Kian Ahrabian, Casandra Rusti, Ziao Wang, Jay Pujara, Kristina Lerman
{"title":"Surprising Resilience of Science During a Global Pandemic: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis","authors":"Kian Ahrabian, Casandra Rusti, Ziao Wang, Jay Pujara, Kristina Lerman","doi":"arxiv-2409.07710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted people globally, yet its effect on\nscientists and research institutions has yet to be fully examined. To address\nthis knowledge gap, we use a newly available bibliographic dataset covering\ntens of millions of papers and authors to investigate changes in research\nactivity and collaboration during this period. Employing statistical methods,\nwe analyze the pandemic's disruptions on the participation, productivity, and\ncollaborations of researchers at the top 1,000 institutions worldwide based on\nhistorical productivity, taking into account variables such as geography,\nresearcher seniority and gender, and field of study. Our findings reveal an\nunexpected trend: research activity and output significantly increased in the\nearly stages of the pandemic, indicating a surprising resilience in the\nscientific community. However, by the end of 2022, there was a notable\nreversion to historical trends in research participation and productivity. This\nreversion suggests that the initial spike in research activity was a\nshort-lived disruption rather than a permanent shift. As such, monitoring\nscientific outputs in 2023 and beyond becomes crucial. There may be a delayed\nnegative effect of the pandemic on research, given the long time horizon for\nmany research fields and the temporary closure of wet labs. Further analysis is\nneeded to fully comprehend the factors that underpin the resilience of\nscientific innovation in the face of global crises. Our study provides an\ninitial comprehensive exploration up to the end of 2022, offering valuable\ninsights into how the scientific community has adapted and responded over the\ncourse of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted people globally, yet its effect on
scientists and research institutions has yet to be fully examined. To address
this knowledge gap, we use a newly available bibliographic dataset covering
tens of millions of papers and authors to investigate changes in research
activity and collaboration during this period. Employing statistical methods,
we analyze the pandemic's disruptions on the participation, productivity, and
collaborations of researchers at the top 1,000 institutions worldwide based on
historical productivity, taking into account variables such as geography,
researcher seniority and gender, and field of study. Our findings reveal an
unexpected trend: research activity and output significantly increased in the
early stages of the pandemic, indicating a surprising resilience in the
scientific community. However, by the end of 2022, there was a notable
reversion to historical trends in research participation and productivity. This
reversion suggests that the initial spike in research activity was a
short-lived disruption rather than a permanent shift. As such, monitoring
scientific outputs in 2023 and beyond becomes crucial. There may be a delayed
negative effect of the pandemic on research, given the long time horizon for
many research fields and the temporary closure of wet labs. Further analysis is
needed to fully comprehend the factors that underpin the resilience of
scientific innovation in the face of global crises. Our study provides an
initial comprehensive exploration up to the end of 2022, offering valuable
insights into how the scientific community has adapted and responded over the
course of the pandemic.