ncourse of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted people globally, yet its effect on scientists and research institutions has yet to be fully examined. To address this knowledge gap, we use a newly available bibliographic dataset covering tens of millions of papers and authors to investigate changes in research activity and collaboration during this period. Employing statistical methods, we analyze the pandemic's disruptions on the participation, productivity, and collaborations of researchers at the top 1,000 institutions worldwide based on historical productivity, taking into account variables such as geography, researcher seniority and gender, and field of study. Our findings reveal an unexpected trend: research activity and output significantly increased in the early stages of the pandemic, indicating a surprising resilience in the scientific community. However, by the end of 2022, there was a notable reversion to historical trends in research participation and productivity. This reversion suggests that the initial spike in research activity was a short-lived disruption rather than a permanent shift. As such, monitoring scientific outputs in 2023 and beyond becomes crucial. There may be a delayed negative effect of the pandemic on research, given the long time horizon for many research fields and the temporary closure of wet labs. Further analysis is needed to fully comprehend the factors that underpin the resilience of scientific innovation in the face of global crises. Our study provides an initial comprehensive exploration up to the end of 2022, offering valuable insights into how the scientific community has adapted and responded over the course of the pandemic.
全球大流行病期间科学令人惊讶的复原力:大规模描述性分析
COVID-19 大流行对全球人民产生了深远的影响,但它对科学家和研究机构的影响尚未得到充分研究。为了填补这一知识空白,我们利用新近获得的书目数据集(涵盖数千万篇论文和作者)来研究这一时期研究活动与合作的变化。我们采用统计方法,以历史生产力为基础,并考虑到地理位置、研究人员的资历和性别以及研究领域等变量,分析了大流行对全球排名前 1000 位机构的研究人员的参与、生产力和合作所造成的干扰。我们的研究结果揭示了一个意料之外的趋势:在大流行病的早期阶段,研究活动和产出显著增加,表明科学界具有惊人的复原力。然而,到 2022 年底,研究参与度和生产率的历史趋势出现了明显的逆转。这种逆转表明,最初的研究活动高峰只是短暂的中断,而不是永久性的转变。因此,监测 2023 年及以后的科研产出至关重要。鉴于许多研究领域的时间跨度较长以及湿实验室的暂时关闭,大流行病可能会对研究产生延迟的负面影响。要全面了解科学创新在全球危机面前的复原力,还需要进一步的分析。我们的研究提供了截至 2022 年底的初步全面探索,为科学界在大流行病期间如何适应和应对提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信